Kim Min-Joo, Lee Seu-Ran, Lee Min-Young, Sohn Jason W, Yun Hyong Geon, Choi Joon Yong, Jeon Sang Won, Suh Tae Suk
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Research Institute of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
PLoS One. 2017 May 4;12(5):e0176227. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176227. eCollection 2017.
Development and comparison of spine-shaped phantoms generated by two different 3D-printing technologies, digital light processing (DLP) and Polyjet has been purposed to utilize in patient-specific quality assurance (QA) of stereotactic body radiation treatment. The developed 3D-printed spine QA phantom consisted of an acrylic body phantom and a 3D-printed spine shaped object. DLP and Polyjet 3D printers using a high-density acrylic polymer were employed to produce spine-shaped phantoms based on CT images. Image fusion was performed to evaluate the reproducibility of our phantom, and the Hounsfield units (HUs) were measured based on each CT image. Two different intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans based on both CT phantom image sets from the two printed spine-shaped phantoms with acrylic body phantoms were designed to deliver 16 Gy dose to the planning target volume (PTV) and were compared for target coverage and normal organ-sparing. Image fusion demonstrated good reproducibility of the developed phantom. The HU values of the DLP- and Polyjet-printed spine vertebrae differed by 54.3 on average. The PTV Dmax dose for the DLP-generated phantom was about 1.488 Gy higher than that for the Polyjet-generated phantom. The organs at risk received a lower dose for the 3D printed spine-shaped phantom image using the DLP technique than for the phantom image using the Polyjet technique. Despite using the same material for printing the spine-shaped phantom, these phantoms generated by different 3D printing techniques, DLP and Polyjet, showed different HU values and these differently appearing HU values according to the printing technique could be an extra consideration for developing the 3D printed spine-shaped phantom depending on the patient's age and the density of the spinal bone. Therefore, the 3D printing technique and materials should be carefully chosen by taking into account the condition of the patient in order to accurately produce 3D printed patient-specific QA phantom.
两种不同的3D打印技术——数字光处理(DLP)和Polyjet——所生成的脊柱形模体的开发与比较,旨在用于立体定向体部放射治疗的患者特异性质量保证(QA)。所开发的3D打印脊柱QA模体由一个丙烯酸体模和一个3D打印的脊柱形状物体组成。使用高密度丙烯酸聚合物的DLP和Polyjet 3D打印机基于CT图像制作脊柱形模体。进行图像融合以评估我们模体的可重复性,并基于每个CT图像测量亨氏单位(HU)。基于来自两个带有丙烯酸体模的打印脊柱形模体的CT模体图像集,设计了两种不同的调强放射治疗计划,以向计划靶区(PTV)输送16 Gy剂量,并比较了靶区覆盖情况和正常器官保护情况。图像融合显示所开发模体具有良好的可重复性。DLP打印和Polyjet打印的脊柱椎体的HU值平均相差54.3。DLP生成的模体的PTV Dmax剂量比Polyjet生成的模体高约1.488 Gy。对于使用DLP技术的3D打印脊柱形模体图像,危及器官所接受的剂量低于使用Polyjet技术的模体图像。尽管用于打印脊柱形模体的材料相同,但由不同的3D打印技术DLP和Polyjet生成的这些模体显示出不同的HU值,并且根据打印技术而出现的这些不同的HU值,在根据患者年龄和脊椎骨密度开发3D打印脊柱形模体时可能是一个额外需要考虑的因素。因此,应根据患者情况仔细选择3D打印技术和材料,以便准确制作3D打印的患者特异性QA模体。