• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Repeated, Close Physician Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Teams Associated with Greater Teamwork.重复的、紧密的医生冠状动脉旁路移植手术团队与更好的团队合作相关。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr;53(2):1025-1041. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12703. Epub 2017 May 4.
2
Association Between Physician Teamwork and Health System Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.冠状动脉旁路移植术后医生团队合作与卫生系统结局之间的关联
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 Nov;9(6):641-648. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.002714. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
3
Team Configurations, Efficiency, and Family Physician Burnout.团队配置、效率和家庭医生倦怠。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2020 May-Jun;33(3):368-377. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.03.190336.
4
Differences between physician social networks for cardiac surgery serving communities with high versus low proportions of black residents.为黑人居民比例高和低的社区提供心脏手术服务的医生社交网络之间的差异。
Med Care. 2015 Feb;53(2):160-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000291.
5
Dr. Congeniality: Understanding the Importance of Surgeons' Nontechnical Skills Through 360° Feedback.《魅力医生:通过 360°反馈了解外科医生的非技术技能的重要性》
J Surg Educ. 2018 Jul-Aug;75(4):984-992. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.12.006. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
6
Opening of specialty cardiac hospitals and use of coronary revascularization in medicare beneficiaries.专业心脏病医院的开业情况以及医疗保险受益人群中冠状动脉血运重建术的使用情况。
JAMA. 2007 Mar 7;297(9):962-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.9.962.
7
Provider Care Team Segregation and Operative Mortality Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.术者团队分工与冠状动脉旁路移植术后的手术死亡率。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 May;14(5):e007778. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.007778. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
8
Patient-Sharing Networks of Physicians and Health Care Utilization and Spending Among Medicare Beneficiaries.医生患者共享网络与医疗保险受益人的医疗利用和支出
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jan 1;178(1):66-73. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.5034.
9
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
10
The influence of teamwork culture on physician and nurse resignation rates in hospitals.团队合作文化对医院内科医生和护士离职率的影响。
Health Serv Manage Res. 2008 Feb;21(1):23-31. doi: 10.1258/hsmr.2007.007011.

引用本文的文献

1
Unpacking the black box of interprofessional collaboration within healthcare networks: a scoping review.剖析医疗网络中跨专业协作的黑箱:一项范围综述
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 13;15(6):e101702. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101702.
2
A Scoping Review of Multilevel Patient-Sharing Network Measures in Health Services Research.卫生服务研究中多层次患者共享网络措施的范围综述
Med Care Res Rev. 2025 Jun;82(3):203-224. doi: 10.1177/10775587241304140. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
3
Rural-Urban Differences in Patient-Sharing by Clinicians Caring for Children with Medical Complexity: Network Analysis of the Pediatric Workforce in Three States.照顾患有复杂疾病儿童的临床医生在患者分配上的城乡差异:对三个州儿科劳动力的网络分析
J Pediatr. 2025 May;280:114506. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2025.114506. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
4
Bundled payments lead to quality improvements in hospitals' skilled nursing facility referral networks.捆绑支付促使医院熟练护理设施转介网络的质量得到改善。
Am J Manag Care. 2024 Jun 1;30(6):e184-e190. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2024.89566.
5
Care fragmentation predicts 90-day durable ventricular assist device outcomes.护理碎片化可预测 90 天耐用性心室辅助装置结局。
Am J Manag Care. 2022 Dec 1;28(12):e444-e451. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2022.89280.
6
Association Between Care Fragmentation and Total Spending After Durable Left Ventricular Device Implant: A Mediation Analysis of Health Care-Associated Infections Within a National Medicare-Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs Linked Dataset.耐用性左心室装置植入后护理碎片化与总支出的关联:基于国家医疗保险-胸外科医师学会 Intermacs 链接数据集的医疗保健相关感染中介分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2022 Sep;15(9):e008592. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.008592. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
7
Provider Care Team Segregation and Operative Mortality Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.术者团队分工与冠状动脉旁路移植术后的手术死亡率。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 May;14(5):e007778. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.007778. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
8
Variation in Provider Connectedness Associates With Outcomes of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases in an Analysis of Data From a National Health System.在对国家卫生系统数据的分析中,提供者关联度的变化与炎症性肠病的结果相关。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Nov;19(11):2302-2311.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.08.028. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
9
Clarifying workforce flexibility from a division of labor perspective: a mixed methods study of an emergency department team.从劳动分工的角度阐明劳动力的灵活性:对急诊科团队的一项混合方法研究。
Hum Resour Health. 2020 Mar 6;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12960-020-0460-7.
10
Understanding and Addressing Variation in Health Care-Associated Infections After Durable Ventricular Assist Device Therapy: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.理解并应对持续性心室辅助装置治疗后医疗相关感染的差异:一项混合方法研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Jan 7;9(1):e14701. doi: 10.2196/14701.

本文引用的文献

1
Physician Networks and Ambulatory Care-sensitive Admissions.医师网络与门诊护理敏感型住院病例
Med Care. 2015 Jun;53(6):534-41. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000365.
2
Differences between physician social networks for cardiac surgery serving communities with high versus low proportions of black residents.为黑人居民比例高和低的社区提供心脏手术服务的医生社交网络之间的差异。
Med Care. 2015 Feb;53(2):160-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000291.
3
The Pioneer accountable care organization model: improving quality and lowering costs.先锋责任医疗组织模式:提高质量并降低成本。
JAMA. 2014;312(16):1635-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.13109.
4
Physician social networks and variation in rates of complications after radical prostatectomy.医生社交网络与根治性前列腺切除术后并发症发生率的变化。
Value Health. 2014 Jul;17(5):611-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.04.011. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
5
The patient centered medical home. A systematic review.患者为中心的医疗之家。系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 5;158(3):169-78. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00579.
6
Measuring teamwork in health care settings: a review of survey instruments.医疗环境中团队合作的测量:调查工具综述
Med Care. 2015 Apr;53(4):e16-30. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31827feef6.
7
Patient safety in the cardiac operating room: human factors and teamwork: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.心脏手术室中的患者安全:人为因素与团队协作:美国心脏协会的科学声明
Circulation. 2013 Sep 3;128(10):1139-69. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182a38efa. Epub 2013 Aug 5.
8
The heart team of cardiovascular care.心血管护理的心脏团队。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Mar 5;61(9):903-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.1034.
9
The teaming curve: a longitudinal study of the influence of surgical team familiarity on operative time.团队协作曲线:一项关于手术团队熟悉程度对手术时间影响的纵向研究。
Ann Surg. 2013 Dec;258(6):953-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182864ffe.
10
ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 2012 appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization focused update: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography.ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 2012 冠状动脉血运重建的适当应用标准重点更新:美国心脏病学会基金会适当应用标准工作组、心血管血管造影和介入学会、胸外科医师学会、美国胸外科医师协会、美国心脏协会、美国核医学会和心血管计算机断层扫描学会的报告。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Apr;143(4):780-803. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.01.061.

重复的、紧密的医生冠状动脉旁路移植手术团队与更好的团队合作相关。

Repeated, Close Physician Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Teams Associated with Greater Teamwork.

机构信息

Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI.

Department of Strategic Management and Entrepreneurship, University of Minnesota Carlson School of Management, Minneapolis, MN.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr;53(2):1025-1041. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12703. Epub 2017 May 4.

DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.12703
PMID:28474343
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5867088/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether observed patterns of physician interaction around shared patients are associated with higher levels of teamwork as perceived by physicians.

DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Michigan Medicare beneficiaries who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedures at 24 hospitals in the state between 2008 and 2011.

STUDY DESIGN

We assessed hospital teamwork using the teamwork climate scale in the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire. After aggregating across CABG discharges at these hospitals, we mapped the physician referral networks (including both surgeons and nonsurgeons) that served them and measured three network properties: (1) reinforcement, (2) clustering, and (3) density. We then used multilevel regression models to identify associations between network properties and teamwork at the hospitals on which the networks were anchored.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

In hospitals where physicians repeatedly cared for patients with the same colleagues, physicians perceived better teamwork (β-reinforcement = 3.28, p = .003). When physicians who worked together also had other colleagues in common, the reported teamwork was stronger (β clustering = 1.71, p = .001). Reported teamwork did not change when physicians worked with a higher proportion of other physicians at the hospital (β density = -0.58, p = .64).

CONCLUSION

In networks with higher levels of reinforcement and clustering, physicians perceive stronger teamwork, perhaps because the strong ties between them create a shared understanding; however, sharing patients with more physicians overall (i.e., density) did not lead to stronger teamwork. Clinical and organizational leaders may consider designing the structure of clinical teams to increase interactions with known colleagues and repeated interactions between providers.

摘要

目的

确定医生围绕共同患者进行交流的模式是否与医生感知到的更高水平的团队合作有关。

数据来源/研究地点:2008 年至 2011 年间,密歇根州 24 家医院接受冠状动脉旁路移植术 (CABG) 的医疗保险受益患者。

研究设计

我们使用安全态度问卷中的团队合作氛围量表评估医院的团队合作情况。在对这些医院的 CABG 出院患者进行汇总后,我们绘制了为他们服务的医生转诊网络(包括外科医生和非外科医生),并测量了三个网络属性:(1)强化,(2)聚类,和(3)密度。然后,我们使用多层次回归模型来确定网络属性与网络所锚定的医院的团队合作之间的关联。

主要发现

在医生反复照顾同一批同事的患者的医院中,医生认为团队合作更好(β-强化=3.28,p=0.003)。当一起工作的医生也有其他共同的同事时,报告的团队合作更强(β-聚类=1.71,p=0.001)。当医生与医院内更多其他医生合作时,报告的团队合作没有变化(β-密度=-0.58,p=0.64)。

结论

在强化和聚类程度较高的网络中,医生认为团队合作更强,也许是因为他们之间的强联系创造了共同的理解;然而,与更多医生分享患者(即密度)并没有导致更强的团队合作。临床和组织领导者可能会考虑设计临床团队的结构,以增加与已知同事的互动以及提供者之间的重复互动。