Diabetes Research Group, Institute of Life Sciences College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Laboratory of Human Nutrition and Atherosclerosis, Institute of Clinical Research, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Dec;19(12):1645-1654. doi: 10.1111/dom.12998. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) comorbidities, with CV disease being the most common cause of death in adults with T2DM. Although glucocentric therapies may improve glycaemic control (as determined by glycated haemoglobin levels), evidence suggests that this approach alone has limited beneficial effects on CV outcomes relative to improvements in lipid and blood pressure control. This may be explained in part by the fact that current antidiabetic treatment regimens primarily address overall glycaemia and/or fasting plasma glucose, but not the postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) excursions that have a fundamental causative role in increasing CV risk. This literature review evaluates the relationship between PPG and the risk of CV disease, discusses the treatment of T2DM with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and examines the associated CV outcomes. The literature analysis suggests that exaggerated PPG excursions are a risk factor for CV disease because of their adverse pathophysiologic effects on the vasculature, resulting in increased all-cause and CV-related mortality. Although GLP-1 RAs are well established in the current T2DM treatment paradigm, a subgroup of these compounds has a particularly pronounced, persistent and short-lived effect on gastric emptying and, hence, lower PPG substantially. However, current long-term data on CV outcomes with GLP-1 RAs are contradictory, with both beneficial and adverse effects having been reported. This review explores the opportunity to direct treatment towards controlling PPG excursions, thereby improving not only overall glycaemic control but also CV outcomes.
2 型糖尿病(T2DM)是心血管(CV)合并症的独立危险因素,CV 疾病是 T2DM 成人患者最常见的死亡原因。尽管以葡萄糖为中心的治疗可能改善血糖控制(通过糖化血红蛋白水平确定),但有证据表明,与改善血脂和血压控制相比,这种方法对 CV 结局的有益影响有限。这可能部分解释为,目前的抗糖尿病治疗方案主要针对总体血糖和/或空腹血糖,但不针对餐后血糖(PPG)波动,而 PPG 波动对增加 CV 风险具有根本的因果作用。本文复习评估了 PPG 与 CV 疾病风险之间的关系,讨论了用胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)治疗 T2DM,并考察了相关的 CV 结局。文献分析表明,PPG 波动加剧是 CV 疾病的一个危险因素,因为其对血管的不良病理生理作用导致全因和 CV 相关死亡率增加。虽然 GLP-1 RAs 在当前的 T2DM 治疗模式中已经确立,但这些化合物的亚组对胃排空具有特别明显、持久和短暂的影响,因此可显著降低 PPG。然而,目前关于 GLP-1 RAs 的 CV 结局的长期数据相互矛盾,既报告了有益作用,也报告了不利作用。本文复习探讨了将治疗方向转向控制 PPG 波动的机会,从而不仅改善总体血糖控制,而且改善 CV 结局。