Suppr超能文献

用于支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)的一次性使用和常规支气管镜的比较研究(NCT 02515591)。

Single use and conventional bronchoscopes for Broncho alveolar lavage (BAL) in research: a comparative study (NCT 02515591).

机构信息

Respiratory Infection Group, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.

Respiratory Research Group, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital NHS Trust, Liverpool, L7 8XP, UK.

出版信息

BMC Pulm Med. 2017 May 5;17(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12890-017-0421-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Broncho alveolar lavage (BAL) is widely used for investigative research to study innate, cellular and humoral immune responses, and in early phase drug trials. Conventional (multiple use) flexible bronchoscopes have time and monetary costs associated with cleaning, and carries a small risk of cross infection. Single use bronchoscopes may provide an alternative, but have not been evaluated in this context.

METHODS

Healthy volunteers underwent bronchoscopy at a day-case clinical research unit using the Ambu® aScope single-use flexible intubation bronchoscope. Broncho alveolar lavage was performed from a sub segmental bronchus within the right middle lobe; a total of 200 ml of warmed normal saline was instilled then aspirated using handheld suction. BAL volume yield, cell yield and viability were recorded.

RESULTS

Ten volunteers, (mean age 23 years, six male) participated. Bronchoscopies were carried out by one of two senior bronchoscopists, experienced in the technique of obtaining BAL for research purposes. The results were compared to 50 (mean age 23, 14 male) procedures performed using the conventional scope by the same two bronchoscopists. The total volume yield was significantly higher in the disposable group median 152 ml (IQR 141-166 ml) as compared to conventional 124 ml (110-135 ml), p = <0.01. The total cell yield and viability were similar in both groups, with no significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

With single use bronchoscopes, we achieved a larger BAL volume yield than conventional bronchoscopes, with comparable cell yield and viability. Better volume yields can potentially reduce post procedure side effects such as pleuritic chest pain and cough. The risk of cross infection can be eliminated, providing reassurance to researchers and participants. Reduced maintenance requirements can be cost effective. These could potentially be used for early phase drug development studies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was registered prospectively in July 2015 with the National Clinical Trials register, with the following registration number assigned: NCT 02515591 .

摘要

背景

支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)广泛用于研究先天、细胞和体液免疫反应的研究,以及早期药物试验。传统的(多次使用)柔性支气管镜在清洗方面需要时间和金钱成本,并且存在交叉感染的小风险。一次性使用的支气管镜可能是一种替代方法,但尚未在这种情况下进行评估。

方法

健康志愿者在日间临床研究单位使用 Ambu® aScope 一次性使用柔性插管支气管镜进行支气管镜检查。支气管肺泡灌洗从右中叶的亚段支气管进行;共注入 200 毫升温热生理盐水,然后使用手动抽吸将其吸出。记录 BAL 体积产量、细胞产量和活力。

结果

10 名志愿者(平均年龄 23 岁,6 名男性)参加了研究。支气管镜检查由两名经验丰富的高级支气管镜医师之一进行,他们在研究目的方面都具有获取 BAL 的经验。结果与两名相同的支气管镜医师进行的 50 次(平均年龄 23 岁,14 名男性)常规支气管镜检查进行了比较。在一次性组中,总容量产量明显更高,中位数为 152ml(IQR 141-166ml),而常规组为 124ml(110-135ml),p = <0.01。两组的总细胞产量和活力相似,无显着差异。

结论

使用一次性支气管镜,我们获得的 BAL 体积产量大于传统支气管镜,细胞产量和活力相当。更大的体积产量可能会减少术后副作用,如胸痛和咳嗽。可以消除交叉感染的风险,为研究人员和参与者提供保证。减少维护要求可以降低成本效益。这些可能被用于早期药物开发研究。

试验注册

该试验于 2015 年 7 月在国家临床试验注册中心进行了前瞻性注册,分配了以下注册号码:NCT 02515591。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9f0/5420119/df4ca2b8e3aa/12890_2017_421_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验