Jones Neil P, Fournier Jay C, Stone Lindsey B
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, 3811 O'Hara St., Pittsburgh, PA 15216, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, 3811 O'Hara St., Pittsburgh, PA 15216, USA.
J Affect Disord. 2017 Aug 15;218:210-216. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.04.069. Epub 2017 Apr 29.
Analytical rumination can be characterized as negative thoughts focused on searching for answers to personal problems. Failure to think concretely during autobiographical problem-solving (APS) is hypothesized to drive the inability of ruminators to generate effective solutions. Clarifying the brain correlates underlying APS deficits in depressed ruminators may identify novel biological targets for treatment.
Forty participants (22 unmedicated depressed and 18 never-depressed adults) ranging in rumination engaged in APS and negative self-referential processing (NSP) of negative trait adjectives during fMRI. We contrasted activation during APS with activation during NSP to isolate regions contributing to APS.
Rumination was associated with having generated fewer solutions during APS and with a failure to recruit the angular gyrus (AG) and the medial frontal gyrus (MFG) during APS. Rumination was associated with greater MFG activation during NSP and stronger connectivity between the AG and the rostrolateral prefrontal cortex (RLPFC) during APS relative to NSP. Findings were not driven by clinical status.
The use of an extreme groups approach can result in overestimation of effects sizes.
Ruminators fail to recruit regions with the default network (DN) that support APS. In particular, a failure to recruit the AG during APS may drive the abstract thinking style previously shown to explain depressed ruminator's difficulty generating concrete solutions. Targeting this mechanism directly may reduce rumination.
分析性沉思可被描述为专注于寻找个人问题答案的消极思维。在自传体问题解决(APS)过程中未能进行具体思考被认为是导致沉思者无法产生有效解决方案的原因。阐明抑郁沉思者中APS缺陷背后的大脑关联因素可能会确定新的治疗生物学靶点。
40名参与者(22名未服药的抑郁症患者和18名从未患过抑郁症的成年人)在功能磁共振成像(fMRI)期间进行APS以及对消极特质形容词的消极自我参照加工(NSP)。我们将APS期间的激活与NSP期间的激活进行对比,以分离出对APS有贡献的区域。
沉思与在APS期间产生的解决方案较少以及在APS期间未能激活角回(AG)和内侧前额叶皮质(MFG)有关。沉思与NSP期间MFG的更大激活以及相对于NSP,APS期间AG与前额叶 rostrolateral 皮质(RLPFC)之间更强的连接性有关。研究结果不受临床状态的影响。
使用极端组方法可能会导致对效应大小的高估。
沉思者未能激活支持APS的默认网络(DN)区域。特别是,在APS期间未能激活AG可能会导致先前显示的抽象思维方式,这可以解释抑郁沉思者在产生具体解决方案方面的困难。直接针对这一机制可能会减少沉思。