Suppr超能文献

反刍性自我聚焦的不同模式:抽象反刍与具体反刍对抑郁症患者问题解决的影响

Distinct modes of ruminative self-focus: impact of abstract versus concrete rumination on problem solving in depression.

作者信息

Watkins Ed, Moulds Michelle

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Emotion. 2005 Sep;5(3):319-28. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.5.3.319.

Abstract

One account for the negative effects of rumination on social problem solving (SPS) is the symptom-focus hypothesis, which proposes that focus on symptoms amplifies the vicious cycle between depressed mood and negative cognition. The authors tested a contrasting account, the reduced concreteness hypothesis, which postulates that the abstract thinking typical of rumination impairs SPS. In 40 depressed patients and 40 never-depressed controls, SPS was assessed before and after versions of symptom-focused rumination known to differentially induce abstract versus concrete self-focus (E. Watkins & J. D. Teasdale, 2001). As predicted by reduced concreteness theory, relative to abstract self-focus, concrete self-focus improved SPS in depressed patients, suggesting that the particular mode of symptom-focus, rather than symptom-focus per se, determines the effects of rumination on problem solving.

摘要

对反刍思维对社会问题解决(SPS)产生负面影响的一种解释是症状聚焦假说,该假说提出,对症状的关注会加剧抑郁情绪与消极认知之间的恶性循环。作者检验了一种与之相反的解释,即具体性降低假说,该假说假定反刍思维所特有的抽象思维会损害社会问题解决能力。在40名抑郁症患者和40名从未患过抑郁症的对照者中,在已知能以不同方式诱发抽象与具体自我聚焦的症状聚焦式反刍思维版本前后,对社会问题解决能力进行了评估(E. 沃特金斯和J. D. 蒂斯代尔,2001)。正如具体性降低理论所预测的那样,相对于抽象自我聚焦,具体自我聚焦改善了抑郁症患者的社会问题解决能力,这表明症状聚焦的特定模式,而非症状聚焦本身,决定了反刍思维对问题解决的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验