• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Superion椎间融合器治疗中度腰椎管狭窄症:4年随访结果

Superion Interspinous Spacer Treatment of Moderate Spinal Stenosis: 4-Year Results.

作者信息

Nunley Pierce D, Patel Vikas V, Orndorff Douglas G, Lavelle William F, Block Jon E, Geisler Fred H

机构信息

Spine Institute of Louisiana, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA.

The Spine Center, University of Colorado Hospital, Denver, Colorado, USA.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2017 Aug;104:279-283. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.04.163. Epub 2017 May 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.04.163
PMID:28479526
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine 4-year clinical outcomes in patients with moderate lumbar spinal stenosis treated with minimally invasive stand-alone interspinous process decompression using the Superion device.

METHODS

The 4-year Superion data were extracted from a randomized, controlled Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption trial. Patients with intermittent neurogenic claudication relieved with back flexion who failed at least 6 months of nonsurgical management were enrolled. Outcomes included Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) symptom severity (ss), physical function (pf) and patient satisfaction (ps) subdomains, leg and back pain visual analog scale (VAS), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). At 4-year follow-up, 89 of the 122 patients (73%) provided complete clinical outcome evaluations.

RESULTS

At 4 years after index procedure, 75 of 89 patients with Superion (84.3%) demonstrated clinical success on at least 2 of 3 ZCQ domains. Individual component responder rates were 83% (74/89), 79% (70/89), and 87% (77/89) for ZCQss, ZCQpf, and ZCQps; 78% (67/86) and 66% (57/86) for leg and back pain VAS; and 62% (55/89) for ODI. Patients with Superion also demonstrated percentage improvements over baseline of 41%, 40%, 73%, 69%, and 61% for ZCQss, ZCQpf, leg pain VAS, back pain VAS, and ODI. Within-group effect sizes all were classified as very large (>1.0): 1.49, 1.65, 1.42, 1.12, and 1.46 for ZCQss, ZCQpf, leg pain VAS, back pain VAS, and ODI.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive implantation of the Superion device provides long-term, durable relief of symptoms of intermittent neurogenic claudication for patients with moderate lumbar spinal stenosis.

摘要

目的

使用Superion装置对中度腰椎管狭窄症患者进行微创独立棘突间减压,以确定其4年的临床疗效。

方法

4年的Superion数据来自一项随机对照的美国食品药品监督管理局研究器械豁免试验。纳入经至少6个月非手术治疗失败、后伸位可缓解间歇性神经源性跛行的患者。疗效指标包括苏黎世跛行问卷(ZCQ)症状严重程度(ss)、身体功能(pf)和患者满意度(ps)子域、腿部和背部疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)以及Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)。在4年随访时,122例患者中的89例(73%)提供了完整的临床疗效评估。

结果

在初次手术后4年,89例接受Superion治疗的患者中有75例(84.3%)在ZCQ的3个域中的至少2个域显示临床成功。ZCQss、ZCQpf和ZCQps的个体成分缓解率分别为83%(74/89)、79%(70/89)和87%(77/89);腿部和背部疼痛VAS分别为78%(67/86)和66%(57/86);ODI为62%(55/89)。接受Superion治疗的患者在ZCQss、ZCQpf、腿部疼痛VAS、背部疼痛VAS和ODI方面相对于基线的改善百分比分别为41%、40%、73%、69%和61%。组内效应量均被分类为非常大(>1.0):ZCQss、ZCQpf、腿部疼痛VAS、背部疼痛VAS和ODI分别为1.49、1.65、1.42、1.12和1.46。

结论

微创植入Superion装置可为中度腰椎管狭窄症患者提供长期、持久的间歇性神经源性跛行症状缓解。

相似文献

1
Superion Interspinous Spacer Treatment of Moderate Spinal Stenosis: 4-Year Results.Superion椎间融合器治疗中度腰椎管狭窄症:4年随访结果
World Neurosurg. 2017 Aug;104:279-283. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.04.163. Epub 2017 May 4.
2
Five-year durability of stand-alone interspinous process decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症单纯棘突间减压的五年疗效持久性
Clin Interv Aging. 2017 Sep 6;12:1409-1417. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S143503. eCollection 2017.
3
Superion interspinous process spacer for intermittent neurogenic claudication secondary to moderate lumbar spinal stenosis: two-year results from a randomized controlled FDA-IDE pivotal trial.用于中度腰椎管狭窄继发间歇性神经源性跛行的Superion棘突间撑开器:一项FDA-IDE随机对照关键试验的两年结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Mar 1;40(5):275-82. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000735.
4
Stand-alone interspinous spacer versus decompressive laminectomy for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.单纯棘突间撑开器与减压性椎板切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的比较
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2015;12(6):763-9. doi: 10.1586/17434440.2015.1100071. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
5
MILD® Is an Effective Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication: MiDAS ENCORE Randomized Controlled Trial.MILD®是治疗神经源性间歇性跛行型腰椎管狭窄症的有效方法:MiDAS ENCORE随机对照试验。
Pain Physician. 2016 May;19(4):229-42.
6
Prospective, randomized, multicenter study with 2-year follow-up to compare the performance of decompression with and without interlaminar stabilization.一项前瞻性、随机、多中心研究,随访2年,比较有无椎板间稳定化减压的效果。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Apr;28(4):406-415. doi: 10.3171/2017.11.SPINE17643. Epub 2018 Jan 26.
7
Two-year results of interspinous spacer (X-Stop) implantation in 175 patients with neurologic intermittent claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis.175例因腰椎管狭窄导致神经源性间歇性跛行患者行棘突间撑开器(X-Stop)植入术的两年结果。
Eur Spine J. 2009 Jun;18(6):823-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0967-z. Epub 2009 Apr 22.
8
Minimally invasive treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a novel interspinous spacer.新型棘突间撑开器微创治疗腰椎管狭窄症
Clin Interv Aging. 2011;6:227-33. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S23656. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
9
Aperius interspinous implant versus open surgical decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis.经皮棘突间撑开器植入术与开放式减压手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的比较。
Spine J. 2011 Oct;11(10):933-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.08.419.
10
Superion(®) InterSpinous Spacer for treatment of moderate degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: durable three-year results of a randomized controlled trial.用于治疗中度退行性腰椎管狭窄症的Superion(®)椎间融合器:一项随机对照试验的三年长期结果
J Pain Res. 2015 Oct 3;8:657-62. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S92633. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
24-Month Outcomes of Indirect Decompression Using a Minimally Invasive Interspinous Fixation Device versus Standard Open Direct Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Prospective Comparison.使用微创棘突间固定装置进行间接减压与标准开放直接减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症的24个月疗效:一项前瞻性比较
J Pain Res. 2024 Jun 13;17:2079-2097. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S453343. eCollection 2024.
2
Longitudinal Analysis of the Care Pathway of Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in the US.美国腰椎管狭窄症患者护理路径的纵向分析
J Pain Res. 2024 Jun 4;17:1979-1987. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S454887. eCollection 2024.
3
Bibliometric analysis of interspinous device in treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases.
棘突间装置治疗腰椎退行性疾病的文献计量分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Mar 1;103(9):e37351. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037351.
4
Instrumented Posterior Arthrodesis of the Lumbar Spine: Prospective Study Evaluating Fusion Outcomes in Patients Receiving an Interspinous Fixation Device for the Treatment of Degenerative Spine Diseases.腰椎后路器械融合术:一项前瞻性研究,评估接受棘突间固定装置治疗退行性脊柱疾病患者的融合效果。
J Pain Res. 2023 Aug 24;16:2909-2918. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S417319. eCollection 2023.
5
Longitudinal Comparative Analysis of Complications and Subsequent Interventions Following Stand-Alone Interspinous Spacers, Open Decompression, or Fusion for Lumbar Stenosis.孤立棘突间撑开器、开放式减压或融合术治疗腰椎狭窄症的并发症及后续干预的纵向对比分析。
Adv Ther. 2023 Aug;40(8):3512-3524. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02562-6. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
6
Comparison analysis of safety outcomes and the rate of subsequent spinal procedures between interspinous spacer without decompression versus minimally invasive lumbar decompression.比较分析不减压棘突间撑开器与微创腰椎减压术后的安全性结果和后续脊柱手术率。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Jan 11;49(1):30-35. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2022-104236.
7
Neurosurgical Management of Interspinous Device Complications: A Case Series.棘突间装置并发症的神经外科处理:病例系列
Front Surg. 2022 Mar 16;9:841134. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.841134. eCollection 2022.
8
A Differential Clinical Benefit Examination of Full Lumbar Endoscopy vs Interspinous Process Spacers in the Treatment of Spinal Stenosis: An Effect Size Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.全腰椎内镜与棘突间撑开器治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效差异比较:临床结局的效应量Meta分析
Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Feb;16(1):102-123. doi: 10.14444/8200. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
9
Decompression Using Minimally Invasive Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Associated with Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Review.微创减压手术治疗退变性腰椎滑脱症合并腰椎管狭窄症的综述
Pain Ther. 2021 Dec;10(2):941-959. doi: 10.1007/s40122-021-00293-6. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
10
Comparison of Adverse Outcomes Following Placement of Superion Interspinous Spacer Device Versus Laminectomy and Laminotomy.Superion椎间棘突间撑开器植入术与椎板切除术及椎板切开术不良结局的比较。
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Feb;15(1):153-160. doi: 10.14444/8020. Epub 2021 Feb 12.