Suppr超能文献

腰椎管狭窄症单纯棘突间减压的五年疗效持久性

Five-year durability of stand-alone interspinous process decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.

作者信息

Nunley Pierce D, Patel Vikas V, Orndorff Douglas G, Lavelle William F, Block Jon E, Geisler Fred H

机构信息

Spine Institute of Louisiana, Shreveport, LA.

The Spine Center, University of Colorado Hospital, Denver, CO.

出版信息

Clin Interv Aging. 2017 Sep 6;12:1409-1417. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S143503. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lumbar spinal stenosis is the most common indication for spine surgery in older adults. Interspinous process decompression (IPD) using a stand-alone spacer that functions as an extension blocker offers a minimally invasive treatment option for intermittent neurogenic claudication associated with spinal stenosis.

METHODS

This study evaluated the 5-year clinical outcomes for IPD (Superion) from a randomized controlled US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) noninferiority trial. Outcomes included Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) symptom severity (ss), physical function (pf), and patient satisfaction (ps) subdomains, leg and back pain visual analog scale (VAS), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).

RESULTS

At 5 years, 84% of patients (74 of 88) demonstrated clinical success on at least two of three ZCQ domains. Individual ZCQ domain success rates were 75% (66 of 88), 81% (71 of 88), and 90% (79 of 88) for ZCQss, ZCQpf, and ZCQps, respectively. Leg and back pain success rates were 80% (68 of 85) and 65% (55 of 85), respectively, and the success rate for ODI was 65% (57 of 88). Percentage improvements over baseline were 42%, 39%, 75%, 66%, and 58% for ZCQss, ZCQpf, leg and back pain VAS, and ODI, respectively (all <0.001). Within-group effect sizes were classified as very large for four of five clinical outcomes (ie, >1.0; all <0.0001). Seventy-five percent of IPD patients were free from reoperation, revision, or supplemental fixation at their index level at 5 years.

CONCLUSION

After 5 years of follow-up, IPD with a stand-alone spacer provides sustained clinical benefit.

摘要

背景

腰椎管狭窄症是老年人脊柱手术最常见的适应证。使用作为伸展阻挡器的独立间隔器进行棘突间减压(IPD)为与椎管狭窄相关的间歇性神经源性跛行提供了一种微创治疗选择。

方法

本研究评估了来自美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)一项随机对照非劣效性试验的IPD(Superion)的5年临床结局。结局包括苏黎世跛行问卷(ZCQ)症状严重程度(ss)、身体功能(pf)和患者满意度(ps)子域、腿部和背部疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)以及奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数(ODI)。

结果

在5年时,84%的患者(88例中的74例)在ZCQ三个域中的至少两个域上显示出临床成功。ZCQ各域的成功率分别为:ZCQss为75%(88例中的66例),ZCQpf为81%(88例中的71例),ZCQps为90%(88例中的79例)。腿部和背部疼痛的成功率分别为80%(85例中的68例)和65%(85例中的55例),ODI的成功率为65%(88例中的57例)。与基线相比,ZCQss、ZCQpf、腿部和背部疼痛VAS以及ODI的改善百分比分别为42%、39%、75%、66%和58%(均P<0.001)。在五项临床结局中的四项中,组内效应量被分类为非常大(即>1.0;均P<0.0001)。75%的IPD患者在5年时在其初次手术节段无需再次手术、翻修或补充固定。

结论

经过5年的随访,使用独立间隔器的IPD提供了持续的临床益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/162c/5593396/67fa3b9deea5/cia-12-1409Fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Five-year durability of stand-alone interspinous process decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Clin Interv Aging. 2017 Sep 6;12:1409-1417. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S143503. eCollection 2017.
2
Superion Interspinous Spacer Treatment of Moderate Spinal Stenosis: 4-Year Results.
World Neurosurg. 2017 Aug;104:279-283. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.04.163. Epub 2017 May 4.
3
Stand-alone interspinous spacer versus decompressive laminectomy for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2015;12(6):763-9. doi: 10.1586/17434440.2015.1100071. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
9
Interspinous Process Decompression: Expanding Treatment Options for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:3267307. doi: 10.1155/2016/3267307. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
10
Aperius interspinous implant versus open surgical decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis.
Spine J. 2011 Oct;11(10):933-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.08.419.

引用本文的文献

1
An Algorithmic Overview of Advanced Pain Therapies: A Narrative Review.
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2025 Jan 27;29(1):36. doi: 10.1007/s11916-024-01343-2.
6
Neurosurgical Management of Interspinous Device Complications: A Case Series.
Front Surg. 2022 Mar 16;9:841134. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.841134. eCollection 2022.
10
Current concepts of spondylosis and posterior spinal motion preservation for radiologists.
Skeletal Radiol. 2021 Nov;50(11):2169-2184. doi: 10.1007/s00256-021-03840-6. Epub 2021 Jun 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Interspinous Process Decompression: Expanding Treatment Options for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:3267307. doi: 10.1155/2016/3267307. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
2
Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 14;374(15):1424-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1508788.
4
Stand-alone interspinous spacer versus decompressive laminectomy for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2015;12(6):763-9. doi: 10.1586/17434440.2015.1100071. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
7
Using Effect Size-or Why the P Value Is Not Enough.
J Grad Med Educ. 2012 Sep;4(3):279-82. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-12-00156.1.
9
Treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a balancing act.
Spine J. 2010 Jul;10(7):625-7. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.05.006.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验