Pal Dilip Kumar, Sanki Prakash Kumar, Roy Sayak
Department of Urology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Department of Cardio Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Urol Ann. 2017 Apr-Jun;9(2):166-169. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.204176.
In renal transplantation, there is end-to-side anastomosis of renal artery to external iliac artery and end-to-end anastomosis of renal artery to internal iliac artery. The end-to-end internal iliac artery anastomosis can be associated with complications due to compromised distal vascular supply to limbs and penile erectile tissue. A method of end-to-side anastomosis can overcome them. Till date, there is no case series or trial that has studied the effect of end-to-side anastomosis. This study is aimed at comparing the outcome of end-to-side and end-to-end anastomosis, so as to evaluate the efficacy of end-to-side technique.
A total of 40 renal transplant recipients were taken, with internal iliac artery anastomosis, and were divided into two groups, 20 patients with end-to-end and 20 patients with end-to-side anastomosis. The cold ischemia time, arterial anastomosis time, post-operative bleeding and urine leak, claudication, saddle anesthesia and erectile dysfunction, and follow-up recipient creatinine and eGFR and Doppler to look for graft renal artery patency (at 6 months post-transplant) were compared between the two groups.
The intraoperative cold ischemia time was slightly more in the group with end-to-end anastomosis, but it was statistically significant ( = 0.22). The arterial anastomosis time was comparable in both the groups ( = 0.65). In the end-to-end group, 15%, 20% and 15% patients had post-operative saddle anaesthesia, claudication and mild-to-moderate erectile dysfunction, which were absent in the end-to-side group. On follow-up, the mean recipient serum creatinine and eGFR were comparable in the two groups. Also, the graft renal artery patency on Doppler was comparable.
The end-to-side technique can be definitely applied for renal transplantation, with some advantages over end-to-end technique, and without compromising efficacy.
在肾移植中,肾动脉与髂外动脉采用端侧吻合,肾动脉与髂内动脉采用端端吻合。髂内动脉端端吻合可能因下肢和阴茎勃起组织的远端血管供应受损而引发并发症。一种端侧吻合方法可以克服这些问题。迄今为止,尚无病例系列或试验研究端侧吻合的效果。本研究旨在比较端侧吻合与端端吻合的结果,以评估端侧技术的疗效。
共纳入40例接受髂内动脉吻合的肾移植受者,分为两组,每组20例,一组采用端端吻合,另一组采用端侧吻合。比较两组的冷缺血时间、动脉吻合时间、术后出血和尿漏、跛行、鞍区麻醉和勃起功能障碍,以及随访时受者的肌酐、估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)和多普勒检查以评估移植肾动脉通畅情况(移植后6个月)。
端端吻合组术中冷缺血时间略长,但差异有统计学意义(P = 0.22)。两组动脉吻合时间相当(P = 0.65)。端端吻合组中,15%、20%和15%的患者术后出现鞍区麻醉、跛行和轻至中度勃起功能障碍,而端侧吻合组未出现这些情况。随访时,两组受者血清肌酐均值和eGFR相当。此外,两组移植肾动脉在多普勒检查下的通畅情况相当。
端侧技术可明确应用于肾移植,相较于端端技术具有一些优势,且不影响疗效。