Calvin-Naylor Nancy A, Jones Carolynn Thomas, Wartak Michelle M, Blackwell Karen, Davis Jonathan M, Divecha Ruthvick, Ellerbeck Edward F, Kieburtz Karl, Koziel Margaret J, Luzuriaga Katherine, Maddox Jennifer, Needler Nancy A, Murphy Susan, Pemberton Kieran, Radovich Catherine, Rubinstein Eric P, Selker Harry P, Tenaerts Pamela, Unsworth Kelly, Wilson Kay, Wright Jonelle E, Barohn Richard, Shanley Thomas P
Institute for Research on Innovation and Science (IRIS), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
College of Nursing, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2017 Feb;1(1):16-25. doi: 10.1017/cts.2016.2. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
Training for the clinical research workforce does not sufficiently prepare workers for today's scientific complexity; deficiencies may be ameliorated with training. The Enhancing Clinical Research Professionals' Training and Qualifications developed competency standards for principal investigators and clinical research coordinators.
Clinical and Translational Science Awards representatives refined competency statements. Working groups developed assessments, identified training, and highlighted gaps.
Forty-eight competency statements in 8 domains were developed.
Training is primarily investigator focused with few programs for clinical research coordinators. Lack of training is felt in new technologies and data management. There are no standardized assessments of competence.
临床研究人员的培训未能充分使工作人员为当今的科学复杂性做好准备;通过培训或许可以改善这些不足。“提升临床研究专业人员培训与资质”项目制定了主要研究者和临床研究协调员的能力标准。
临床与转化科学奖代表完善了能力陈述。工作组制定了评估方法,确定了培训内容,并突出了差距。
在8个领域制定了48项能力陈述。
培训主要以研究者为重点,针对临床研究协调员的项目很少。在新技术和数据管理方面存在培训不足的情况。目前尚无能力的标准化评估。