Department of Urology, Gachon University Gil Hospital, Incheon, Korea.
Department of Preventive Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Gachon University, Incheon, Korea.
Investig Clin Urol. 2017 May;58(3):200-204. doi: 10.4111/icu.2017.58.3.200. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
To analyze postoperative outcomes of prostate surgery, resected specimen weight is commonly used. The difference between the preoperative calculated transitional zone volume and actual enucleated specimen weight following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is reported at over 20%. The reason for this difference is unclear. We assessed the association of volume of the prostatic adenoma with enucleated weight, the volume and calculated volume of the adenoma by pre- and postoperative ultrasonographic measurement.
All patients were prospectively enrolled who underwent HoLEP by two surgeons (SJO and JKO) between 2010 and 2015. Preoperative and postoperative prostate ultrasonography examinations were performed by a single examiner (JKO) during surgery, and weight and volume of the enucleated adenoma were measured. We compared preoperative adenoma size with postoperative weight and volume of the enucleated adenoma, calculated enucleated volume using ultrasonography, and calculated the correlation coefficients between preoperative adenoma volume and postoperative parameters.
One hundred forty-two patients with a mean age (±standard deviation) of 69.8 (±8.8) years were analyzed. The mean preoperative ultrasound-measured adenoma volume was 31.7 (±21.4) mL, while postoperatively the mean retrieved weight of the adenoma was 22.3 (±17.0) g and the mean volume was 22.3 (±16.8) mL. Postoperatively calculated enucleated volume using ultrasonography was most strongly correlated with preoperative adenoma size (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.965, p<0.01).
Our study showed a significant difference between preoperative adenoma size and postoperative enucleated weight of adenoma during HoLEP. Postoperatively calculated enucleated volume using ultrasonography may be the most reliable parameter to assess surgical outcomes following HoLEP.
分析前列腺手术后的结果,通常使用切除标本的重量。钬激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)后,术前计算的移行区体积与实际切除的标本重量之间的差异超过 20%。这种差异的原因尚不清楚。我们评估了前列腺腺瘤的体积与切除重量、术前和术后超声测量的腺瘤体积和计算体积之间的关系。
所有患者均前瞻性纳入,于 2010 年至 2015 年间由两位外科医生(SJO 和 JKO)行 HoLEP。由一名外科医生(JKO)在手术期间进行术前和术后前列腺超声检查,并测量切除的腺瘤的重量和体积。我们比较了术前腺瘤大小与切除的腺瘤的术后重量和体积、使用超声计算的切除体积,并计算了术前腺瘤体积与术后参数之间的相关系数。
分析了 142 例年龄(±标准差)为 69.8(±8.8)岁的患者。术前超声测量的腺瘤体积平均为 31.7(±21.4)mL,术后切除的腺瘤平均重量为 22.3(±17.0)g,平均体积为 22.3(±16.8)mL。使用超声计算的术后切除体积与术前腺瘤大小相关性最强(Pearson 相关系数 0.965,p<0.01)。
我们的研究表明,在 HoLEP 中,术前腺瘤大小与术后切除的腺瘤重量之间存在显著差异。使用超声计算的术后切除体积可能是评估 HoLEP 后手术结果最可靠的参数。