• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation Considerations for Secondary Uses of Clinical Data: Principles for an Evidence-based Approach to Policy and Implementation of Secondary Analysis.临床数据二次利用的评估考量:基于证据的二次分析政策与实施方法原则
Yearb Med Inform. 2017 Aug;26(1):59-67. doi: 10.15265/IY-2017-010. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
6
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.探索执业护士教育的概念和理论框架:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.
7
Evaluating visual analytics for health informatics applications: a systematic review from the American Medical Informatics Association Visual Analytics Working Group Task Force on Evaluation.评估健康信息学应用中的可视化分析:来自美国医学信息学协会可视化分析工作组任务组评估的系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Apr 1;26(4):314-323. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy190.
8
A protocol for evaluating a multi-level implementation theory to scale-up obstetric triage in referral hospitals in Ghana.评估多层面实施理论以扩大加纳转诊医院产科分诊规模的方案。
Implement Sci. 2020 May 12;15(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-00992-2.
9
How can Big Data Analytics Support People-Centred and Integrated Health Services: A Scoping Review.大数据分析如何支持以人为主的综合健康服务:一项范围综述
Int J Integr Care. 2022 Jun 16;22(2):23. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5543. eCollection 2022 Apr-Jun.
10
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.

引用本文的文献

1
Hospital length of stay prediction tools for all hospital admissions and general medicine populations: systematic review and meta-analysis.适用于所有住院患者和普通内科人群的住院时间预测工具:系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Aug 16;10:1192969. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1192969. eCollection 2023.
2
The Experience of Establishing Data Sharing & Linkage Platforms for Administrative, Research and Community-Service Data.建立行政、研究和社区服务数据共享与联动平台的经验
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2019 Feb 13;4(1):465. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v4i1.465.
3
Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Target Attainment in Patients With Established Cardiovascular Disease: Analysis of Routine Care Data.已确诊心血管疾病患者的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇目标达成情况:常规护理数据分析
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Apr 2;8(4):e16400. doi: 10.2196/16400.
4
Facilitating action planning within audit and feedback interventions: a mixed-methods process evaluation of an action implementation toolbox in intensive care.促进审核和反馈干预措施中的行动计划制定:一项关于重症监护中行动实施工具包的混合方法过程评估。
Implement Sci. 2019 Sep 18;14(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0937-8.
5
The impact of health information technology on the management and follow-up of test results - a systematic review.健康信息技术对检验结果管理和随访的影响——系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Jul 1;26(7):678-688. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz032.
6
The Safe and Effective Use of Shared Data Underpinned by Stakeholder Engagement and Evaluation Practice.通过利益相关者参与和评估实践实现共享数据的安全有效使用。
Yearb Med Inform. 2018 Aug;27(1):25-28. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1641194. Epub 2018 Apr 22.
7
Exploring nurses' experience about facilitating factors in medication administration based on clinical judgment of nurses: A content analysis.基于护士临床判断探索护士在给药过程中促进因素的经验:一项内容分析。
Electron Physician. 2017 Dec 25;9(12):6063-6071. doi: 10.19082/6063. eCollection 2017 Dec.
8
Association between borderline dysnatremia and mortality insight into a new data mining approach.边缘性血钠异常与死亡率的关联:一种新的数据挖掘方法的见解。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Nov 22;17(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0549-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Informatics for Health 2017: Advancing both science and practice.2017年健康信息学:推动科学与实践发展。
J Innov Health Inform. 2017 Apr 21;24(1):1-185. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v24i1.939.
2
Public Attitudes toward Consent and Data Sharing in Biobank Research: A Large Multi-site Experimental Survey in the US.公众对生物样本库研究中的知情同意和数据共享的态度:美国一项大型多地点实验性调查
Am J Hum Genet. 2017 Mar 2;100(3):414-427. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.01.021. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
3
Evaluating common data models for use with a longitudinal community registry.评估用于纵向社区登记处的通用数据模型。
J Biomed Inform. 2016 Dec;64:333-341. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.10.016. Epub 2016 Oct 29.
4
The computer will assess you now.计算机现在将对你进行评估。
BMJ. 2016 Oct 24;355:i5680. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5680.
5
Optimizing Digital Health Informatics Interventions Through Unobtrusive Quantitative Process Evaluations.通过非侵入性定量过程评估优化数字健康信息学干预措施
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;228:594-8.
6
Evidence-based Health Informatics and the Scientific Development of the Field.循证健康信息学与该领域的科学发展
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;222:14-24.
7
Public preferences for electronic health data storage, access, and sharing - evidence from a pan-European survey.公众对电子健康数据存储、访问和共享的偏好——来自泛欧调查的证据。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Nov;23(6):1096-1106. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw012. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
8
Improving the relevance and consistency of outcomes in comparative effectiveness research.提高比较效益研究结果的相关性和一致性。
J Comp Eff Res. 2016 Mar;5(2):193-205. doi: 10.2217/cer-2015-0007. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
9
SPIRIT: Systematic Planning of Intelligent Reuse of Integrated Clinical Routine Data. A Conceptual Best-practice Framework and Procedure Model.SPIRIT:综合临床常规数据智能再利用的系统规划。一个概念性的最佳实践框架和程序模型。
Methods Inf Med. 2016;55(2):114-24. doi: 10.3414/ME15-01-0045. Epub 2016 Jan 15.
10
Measuring and improving patient safety through health information technology: The Health IT Safety Framework.通过健康信息技术衡量和改善患者安全:健康信息技术安全框架。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Apr;25(4):226-32. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004486. Epub 2015 Sep 14.

临床数据二次利用的评估考量:基于证据的二次分析政策与实施方法原则

Evaluation Considerations for Secondary Uses of Clinical Data: Principles for an Evidence-based Approach to Policy and Implementation of Secondary Analysis.

作者信息

Scott P J, Rigby M, Ammenwerth E, McNair J Brender, Georgiou A, Hyppönen H, de Keizer N, Magrabi F, Nykänen P, Gude W T, Hackl W

出版信息

Yearb Med Inform. 2017 Aug;26(1):59-67. doi: 10.15265/IY-2017-010. Epub 2017 Sep 11.

DOI:10.15265/IY-2017-010
PMID:28480477
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6239220/
Abstract

To set the scientific context and then suggest principles for an evidence-based approach to secondary uses of clinical data, covering both evaluation of the secondary uses of data and evaluation of health systems and services based upon secondary uses of data. Working Group review of selected literature and policy approaches. We present important considerations in the evaluation of secondary uses of clinical data from the angles of governance and trust, theory, semantics, and policy. We make the case for a multi-level and multi-factorial approach to the evaluation of secondary uses of clinical data and describe a methodological framework for best practice. We emphasise the importance of evaluating the governance of secondary uses of health data in maintaining trust, which is essential for such uses. We also offer examples of the re-use of routine health data to demonstrate how it can support evaluation of clinical performance and optimize health IT system design. Great expectations are resting upon "Big Data" and innovative analytics. However, to build and maintain public trust, improve data reliability, and assure the validity of analytic inferences, there must be independent and transparent evaluation. A mature and evidence-based approach needs not merely data science, but must be guided by the broader concerns of applied health informatics.

摘要

为了设定科学背景,进而提出基于证据的临床数据二次利用方法的原则,涵盖数据二次利用的评估以及基于数据二次利用的卫生系统和服务评估。工作组对选定的文献和政策方法进行审查。我们从治理与信任、理论、语义和政策等角度,阐述临床数据二次利用评估中的重要考量因素。我们主张采用多层次、多因素的方法来评估临床数据的二次利用,并描述最佳实践的方法框架。我们强调评估卫生数据二次利用治理对于维持信任的重要性,而信任对于此类利用至关重要。我们还提供常规卫生数据再利用的示例,以展示其如何支持临床绩效评估并优化卫生信息技术系统设计。人们对“大数据”和创新分析寄予厚望。然而,为了建立和维护公众信任、提高数据可靠性并确保分析推断的有效性,必须进行独立且透明的评估。一种成熟且基于证据的方法不仅需要数据科学,还必须以应用卫生信息学的更广泛关注点为指导。