Suppr超能文献

药物合法化和非使用个体中的药物非刑罪化信念。

Drug Legalization and Decriminalization Beliefs Among Substance-using and Nonusing Individuals.

机构信息

Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit (BPRU), Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

J Addict Med. 2020 Jan/Feb;14(1):56-62. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000542.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

There has been advocacy for legalization of abusable substances, but systematic data on societal beliefs regarding such legalization are limited. People who use substances may have unique beliefs about legalization, and this study assessed whether they would be in favor of drug legalization/decriminalization. It was hypothesized that those who use particular drugs (especially marijuana) would support its legalization/decriminalization, but that this would not be the case across all classes (especially opioids and stimulants).

METHODS

A nationwide sample of 506 adults were surveyed online to assess demographic characteristics, substance misuse, and beliefs regarding drug legalization/decriminalization. Legalization/decriminalization beliefs for specific drugs were assessed on an 11-point scale (0, strongly disagree; 10, strongly agree).

RESULTS

For persons with opioid misuse (15.4%), when asked about their agreement with: "heroin should be legalized," the mean score was 4.6 (SEE = 0.4; neutral). For persons with stimulant misuse (12.1%), when asked about their agreement with: "cocaine should be legalized," the score was 4.2 (0.5). However, for persons with marijuana misuse (34.0%), when asked about their agreement with: "medical marijuana should be legalized" the score was 8.2 (0.3; indicating agreement), and for "recreational marijuana" the score was also 8.2 (0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that persons who used marijuana strongly support the legalization of both recreational and medical marijuana, whereas persons who primarily have opioid or stimulant misuse have less strongly held beliefs about legalization of substances within those respective categories. By including those who misuse drugs, these data assist in framing discussions of drug legalization and have the potential to inform drug policy considerations.

摘要

目的

有主张将滥用物质合法化,但关于这种合法化的社会信仰的系统数据有限。使用物质的人可能对合法化有独特的看法,本研究评估了他们是否赞成毒品合法化/非刑罪化。假设那些使用特定药物(特别是大麻)的人会支持其合法化/非刑罪化,但并非所有类别(特别是阿片类药物和兴奋剂)都如此。

方法

通过在线调查对全国范围内的 506 名成年人进行抽样调查,以评估人口统计学特征、药物滥用情况以及对毒品合法化/非刑罪化的看法。特定药物的合法化/非刑罪化信念通过 11 点量表进行评估(0,强烈不同意;10,强烈同意)。

结果

对于阿片类药物滥用者(15.4%),当被问及他们对以下内容的同意程度时:“海洛因应该合法化”,平均得分为 4.6(SEE=0.4;中立)。对于兴奋剂滥用者(12.1%),当被问及他们对以下内容的同意程度时:“可卡因应该合法化”,得分为 4.2(0.5)。然而,对于大麻滥用者(34.0%),当被问及他们对以下内容的同意程度时:“医用大麻应该合法化”,得分为 8.2(0.3;表示同意),而对于“娱乐用大麻”,得分为 8.2(0.3)。

结论

这些结果表明,使用大麻的人强烈支持娱乐用和医用大麻的合法化,而主要滥用阿片类药物或兴奋剂的人对各自类别中物质的合法化持有较弱的信念。通过纳入那些滥用药物的人,这些数据有助于构建关于毒品合法化的讨论,并有可能为毒品政策考虑提供信息。

相似文献

1
Drug Legalization and Decriminalization Beliefs Among Substance-using and Nonusing Individuals.
J Addict Med. 2020 Jan/Feb;14(1):56-62. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000542.
2
Recreational marijuana legalization and prescription opioids received by Medicaid enrollees.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Jan 1;194:13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.09.016. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
4
Impact of Medical Marijuana Legalization on Opioid Use, Chronic Opioid Use, and High-risk Opioid Use.
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Aug;34(8):1419-1426. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4782-2. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
5
Support for marijuana legalization in the US state of Washington has continued to increase through 2016.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Jun 1;175:205-209. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.02.015. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
6
Medical marijuana legalization and associated illicit drug use and prescription medication misuse among adolescents in the U.S.
Addict Behav. 2019 Mar;90:48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.10.017. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
8
Marijuana Legalization and Youth.
Pediatrics. 2020 May;145(Suppl 2):S165-S174. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-2056D.
10
The impact of cannabis legalization and decriminalization on acute poisoning: A systematic review.
Addiction. 2023 Dec;118(12):2252-2274. doi: 10.1111/add.16280. Epub 2023 Jul 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Resident perspectives on a pre-booking diversion program.
Contemp Drug Probl. 2024 Jun;51(2):129-141. doi: 10.1177/00914509241246083. Epub 2024 Apr 24.

本文引用的文献

1
The Canadian Cannabis Act legalizes and regulates recreational cannabis use in 2018.
Health Policy. 2018 Mar;122(3):205-209. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.01.009. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
2
The future of the international drug control system and national drug prohibitions.
Addiction. 2018 Jul;113(7):1210-1223. doi: 10.1111/add.13941. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
3
Marijuana policy opinions in Washington state since legalization: Would voters vote the same way?
Contemp Drug Probl. 2016 Dec;43(4):369-380. doi: 10.1177/0091450916667081. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
4
Cannabis use, attitudes, and legal status in the U.S.: A review.
Prev Med. 2017 Nov;104:13-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.07.008. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
5
Update on pharmacotherapy for treatment of opioid use disorder.
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2016 Dec;17(17):2307-2318. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2016.1244529. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
6
Conducting Clinical Research Using Crowdsourced Convenience Samples.
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2016;12:53-81. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093623. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
8
A social cost perspective in the wake of the Portuguese strategy for the fight against drugs.
Int J Drug Policy. 2015 Feb;26(2):199-209. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.08.017. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
9
Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk.
Behav Res Methods. 2014 Dec;46(4):1023-31. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0434-y.
10
Legalizing a market for cannabis for pleasure: Colorado, Washington, Uruguay and beyond.
Addiction. 2014 Mar;109(3):345-51. doi: 10.1111/add.12355. Epub 2013 Nov 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验