Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit (BPRU), Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
J Addict Med. 2020 Jan/Feb;14(1):56-62. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000542.
There has been advocacy for legalization of abusable substances, but systematic data on societal beliefs regarding such legalization are limited. People who use substances may have unique beliefs about legalization, and this study assessed whether they would be in favor of drug legalization/decriminalization. It was hypothesized that those who use particular drugs (especially marijuana) would support its legalization/decriminalization, but that this would not be the case across all classes (especially opioids and stimulants).
A nationwide sample of 506 adults were surveyed online to assess demographic characteristics, substance misuse, and beliefs regarding drug legalization/decriminalization. Legalization/decriminalization beliefs for specific drugs were assessed on an 11-point scale (0, strongly disagree; 10, strongly agree).
For persons with opioid misuse (15.4%), when asked about their agreement with: "heroin should be legalized," the mean score was 4.6 (SEE = 0.4; neutral). For persons with stimulant misuse (12.1%), when asked about their agreement with: "cocaine should be legalized," the score was 4.2 (0.5). However, for persons with marijuana misuse (34.0%), when asked about their agreement with: "medical marijuana should be legalized" the score was 8.2 (0.3; indicating agreement), and for "recreational marijuana" the score was also 8.2 (0.3).
These results suggest that persons who used marijuana strongly support the legalization of both recreational and medical marijuana, whereas persons who primarily have opioid or stimulant misuse have less strongly held beliefs about legalization of substances within those respective categories. By including those who misuse drugs, these data assist in framing discussions of drug legalization and have the potential to inform drug policy considerations.
有主张将滥用物质合法化,但关于这种合法化的社会信仰的系统数据有限。使用物质的人可能对合法化有独特的看法,本研究评估了他们是否赞成毒品合法化/非刑罪化。假设那些使用特定药物(特别是大麻)的人会支持其合法化/非刑罪化,但并非所有类别(特别是阿片类药物和兴奋剂)都如此。
通过在线调查对全国范围内的 506 名成年人进行抽样调查,以评估人口统计学特征、药物滥用情况以及对毒品合法化/非刑罪化的看法。特定药物的合法化/非刑罪化信念通过 11 点量表进行评估(0,强烈不同意;10,强烈同意)。
对于阿片类药物滥用者(15.4%),当被问及他们对以下内容的同意程度时:“海洛因应该合法化”,平均得分为 4.6(SEE=0.4;中立)。对于兴奋剂滥用者(12.1%),当被问及他们对以下内容的同意程度时:“可卡因应该合法化”,得分为 4.2(0.5)。然而,对于大麻滥用者(34.0%),当被问及他们对以下内容的同意程度时:“医用大麻应该合法化”,得分为 8.2(0.3;表示同意),而对于“娱乐用大麻”,得分为 8.2(0.3)。
这些结果表明,使用大麻的人强烈支持娱乐用和医用大麻的合法化,而主要滥用阿片类药物或兴奋剂的人对各自类别中物质的合法化持有较弱的信念。通过纳入那些滥用药物的人,这些数据有助于构建关于毒品合法化的讨论,并有可能为毒品政策考虑提供信息。