Suppr超能文献

一项随机对照试验的效果:比较研究人员实施的治疗和学校实施的治疗对有严重阅读困难的四年级学生的影响。

Effects From a Randomized Control Trial Comparing Researcher and School-Implemented Treatments With Fourth Graders With Significant Reading Difficulties.

作者信息

Vaughn Sharon, Solís Michael, Miciak Jeremy, Taylor W Pat, Fletcher Jack M

机构信息

The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.

University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA and The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.

出版信息

J Res Educ Eff. 2016;9(Suppl 1):23-44. doi: 10.1080/19345747.2015.1126386. Epub 2016 Jan 6.

Abstract

This study examined the effectiveness of a researcher-provided intervention with 4th-graders with significant reading difficulties. The intervention emphasized multi-syllable word reading, fluent reading of high frequency words and phrases, vocabulary, and comprehension. To identify the participants, 1,695 fourth grade students were screened using the Gates MacGinitie Reading Test, and those whose standard score was 85 or lower were included in the study (N=485). Participants were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either researcher-provided intervention (n=324) or intervention provided by school personnel (business as usual, BAU) (n=161). Findings revealed no statistically significant differences between students in the researcher-provided intervention and BAU groups. Using effect sizes as an indicator of impact, students in the researcher implemented treatment generally outperformed students in the school implemented treatment (BAU). Examining growth in standard scores, both groups made significant gains in reading outcomes with standard score growth from pretest to posttest of 3 standard score points on decoding, 5 on fluency,, and 2.0 to 7 standard score points on reading comprehension measures.

摘要

本研究考察了研究人员为有严重阅读困难的四年级学生提供的干预措施的有效性。该干预措施强调多音节单词阅读、高频单词和短语的流畅阅读、词汇以及阅读理解。为了确定参与者,使用盖茨-麦吉尼蒂阅读测试对1695名四年级学生进行了筛查,标准分数为85分或更低的学生被纳入研究(N = 485)。参与者被随机分配(2:1)接受研究人员提供的干预(n = 324)或学校工作人员提供的干预(照常进行,BAU)(n = 161)。研究结果显示,接受研究人员提供干预的学生组和照常进行组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。以效应量作为影响指标,研究人员实施的治疗组学生总体上比学校实施的治疗组(照常进行)学生表现更好。检查标准分数的增长情况,两组在阅读成绩方面都取得了显著进步,从前测到后测,解码的标准分数增长了3分,流畅性增长了5分,阅读理解测量的标准分数增长了2.0至7分。

相似文献

2
Efficacy of a Word- and Text-Based Intervention for Students With Significant Reading Difficulties.
J Learn Disabil. 2019 Jan/Feb;52(1):31-44. doi: 10.1177/0022219418775113. Epub 2018 May 23.
3
The Effects of One versus Two Years of Intensive Reading Intervention Implemented with Late Elementary Struggling Readers.
Learn Disabil Res Pract. 2018 Feb;33(1):24-36. doi: 10.1111/ldrp.12159. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
4
Problem Behaviors and Response to Reading Intervention for Upper Elementary Students With Reading Difficulties.
Remedial Spec Educ. 2021 Jun 1;42(3):169-181. doi: 10.1177/0741932519865263. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
5
Response to intervention for high school students: examining baseline word reading skills and reading comprehension outcomes.
Ann Dyslexia. 2022 Jul;72(2):324-340. doi: 10.1007/s11881-022-00253-5. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
8
High School Students With Reading Comprehension Difficulties: Results of a Randomized Control Trial of a Two-Year Reading Intervention.
J Learn Disabil. 2015 Sep-Oct;48(5):546-58. doi: 10.1177/0022219413515511. Epub 2014 Jan 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Timed and untimed writing and math: shared and differential cognitive predictors in primary school.
Child Neuropsychol. 2025 Mar 12:1-25. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2025.2477733.
3
Examining the Reading and Cognitive Profiles of Students With Significant Reading Comprehension Difficulties.
Learn Disabil Q. 2021 Aug;44(3):183-196. doi: 10.1177/0731948721989973. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
5
Effects of Reading Interventions Implemented for Upper Elementary Struggling Readers: A Look at Recent Research.
Read Writ. 2021 Oct;34(8):1943-1977. doi: 10.1007/s11145-021-10123-y. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
7
The Structure of Processing Speed in Children and its Impact on Reading.
J Cogn Dev. 2021;22(1):84-107. doi: 10.1080/15248372.2020.1862121. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
10
The Critical Role of Word Reading as a Predictor of Response to Intervention.
J Learn Disabil. 2020 Nov/Dec;53(6):415-427. doi: 10.1177/0022219419891412. Epub 2019 Dec 6.

本文引用的文献

2
High School Students With Reading Comprehension Difficulties: Results of a Randomized Control Trial of a Two-Year Reading Intervention.
J Learn Disabil. 2015 Sep-Oct;48(5):546-58. doi: 10.1177/0022219413515511. Epub 2014 Jan 6.
4
A Meta-Analysis of Interventions for Struggling Readers in Grades 4-12: 1980-2011.
J Learn Disabil. 2015 Jul-Aug;48(4):369-90. doi: 10.1177/0022219413504995. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
5
Reading skill components and impairments in middle school struggling readers.
Read Writ. 2013 Aug;26(7):1059-1086. doi: 10.1007/s11145-012-9406-3.
6
Effects of a Tier 2 Supplemental Reading Intervention for At-Risk Fourth Grade Students.
Except Child. 2012 Spring;78(3):318-334. doi: 10.1177/001440291207800304. Epub 2012 Feb 13.
7
Response to intervention with secondary school students with reading difficulties.
J Learn Disabil. 2012 May-Jun;45(3):244-56. doi: 10.1177/0022219412442157. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
8
Effects of intensive reading intervention for eighth-grade students with persistently inadequate response to intervention.
J Learn Disabil. 2012 Nov-Dec;45(6):515-25. doi: 10.1177/0022219411402692. Epub 2011 Apr 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验