• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

曲线吸引力:探索对曲线与棱角物体偏好的个体差异

Curve Appeal: Exploring Individual Differences in Preference for Curved Versus Angular Objects.

作者信息

Cotter Katherine N, Silvia Paul J, Bertamini Marco, Palumbo Letizia, Vartanian Oshin

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, NC, USA.

University of Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

Iperception. 2017 Apr 3;8(2):2041669517693023. doi: 10.1177/2041669517693023. eCollection 2017 Mar-Apr.

DOI:10.1177/2041669517693023
PMID:28491269
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5405906/
Abstract

A preference for smooth curvature, as opposed to angularity, is a well-established finding for lines, two-dimensional shapes, and complex objects, but little is known about individual differences. We used two-dimensional black-and-white shapes-randomly generated irregular polygons, and arrays of circles and hexagons-and measured many individual differences, including artistic expertise, personality, and cognitive style. As expected, people preferred curved over angular stimuli, and people's degree of curvature preference correlated across the two sets of shapes. Multilevel models showed varying patterns of interaction between shape and individual differences. For the irregular polygons, people higher in artistic expertise or openness to experience showed a greater preference for curvature. This pattern was not evident for the arrays of circles and hexagons. We discuss the results in relation to the nature of the stimuli, and we conclude that individual differences do play a role in moderating the preference for smooth curvature.

摘要

与棱角分明相比,对平滑曲率的偏好是关于线条、二维形状和复杂物体的一个既定发现,但对于个体差异却知之甚少。我们使用二维黑白形状——随机生成的不规则多边形以及圆形和六边形阵列——并测量了许多个体差异,包括艺术专长、个性和认知风格。不出所料,人们更喜欢曲线形而非棱角形刺激,并且人们的曲率偏好程度在两组形状之间具有相关性。多层次模型显示了形状与个体差异之间不同的相互作用模式。对于不规则多边形,艺术专长较高或体验开放性较高的人对曲率表现出更大的偏好。这种模式在圆形和六边形阵列中并不明显。我们结合刺激的性质讨论了结果,并得出结论,个体差异在调节对平滑曲率的偏好方面确实发挥了作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0639/5405906/2ffaba55fa19/10.1177_2041669517693023-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0639/5405906/063542151016/10.1177_2041669517693023-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0639/5405906/0732cdd23226/10.1177_2041669517693023-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0639/5405906/2ffaba55fa19/10.1177_2041669517693023-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0639/5405906/063542151016/10.1177_2041669517693023-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0639/5405906/0732cdd23226/10.1177_2041669517693023-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0639/5405906/2ffaba55fa19/10.1177_2041669517693023-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Curve Appeal: Exploring Individual Differences in Preference for Curved Versus Angular Objects.曲线吸引力:探索对曲线与棱角物体偏好的个体差异
Iperception. 2017 Apr 3;8(2):2041669517693023. doi: 10.1177/2041669517693023. eCollection 2017 Mar-Apr.
2
Shape familiarity modulates preference for curvature in drawings of common-use objects.形状熟悉度会调节对常用物体绘图中曲率的偏好。
PeerJ. 2021 Jul 6;9:e11772. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11772. eCollection 2021.
3
Do observers like curvature or do they dislike angularity?观察者喜欢曲线还是不喜欢棱角?
Br J Psychol. 2016 Feb;107(1):154-78. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12132. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
4
The role of gender and academic degree on preference for smooth curvature of abstract shapes.性别和学术程度对抽象形状平滑曲率偏好的作用。
PeerJ. 2021 Mar 9;9:e10877. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10877. eCollection 2021.
5
An advantage for smooth compared with angular contours in the speed of processing shape.与具有角状轮廓相比,光滑轮廓在处理形状的速度上具有优势。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Oct;45(10):1304-1318. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000669. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
6
Comparing Angular and Curved Shapes in Terms of Implicit Associations and Approach/Avoidance Responses.从内隐联想和趋近/回避反应方面比较角形和曲线形状。
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 13;10(10):e0140043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140043. eCollection 2015.
7
Angular Versus Curved Shapes: Correspondences and Emotional Processing.角形与曲线形状:对应关系及情感加工
Perception. 2018 Jan;47(1):67-89. doi: 10.1177/0301006617731048. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
8
The effects of presentation time on preference for curvature of real objects and meaningless novel patterns.呈现时间对真实物体曲率和无意义新图案偏好的影响。
Br J Psychol. 2019 Nov;110(4):670-685. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12367. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
9
The contour effect: Differences in the aesthetic preference and stress response to photo-realistic living environments.轮廓效应:对逼真生活环境的审美偏好和应激反应的差异。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 1;13:933344. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.933344. eCollection 2022.
10
Edge-Orientation Entropy Predicts Preference for Diverse Types of Man-Made Images.边缘方向熵可预测对不同类型人造图像的偏好。
Front Neurosci. 2018 Sep 28;12:678. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00678. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Reassessing the curvature effect in tables and chairs.重新评估桌椅中的曲率效应。
Iperception. 2025 May 22;16(3):20416695251341682. doi: 10.1177/20416695251341682. eCollection 2025 May-Jun.
2
Beauty is context-dependent: Naturalness, familiarity, and semantic meaning influence the appreciation of geometric shapes.美是依赖于背景的:自然性、熟悉度和语义意义会影响对几何形状的欣赏。
Iperception. 2024 Dec 26;15(6):20416695241303004. doi: 10.1177/20416695241303004. eCollection 2024 Nov-Dec.
3
Neural dissociation between computational and perceived measures of curvature.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychometric Properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory.HEXACO人格量表的心理测量特性。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2004 Apr 1;39(2):329-58. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8.
2
Preference for Curvature: A Historical and Conceptual Framework.对曲率的偏好:一个历史与概念框架
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Jan 12;9:712. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00712. eCollection 2015.
3
Common Visual Preference for Curved Contours in Humans and Great Apes.人类和大猩猩对弯曲轮廓的共同视觉偏好。
神经对曲率的计算和感知度量的分离。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 3;14(1):26529. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76931-8.
4
Aesthetic experiences and their transformative power: a systematic review.审美体验及其变革力量:一项系统综述。
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 3;15:1328449. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1328449. eCollection 2024.
5
The Aesthetic Developmental Characteristics of Contour Features in Children and Adolescents with High- and Low- Level Visual Aesthetic Sensitivity across Grade Levels.不同年级具有高、低水平视觉审美敏感性的儿童和青少年轮廓特征的审美发展特征
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 May 15;14(5):416. doi: 10.3390/bs14050416.
6
An fMRI study of visual geometric shapes processing.一项关于视觉几何形状加工的功能磁共振成像研究。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Mar 16;17:1087488. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1087488. eCollection 2023.
7
Sensehacking the guest's multisensory hotel experience.感知黑客技术打造宾客的多感官酒店体验。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 19;13:1014818. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1014818. eCollection 2022.
8
The contour effect: Differences in the aesthetic preference and stress response to photo-realistic living environments.轮廓效应:对逼真生活环境的审美偏好和应激反应的差异。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 1;13:933344. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.933344. eCollection 2022.
9
The aesthetics of frieze patterns: Effects of symmetry, motif, and element size.饰带图案的美学:对称性、图案和元素大小的影响。
Iperception. 2022 Oct 27;13(5):20416695221131112. doi: 10.1177/20416695221131112. eCollection 2022 Sep-Oct.
10
Statistical image properties predict aesthetic ratings in abstract paintings created by neural style transfer.统计图像属性可预测通过神经风格迁移创作的抽象画的审美评级。
Front Neurosci. 2022 Oct 13;16:999720. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.999720. eCollection 2022.
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 11;10(11):e0141106. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141106. eCollection 2015.
4
Comparing Angular and Curved Shapes in Terms of Implicit Associations and Approach/Avoidance Responses.从内隐联想和趋近/回避反应方面比较角形和曲线形状。
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 13;10(10):e0140043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140043. eCollection 2015.
5
Is this a "Fettecke" or just a "greasy corner"? About the capability of laypersons to differentiate between art and non-art via object's originality.这是一个“脂肪斑”还是仅仅是一个“油腻角落”?关于外行人通过物体的原创性来区分艺术与非艺术的能力。
Iperception. 2014 Nov 28;5(7):602-10. doi: 10.1068/i0664. eCollection 2014.
6
Do observers like curvature or do they dislike angularity?观察者喜欢曲线还是不喜欢棱角?
Br J Psychol. 2016 Feb;107(1):154-78. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12132. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
7
A dual-process perspective on fluency-based aesthetics: the pleasure-interest model of aesthetic liking.双过程视角下基于流畅性的美学:审美喜欢的兴趣-愉悦模型。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2015 Nov;19(4):395-410. doi: 10.1177/1088868315574978. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
8
Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture.建筑轮廓对审美判断和趋近-回避决策的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jun 18;110 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):10446-53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1301227110. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
9
Components of aesthetic experience: aesthetic fascination, aesthetic appraisal, and aesthetic emotion.审美体验的组成部分:审美迷恋、审美评价和审美情感。
Iperception. 2012;3(1):1-17. doi: 10.1068/i0450aap. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
10
Emotional valence modulates the preference for curved objects.情绪效价调节对曲线物体的偏好。
Perception. 2011;40(6):649-55. doi: 10.1068/p6845.