Suppr超能文献

盘状红斑狼疮的分类:背景、差距与困难

Classifying discoid lupus erythematosus: background, gaps, and difficulties.

作者信息

Haber Jessica S, Merola Joseph F, Werth Victoria P

机构信息

Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VAMC (Philadelphia), Philadelphia, PA.

Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

出版信息

Int J Womens Dermatol. 2017 Feb 16;3(1 Suppl):S62-S66. doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2017.02.013. eCollection 2017 Mar.

Abstract

To inform our ongoing efforts to develop defining features to be incorporated into a novel set of classification criteria for discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE), we conducted a literature review using the Ovid MEDLINE database. A search was performed to identify studies reporting criteria used to distinguish DLE from other cutaneous lupus erythematosus subtypes. We examined which clinical, histopathologic, and serologic features have data to support their use as effective features in distinguishing DLE from other potential disease mimickers and cutaneous lupus subsets. Through our search, we were also able to identify gaps that exist in the literature which can inform future directions for research endeavors. We found that localization of lesions, characteristic features of damage, and the absence of high titer Ro/SSA antibody seem most effective in differentiating DLE from other cutaneous lupus erythematosus subtypes. Histopathologic features and class of immunoreactant deposition appear to be less helpful.

摘要

为了推进我们正在进行的工作,以确定可纳入盘状红斑狼疮(DLE)新分类标准的特征,我们使用Ovid MEDLINE数据库进行了文献综述。通过检索,我们识别出了报告用于区分DLE与其他皮肤红斑狼疮亚型标准的研究。我们研究了哪些临床、组织病理学和血清学特征有数据支持其作为将DLE与其他潜在疾病模仿者及皮肤狼疮亚组区分开来的有效特征。通过检索,我们还发现了文献中存在的空白,这些空白可为未来的研究方向提供参考。我们发现,皮损定位、损害的特征性表现以及无高滴度Ro/SSA抗体似乎在区分DLE与其他皮肤红斑狼疮亚型方面最为有效。组织病理学特征和免疫反应物沉积类型似乎帮助较小。

相似文献

1
Classifying discoid lupus erythematosus: background, gaps, and difficulties.
Int J Womens Dermatol. 2017 Feb 16;3(1 Suppl):S62-S66. doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2017.02.013. eCollection 2017 Mar.
2
Classifying discoid lupus erythematosus: background, gaps, and difficulties.
Int J Womens Dermatol. 2016 Mar 7;2(1):8-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2016.01.001. eCollection 2016 Mar.
5
Development of classification criteria for discoid lupus erythematosus: Results of a Delphi exercise.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Aug;77(2):261-267. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.02.030. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
6
Developing classification criteria for discoid lupus erythematosus: an update from the World Congress of Dermatology 2015 meeting.
Int J Womens Dermatol. 2016 Feb 28;2(2):44-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2015.12.002. eCollection 2016 Jun.
9
Lupus erythematosus tumidus is a separate subtype of cutaneous lupus erythematosus.
Br J Dermatol. 2010 Jan;162(1):64-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09401.x. Epub 2009 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
A scientometric study on research trends and characteristics of discoid lupus erythematosus.
J Dent Sci. 2025 Jan;20(1):667-671. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2024.10.003. Epub 2024 Oct 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Redefining cutaneous lupus erythematosus: a proposed international consensus approach and results of a preliminary questionnaire.
Lupus Sci Med. 2015 Mar 26;2(1):e000085. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2015-000085. eCollection 2015.
2
Immunohistochemistry of ultrastructural changes in scarring lupus erythematosus.
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2011 Jan;36(1):63-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2010.03859.x.
3
Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: issues in diagnosis and treatment.
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2009;10(6):365-81. doi: 10.2165/11310780-000000000-00000.
5
Immunoglobulin M predominance in cutaneous lupus erythematosus.
J Cutan Pathol. 2005 May;32(5):352-5. doi: 10.1111/j.0303-6987.2005.00337.x.
6
Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: diagnosis and management.
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2003;4(7):449-65. doi: 10.2165/00128071-200304070-00002.
7
The significance of the 'dust-like particles' pattern of immunofluorescence. A study of 66 cases.
Br J Dermatol. 1998 Jun;138(6):1039-42. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1998.02275.x.
9
Chronic discoid lupus erythematosus in Thailand: direct immunofluorescence study.
Int J Dermatol. 1996 Oct;35(10):711-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4362.1996.tb00643.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验