Suppr超能文献

《DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍检查表德语文本版(PCL-5):心理测量学特性和诊断效用》。

The German version of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): psychometric properties and diagnostic utility.

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, University of Münster, Fliednerstrasse 21, 48149, Münster, Germany.

Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Free University Berlin, 14195, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Nov 28;17(1):379. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1541-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist (PCL, now PCL-5) has recently been revised to reflect the new diagnostic criteria of the disorder.

METHODS

A clinical sample of trauma-exposed individuals (N = 352) was assessed with the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) and the PCL-5. Internal consistencies and test-retest reliability were computed. To investigate diagnostic accuracy, we calculated receiver operating curves. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were performed to analyze the structural validity.

RESULTS

Results showed high internal consistency (α = .95), high test-retest reliability (r = .91) and a high correlation with the total severity score of the CAPS-5, r = .77. In addition, the recommended cutoff of 33 on the PCL-5 showed high diagnostic accuracy when compared to the diagnosis established by the CAPS-5. CFAs comparing the DSM-5 model with alternative models (the three-factor solution, the dysphoria, anhedonia, externalizing behavior and hybrid model) to account for the structural validity of the PCL-5 remained inconclusive.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the findings show that the German PCL-5 is a reliable instrument with good diagnostic accuracy. However, more research evaluating the underlying factor structure is needed.

摘要

背景

创伤后应激障碍 (PTSD) 检查表 (PCL,现称 PCL-5) 最近进行了修订,以反映该障碍的新诊断标准。

方法

对一组有创伤暴露史的个体(N=352)进行了 DSM-5 临床医师管理创伤后应激障碍量表 (CAPS-5) 和 PCL-5 的评估。计算了内部一致性和重测信度。为了研究诊断准确性,我们计算了受试者工作特征曲线。进行验证性因素分析 (CFA) 以分析结构效度。

结果

结果显示,该量表具有较高的内部一致性 (α=.95)、较高的重测信度 (r=.91),与 CAPS-5 的总严重程度评分高度相关,r=.77。此外,与 CAPS-5 确定的诊断相比,PCL-5 的 33 分推荐截断值显示出较高的诊断准确性。CFAs 比较了 DSM-5 模型与替代模型(三因素解决方案、抑郁、快感缺失、外化行为和混合模型),以说明 PCL-5 的结构效度,结果仍不确定。

结论

总体而言,研究结果表明,德文版 PCL-5 是一种具有良好诊断准确性的可靠工具。然而,需要更多评估其潜在因素结构的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0a6/5704375/24144707f62b/12888_2017_1541_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验