Winkler Petr, Krupchanka Dzmitry, Roberts Tessa, Kondratova Lucie, Machů Vendula, Höschl Cyril, Sartorius Norman, Van Voren Robert, Aizberg Oleg, Bitter Istvan, Cerga-Pashoja Arlinda, Deljkovic Azra, Fanaj Naim, Germanavicius Arunas, Hinkov Hristo, Hovsepyan Aram, Ismayilov Fuad N, Ivezic Sladana Strkalj, Jarema Marek, Jordanova Vesna, Kukić Selma, Makhashvili Nino, Šarotar Brigita Novak, Plevachuk Oksana, Smirnova Daria, Voinescu Bogdan Ioan, Vrublevska Jelena, Thornicroft Graham
Department of Social Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic; Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Department of Social Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic; Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Institute of Global Health, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 Aug;4(8):634-642. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30135-9. Epub 2017 May 8.
Just over 25 years have passed since the major sociopolitical changes in central and eastern Europe; our aim was to map and analyse the development of mental health-care practice for people with severe mental illnesses in this region since then. A scoping review was complemented by an expert survey in 24 countries. Mental health-care practice in the region differs greatly across as well as within individual countries. National policies often exist but reforms remain mostly in the realm of aspiration. Services are predominantly based in psychiatric hospitals. Decision making on resource allocation is not transparent, and full economic evaluations of complex interventions and rigorous epidemiological studies are lacking. Stigma seems to be higher than in other European countries, but consideration of human rights and user involvement are increasing. The region has seen respectable development, which happened because of grassroots initiatives supported by international organisations, rather than by systematic implementation of government policies.
自中东欧发生重大社会政治变革以来,25年多的时间已经过去;我们的目标是描绘并分析该地区自那时起针对严重精神疾病患者的精神卫生保健实践的发展情况。一项范围界定综述辅以对24个国家的专家调查。该地区的精神卫生保健实践在各个国家之间以及单个国家内部都存在很大差异。国家政策通常存在,但改革大多仍停留在设想层面。服务主要集中在精神病医院。资源分配的决策不透明,缺乏对复杂干预措施的全面经济评估和严谨的流行病学研究。污名化现象似乎比其他欧洲国家更为严重,但对人权的考量和用户参与度正在提高。该地区取得了可观的发展,这是由于国际组织支持的基层倡议,而非政府政策的系统实施。