• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支气管扩张症健康问卷的制定与验证。

The development and validation of the Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire.

机构信息

Division of Asthma, Allergy and Lung Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.

School of Public Health and Psychosocial Studies and School of Rehabilitation and Occupation Studies, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Eur Respir J. 2017 May 11;49(5). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01532-2016. Print 2017 May.

DOI:10.1183/13993003.01532-2016
PMID:28495688
Abstract

Health-related quality of life or health status is significantly impaired in bronchiectasis. There is a paucity of brief, simple-to-use, disease-specific health status measures. The aim of this study was to develop and validate the Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire (BHQ), a new health status measure that is brief and generates a single overall score.Patients with bronchiectasis were recruited from two outpatient clinics, during a clinically stable stage. The development of the questionnaire followed three phases: item generation and item reduction using Rasch analysis, validation, and repeatability testing. The BHQ was translated into 11 languages using standardised methodology.206 patients with bronchiectasis completed a preliminary 65-item questionnaire. 55 items were removed due to redundancy or poor fit to the Rasch model. The final version of the BHQ consisted of 10 items. Internal consistency was good (Cronbach's α=0.85). Convergent validity of the BHQ with the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire was high (r= -0.82; p<0.001) and moderate with lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 s % predicted r= -0.27; p=0.001). There was a significant association between BHQ scores and number of exacerbations of bronchiectasis in the last 12 months (p<0.001), hospital admissions (p=0.001) and computed tomography scan bronchiectasis pulmonary lobe counts (p<0.001). BHQ scores were significantly worse in patients with sputum bacterial colonisation no colonisation (p=0.048). The BHQ was highly repeatable after 2 weeks (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.89).The BHQ is a brief, valid and repeatable, self-completed health status questionnaire for bronchiectasis that generates a single total score. It can be used in the clinic to assess bronchiectasis from the patient's perspective.

摘要

健康相关的生活质量或健康状况在支气管扩张症中显著受损。目前缺乏简短、易于使用、针对特定疾病的健康状况衡量标准。本研究旨在开发和验证支气管扩张症健康问卷(BHQ),这是一种新的健康状况衡量标准,它简洁并能生成单一的总体评分。

支气管扩张症患者从两个门诊诊所招募,在临床稳定阶段。问卷的开发分为三个阶段:使用 RASCH 分析生成项目和项目减少、验证和可重复性测试。BHQ 已使用标准化方法翻译成 11 种语言。206 例支气管扩张症患者完成了初步的 65 项问卷。由于冗余或与 RASCH 模型拟合不佳,有 55 个项目被删除。BHQ 的最终版本由 10 个项目组成。内部一致性良好(Cronbach's α=0.85)。BHQ 与圣乔治呼吸问卷的收敛效度较高(r= -0.82;p<0.001),与肺功能(用力呼气量 1 秒%预测值 r= -0.27;p=0.001)的相关性中等。BHQ 评分与支气管扩张症在过去 12 个月内的恶化次数(p<0.001)、住院次数(p=0.001)和 CT 扫描支气管扩张症肺叶计数(p<0.001)显著相关。BHQ 评分在痰细菌定植患者中明显较差-无定植(p=0.048)。BHQ 在 2 周后高度可重复(组内相关系数 0.89)。

BHQ 是一种简短、有效和可重复的、自我完成的支气管扩张症健康状况问卷,可生成单一的总评分。它可以在临床上从患者的角度评估支气管扩张症。

相似文献

1
The development and validation of the Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire.支气管扩张症健康问卷的制定与验证。
Eur Respir J. 2017 May 11;49(5). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01532-2016. Print 2017 May.
2
The development and validation of the King's Sarcoidosis Questionnaire for the assessment of health status.《国王结节病问卷的开发与验证:用于评估健康状况》。
Thorax. 2013 Jan;68(1):57-65. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-201962. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
3
Translation and linguistic validation of the Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire (BHQ) into Danish.支气管扩张症健康问卷(BHQ)翻译成丹麦语及语言验证。
Dan Med J. 2020 Mar;67(3).
4
The development and validation of the King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease (K-BILD) health status questionnaire.《国王简短间质性肺病(K-BILD)健康状况问卷的制定与验证》。
Thorax. 2012 Sep;67(9):804-10. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-201581. Epub 2012 May 3.
5
[Internal consistency and validity of the Spanish version of the St. George's respiratory questionnaire for use in patients with clinically stable bronchiectasis].[圣乔治呼吸问卷西班牙语版在临床稳定支气管扩张症患者中的内部一致性和效度]
Arch Bronconeumol. 2005 Mar;41(3):110-7. doi: 10.1016/s1579-2129(06)60410-2.
6
A study of the psychometric properties of the Brazilian...Portuguese version of Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire.支气管扩张症健康问卷巴西葡萄牙语版的心理测量特性研究。
Pulmonology. 2023 Jan-Feb;29(1):42-49. doi: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2020.10.012. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
7
Quality of Life Questionnaire-Bronchiectasis: final psychometric analyses and determination of minimal important difference scores.生活质量问卷-支气管扩张症:最终心理测量学分析和最小重要差异评分的确定。
Thorax. 2015 Jan;70(1):12-20. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-205918. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
8
Validation of the Korean Version of the Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire.《支气管扩张症健康问卷》韩文版的验证
Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2020 Jul;83(3):228-233. doi: 10.4046/trd.2020.0025. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
9
Validity and Reliability of the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire in Elderly Individuals with Mild to Moderate Non-Cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis.慢性呼吸系统疾病问卷在轻度至中度非囊性纤维化支气管扩张症老年患者中的有效性和可靠性
Respiration. 2015;90(2):89-96. doi: 10.1159/000430992. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
10
Validation of the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) as an Outcome Measure in Bronchiectasis.支气管扩张症中 COPD 评估测试(CAT)作为结局指标的验证。
Chest. 2020 Apr;157(4):815-823. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.10.030. Epub 2019 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Mucus plugging, disease severity and sputum myeloperoxidase concentration in bronchiectasis.支气管扩张症中的黏液阻塞、疾病严重程度及痰液髓过氧化物酶浓度
ERJ Open Res. 2025 May 19;11(3). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00279-2024. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Unravelling the role of heart rate recovery in bronchiectasis: do we need to establish a cutoff value?揭示心率恢复在支气管扩张症中的作用:我们是否需要确定一个临界值?
ERJ Open Res. 2025 Mar 3;11(2). doi: 10.1183/23120541.01119-2024. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
The prevalence and implications of depression and anxiety in patients with bronchiectasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
支气管扩张症患者中抑郁和焦虑的患病率及其影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
ERJ Open Res. 2024 Dec 9;10(6). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00248-2024. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
Patient-managed interventions for adults with bronchiectasis: evidence, challenges and prospects.患者管理干预措施在支气管扩张症成人患者中的应用:证据、挑战与前景。
Eur Respir Rev. 2024 Oct 30;33(174). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0087-2024. Print 2024 Oct.
5
[Highlights 57th SEPAR Congress].[第57届西班牙呼吸学会大会亮点]
Open Respir Arch. 2024 Sep 5;6(4):100360. doi: 10.1016/j.opresp.2024.100360. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.
6
Clinical Impacts of Isolation in Patients with Bronchiectasis: Findings from KMBARC Registry.支气管扩张症患者隔离的临床影响:来自KMBARC注册研究的结果
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 24;13(17):5011. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175011.
7
Silence is golden, but my measures still see-why cheaper-but-noisier outcome measures in large simple trials can be more cost-effective than gold standards.沉默是金,但我的措施仍有道理——大型简单试验中更廉价但更嘈杂的结果测量指标可能比金标准更具成本效益。
Trials. 2024 Aug 12;25(1):532. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08374-5.
8
Development of a core outcome set for physiotherapy trials in adults with bronchiectasis (the COS-PHyBE study): A Delphi study and consensus meeting.成人支气管扩张症物理治疗试验核心结局集的制定(COS-PHyBE研究):一项德尔菲研究与共识会议
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 5;10(14):e34101. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34101. eCollection 2024 Jul 30.
9
COPD Assessment Test and risk of readmission in patients with bronchiectasis: a prospective cohort study.慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试与支气管扩张症患者再入院风险:一项前瞻性队列研究
ERJ Open Res. 2024 Mar 18;10(2). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00867-2023. eCollection 2024 Mar.
10
Bronchiectasis in renal transplant patients: a cross-sectional study.肾移植患者支气管扩张症:一项横断面研究。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Feb 13;29(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01701-1.