Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2017 Dec;42(13):2623-2632. doi: 10.1038/npp.2017.97. Epub 2017 May 12.
Depressed patients show abnormalities in brain connectivity at rest, including hyperconnectivity within the default mode network (DMN). However, there is well-known heterogeneity in the clinical presentation of depression that is overlooked when averaging connectivity data. We used data-driven parsing of neural connectivity to reveal subgroups among 80 depressed patients completing resting state fMRI. Directed functional connectivity paths (eg, region A influences region B) within a depression-relevant network were characterized using Group Iterative Multiple Model Estimation, a method shown to accurately recover the direction and presence of connectivity paths in individual participants. Individuals were clustered using community detection on neural connectivity estimates. Subgroups were compared on network features and on clinical and biological/demographic characteristics that influence depression prognosis. Two subgroups emerged. Subgroup A, containing 71% of the patients, showed a typical pattern of connectivity across DMN nodes, as previously reported in depressed patients on average. Subgroup B exhibited an atypical connectivity profile lacking DMN connectivity, with increased dorsal anterior cingulate-driven connectivity paths. Subgroup B members had an over-representation of females (87% of Subgroup B vs 65% of Subgroup A; χ=3.89, p=0.049), comorbid anxiety diagnoses (42.9% of Subgroup B vs 17.5% of Subgroup A; χ=5.34, p=.02), and highly recurrent depression (63.2% of Subgroup B vs 31.8% of Subgroup A; χ=5.38, p=.02). Neural connectivity-based categorization revealed an atypical pattern of connectivity in a depressed patient subset that would be overlooked in group comparisons of depressed and healthy participants, and tracks with clinically relevant phenotypes including anxious depression and episodic recurrence. Data-driven parsing suggests heterogeneous substrates of depression; ideally, future work building on these findings will inform personalized treatment.
抑郁患者在休息时表现出大脑连接异常,包括默认模式网络 (DMN) 内的超连接。然而,抑郁的临床表现存在众所周知的异质性,在对连接数据进行平均处理时会忽略这种异质性。我们使用神经连接的数据分析来揭示 80 名完成静息态 fMRI 的抑郁患者中的亚组。使用群组迭代多模型估计 (Group Iterative Multiple Model Estimation) 来描述与抑郁相关的网络内的定向功能连接路径(例如,区域 A 影响区域 B),这是一种在个体参与者中准确恢复连接路径方向和存在的方法。使用基于神经网络连接估计的社区检测对个体进行聚类。在网络特征以及影响抑郁预后的临床和生物学/人口统计学特征上比较亚组。出现了两个亚组。包含 71%患者的亚组 A 表现出 DMN 节点之间的典型连接模式,这与平均抑郁患者之前的报道一致。亚组 B 表现出异常的连接模式,缺乏 DMN 连接,前扣带皮质背侧驱动的连接路径增加。亚组 B 成员中女性比例过高(亚组 B 中 87%,亚组 A 中 65%;χ=3.89,p=0.049),合并焦虑诊断(亚组 B 中 42.9%,亚组 A 中 17.5%;χ=5.34,p=0.02),以及高度反复发作的抑郁(亚组 B 中 63.2%,亚组 A 中 31.8%;χ=5.38,p=0.02)。基于神经连接的分类揭示了抑郁患者亚组中一种异常的连接模式,如果在抑郁患者和健康参与者的组间比较中,这种模式会被忽略,并与包括焦虑性抑郁和发作性复发在内的临床相关表型相关。数据分析提示抑郁的基础存在异质性;理想情况下,未来基于这些发现的工作将为个性化治疗提供信息。