• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Exploring Patient Engagement: A Qualitative Analysis of Low-Income Urban Participants in Asthma Research.探索患者参与:对哮喘研究中低收入城市参与者的定性分析。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Nov-Dec;5(6):1625-1631.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.03.022. Epub 2017 May 10.
2
Filling the patient-provider knowledge gap: a patient advocate to address asthma care and self-management barriers.填补患者与医疗服务提供者之间的知识差距:一位患者倡导者应对哮喘护理和自我管理障碍。
J Asthma. 2019 Oct;56(10):1027-1036. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2018.1520864. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
3
Feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of patient advocates for improving asthma outcomes in adults.患者倡导者对改善成人哮喘结局的可行性、可接受性及初步有效性
J Asthma. 2013 Oct;50(8):850-60. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2013.812655. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
4
A patient advocate to facilitate access and improve communication, care, and outcomes in adults with moderate or severe asthma: Rationale, design, and methods of a randomized controlled trial.一名患者倡导者以促进中度或重度哮喘成人患者的就医机会并改善沟通、护理及治疗结果:一项随机对照试验的基本原理、设计与方法
Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 May;56:34-45. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
5
Interventions to increase patient and family involvement in escalation of care for acute life-threatening illness in community health and hospital settings.增加患者和家属参与社区卫生和医院环境中急性危及生命疾病治疗升级的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 8;12(12):CD012829. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012829.pub2.
6
Adult patient access to electronic health records.成年患者获取电子健康记录。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 26;2(2):CD012707. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012707.pub2.
7
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
8
Clearing clinical barriers: enhancing social support using a patient navigator for asthma care.消除临床障碍:通过患者导航员加强哮喘护理的社会支持。
J Asthma. 2010 Oct;47(8):913-9. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2010.506681.
9
Patient Advocates for Low-Income Adults with Moderate to Severe Asthma: A Randomized Clinical Trial.患者倡导组织为中重度哮喘低收入成年人提供服务:一项随机临床试验。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Nov-Dec;8(10):3466-3473.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.06.058. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
10
Assessing Patient and Provider Perceptions of Factors Associated with Patient Engagement in Asthma Care.评估患者和提供者对与哮喘护理中患者参与相关的因素的看法。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 May;14(5):659-666. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201608-602OC.

引用本文的文献

1
Life Course of Asthma.哮喘的生命历程。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2023;1426:43-76. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-32259-4_3.
2
Health Disparities: Interventions for Pulmonary Disease - A Narrative Review.健康差异:肺部疾病干预措施 - 叙述性评论。
Chest. 2023 Jul;164(1):179-189. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.02.033. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
3
Factors that influence older patients' participation in clinical communication within developed country hospitals and GP clinics: A systematic review of current literature.影响发达国家医院和全科医生诊所中老年患者参与临床沟通的因素:当前文献的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 27;17(6):e0269840. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269840. eCollection 2022.
4
Patient Advocates for Low-Income Adults with Moderate to Severe Asthma: A Randomized Clinical Trial.患者倡导组织为中重度哮喘低收入成年人提供服务:一项随机临床试验。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Nov-Dec;8(10):3466-3473.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.06.058. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
5
Considering the Control Group: The Influence of Follow-Up Assessments on Asthma Symptoms.考虑对照组:随访评估对哮喘症状的影响。
Acad Pediatr. 2020 Jan-Feb;20(1):63-72. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2019.07.009. Epub 2019 Jul 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review.患者门户网站与患者参与度:科学现状综述
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 23;17(6):e148. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4255.
2
Assessing treatment outcomes using a single question: the net promoter score.使用单一问题评估治疗结果:净推荐值。
Bone Joint J. 2014 May;96-B(5):622-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B5.32434.
3
Research participation effects: a skeleton in the methodological cupboard.研究参与效应:方法论衣橱里的骷髅。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Aug;67(8):845-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.002. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
4
A classification model of patient engagement methods and assessment of their feasibility in real-world settings.患者参与方法的分类模型及其在现实环境中的可行性评估。
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 May;95(2):281-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.01.016. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
5
Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects.系统综述霍桑效应:需要新的概念来研究研究参与效应。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Mar;67(3):267-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.08.015. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
6
Feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of patient advocates for improving asthma outcomes in adults.患者倡导者对改善成人哮喘结局的可行性、可接受性及初步有效性
J Asthma. 2013 Oct;50(8):850-60. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2013.812655. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
7
What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs.关于患者激活的证据表明:更好的健康结果和护理体验;关于成本的数据较少。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):207-14. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1061.
8
Interventions to improve outcomes for minority adults with asthma: a systematic review.改善少数族裔成年哮喘患者结局的干预措施:系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Aug;27(8):1001-15. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2058-9.
9
An analysis of contextual information relevant to medical care unexpectedly volunteered to researchers by asthma patients.哮喘患者意外地主动向研究人员提供了与医疗护理相关的背景信息分析。
J Asthma. 2012 Sep;49(7):731-7. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2012.699988. Epub 2012 Jul 13.
10
Trends in asthma prevalence, health care use, and mortality in the United States, 2001-2010.2001 - 2010年美国哮喘患病率、医疗保健利用情况及死亡率的趋势
NCHS Data Brief. 2012 May(94):1-8.

探索患者参与:对哮喘研究中低收入城市参与者的定性分析。

Exploring Patient Engagement: A Qualitative Analysis of Low-Income Urban Participants in Asthma Research.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.

Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Nov-Dec;5(6):1625-1631.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.03.022. Epub 2017 May 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaip.2017.03.022
PMID:28499772
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5681420/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Uncontrolled asthma is a common highly morbid condition with worse outcomes in low-income and minority patients in part due to barriers accessing and engaging with health care. We developed a patient advocate to educate about and assist with navigating access to care and provider-patient communication. Participants completed an End of Study Questionnaire (ESQ) that was analyzed to assess experience and engagement with the protocol.

OBJECTIVE

This study uses qualitative analysis to evaluate participant experience with the patient advocate and control group interventions.

METHODS

The ESQ aimed to prompt an open-ended discussion of study experience. Questions were developed from patient focus groups about the patient advocate intervention (PAI), and were revised based on early responses. The questionnaire was administered after 12 months of study participation: 6 months of control or PAI, followed by 6 months of follow-up. Answers were evaluated using qualitative coding and a grounded theory analytical approach.

RESULTS

A total of 102 low-income and minority adults with moderate or severe asthma who had completed the study protocol at the time of publication (approximately one-third of total participants) found PAI and control group activities acceptable. Four themes emerged from both groups: (1) appreciation of interpersonal and educational interaction, (2) perception of improved health care adherence, (3) preparedness for physician appointments, (4) improved patient-provider communication. Attention from study personnel and review of asthma-related information was unanimously well received and empowered patients' active health care participation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient engagement and empowerment were elicited by perceived education and personal attention. This study suggests a low-resource, feasible method to improve patient engagement.

摘要

背景

未控制的哮喘是一种常见的高发病率疾病,低收入和少数族裔患者的预后更差,部分原因是他们在获得和参与医疗保健方面存在障碍。我们开发了一名患者代言人,负责教育患者并协助他们获得医疗保健和医患沟通。参与者完成了一份研究结束问卷(ESQ),该问卷经过分析,以评估他们对方案的体验和参与情况。

目的

本研究使用定性分析来评估参与者对患者代言人及其对照组干预措施的体验。

方法

ESQ 的目的是为了引发对研究体验的开放式讨论。问题是根据患者对患者代言人干预(PAI)的焦点小组讨论制定的,并根据早期的反馈进行了修订。该问卷在研究参与 12 个月后进行了管理:对照组或 PAI 6 个月,然后是 6 个月的随访。使用定性编码和扎根理论分析方法对答案进行评估。

结果

共有 102 名低收入和少数族裔的中重度哮喘患者在发表时已完成研究方案(约占总参与者的三分之一),他们发现 PAI 和对照组活动是可以接受的。两组都出现了四个主题:(1)对人际和教育互动的欣赏,(2)对改善医疗保健依从性的看法,(3)为医生预约做好准备,(4)改善医患沟通。研究人员的关注和对哮喘相关信息的审查受到一致好评,并使患者积极参与医疗保健。

结论

患者的参与和赋权是通过感知教育和个人关注来实现的。本研究提出了一种低资源、可行的方法来提高患者的参与度。