Chen Tao, Yu Dahai, Cornelius Victoria, Qin Rui, Cai Yamei, Jiang Zhixin, Zhao Zhanzheng
Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China; Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.
Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China; Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele ST5 5BG, UK.
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Aug 1;240:403-408. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 May 5.
Studies have reported that pharmacologic interventions with candesartan or ramipril could reduce the risk of hypertension among prehypertensive subjects free of clinical cardiovascular disease (CVD), however, the cost-effectiveness and long-term cardiovascular risk of drug treatment among these population is unclear.
A Markov state-transition model was developed to simulate a hypothetical cohort of Chinese adults with high-range prehypertension (130-139/85-89mmHg) but without CVD. Data on the incidence of CVD and hypertension was obtained from corresponding risk equations. Utility and disease-related costs were obtained from published literatures. Robustness and uncertainty was evaluated using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.
Compared with placebo, drug treatment resulted in delaying the development of hypertension by nearly 12years and reducing the absolute incidence of hypertension by 32.01% over lifetime. The cumulative incidence of coronary heart disease, stroke and heart failure were reduced and survival was improved from 28.46 to 28.80years. The average incremental cost effectiveness ratio for drug treatment was $12,994 per quality-adjusted life-year and the value was mostly sensitive to the effect size of treatment and age starting treatment. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of >3×China gross domestic product per capita in 2014, there was a 30.48% chance that drug treatment would remain cost-effective and a low chance of being cost-effective if relative risk of treatment on hypertension was larger than 0.64.
Drug treatment for prehypertension may help stem the current epidemic of hypertension among Chinese adults free of CVD, which may in turn reduce CVD complications and potentially be cost effective.
研究报告称,使用坎地沙坦或雷米普利进行药物干预可降低无临床心血管疾病(CVD)的高血压前期患者患高血压的风险,然而,这些人群中药物治疗的成本效益和长期心血管风险尚不清楚。
建立了一个马尔可夫状态转换模型,以模拟一组假设的中国成年人队列,这些成年人患有高范围高血压前期(130-139/85-89mmHg)但无CVD。从相应的风险方程中获取CVD和高血压发病率的数据。效用和疾病相关成本来自已发表的文献。使用确定性和概率敏感性分析评估稳健性和不确定性。
与安慰剂相比,药物治疗使高血压的发展延迟了近12年,并使一生中高血压的绝对发病率降低了32.01%。冠心病、中风和心力衰竭的累积发病率降低,生存率从28.46岁提高到28.80岁。药物治疗的平均增量成本效益比为每质量调整生命年12,994美元,该值对治疗效果大小和开始治疗的年龄最为敏感。在支付意愿阈值高于2014年中国人均国内生产总值3倍的情况下,药物治疗仍具有成本效益的概率为30.48%,如果高血压治疗的相对风险大于0.64,则具有成本效益的可能性较低。
对高血压前期进行药物治疗可能有助于遏制中国无CVD成年人中当前的高血压流行,这反过来可能减少CVD并发症,并可能具有成本效益。