• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 10 年心血管疾病风险的 1 期高血压药物治疗起始的成本效益:一项马尔可夫模型研究。

Cost-Effectiveness of Initiating Pharmacological Treatment in Stage One Hypertension Based on 10-Year Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Markov Modeling Study.

机构信息

From the National Guideline Centre (NGC), Regent's Park, London (M.C., R.B.).

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital Campus (C.N.F.).

出版信息

Hypertension. 2021 Feb;77(2):682-691. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.14913. Epub 2020 Dec 21.

DOI:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.14913
PMID:33342242
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7803450/
Abstract

Antihypertensive drug treatment is cost-effective for adults at high risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, the cost-effectiveness in people with stage 1 hypertension (140-159 mm Hg systolic blood pressure) at lower CVD risk remains unclear. The objective was to establish the 10-year CVD risk threshold where initiating antihypertensive drug treatment for primary prevention in adults, with stage 1 hypertension, becomes cost-effective. A lifetime horizon Markov model compared antihypertensive drug versus no treatment, using a UK National Health Service perspective. Analyses were conducted for groups ranging between 5% and 20% 10-year CVD risk. Health states included no CVD event, CVD and non-CVD death, and 6 nonfatal CVD morbidities. Interventions were compared using cost-per-quality-adjusted life-years. The base-case age was 60, with analyses repeated between ages 40 and 75. The model was run separately for men and women, and threshold CVD risk assessed against the minimum plausible risk for each group. Treatment was cost-effective at 10% CVD risk for both sexes (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio £10 017/quality-adjusted life-year [$14 542] men, £8635/QALY [$12 536] women) in the base-case. The result was robust in probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses but was sensitive to treatment effects. Treatment was cost-effective for men regardless of age and women aged >60. Initiating treatment in stage 1 hypertension for people aged 60 is cost-effective regardless of 10-year CVD risk. For other age groups, it is also cost-effective to treat regardless of risk, except in younger women.

摘要

降压药物治疗对有发生心血管疾病(CVD)风险的成年人是具有成本效益的。然而,在 CVD 风险较低的 1 期高血压(收缩压 140-159mmHg)人群中,其成本效益尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定启动降压药物治疗的 10 年 CVD 风险阈值,使患有 1 期高血压的成年人进行一级预防具有成本效益。使用英国国家医疗服务体系的观点,通过终生马尔可夫模型比较了降压药物治疗与不治疗的效果。分析的人群范围为 10 年 CVD 风险在 5%至 20%之间的个体。健康状态包括无 CVD 事件、CVD 和非 CVD 死亡以及 6 种非致命性 CVD 疾病。通过每质量调整生命年成本来比较干预措施。基础病例年龄为 60 岁,在 40 至 75 岁之间重复进行分析。该模型分别针对男性和女性进行了运行,根据每组的最低可能风险评估了阈值 CVD 风险。对于两性,在 10%的 CVD 风险下,治疗具有成本效益(增量成本效果比为男性每质量调整生命年 10017 英镑[14542 美元],女性每质量调整生命年 8635 英镑[12536 美元])。在概率和确定性敏感性分析中,结果是稳健的,但对治疗效果敏感。无论年龄大小,男性都具有成本效益,而年龄大于 60 岁的女性也具有成本效益。对于 60 岁的人,无论 10 年 CVD 风险如何,启动 1 期高血压的治疗都是具有成本效益的。对于其他年龄组,无论风险如何,治疗都是具有成本效益的,但年轻女性除外。

相似文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of Initiating Pharmacological Treatment in Stage One Hypertension Based on 10-Year Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Markov Modeling Study.基于 10 年心血管疾病风险的 1 期高血压药物治疗起始的成本效益:一项马尔可夫模型研究。
Hypertension. 2021 Feb;77(2):682-691. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.14913. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
2
Economic evaluation of primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in mild hypertension: a scenario analysis for the Netherlands.轻度高血压患者心血管疾病一级预防的经济学评估:荷兰的情景分析
Clin Ther. 2014 Mar 1;36(3):368-84.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.01.008. Epub 2014 Feb 15.
3
Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Conservative or Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment Guidelines in Adults Aged 35-74 Years: The Cardiovascular Disease Policy Model.35至74岁成年人中保守或强化血压治疗指南的比较成本效益:心血管疾病政策模型
Hypertension. 2016 Jul;68(1):88-96. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.06814. Epub 2016 May 15.
4
Cost-effectiveness of self-management of blood pressure in hypertensive patients over 70 years with suboptimal control and established cardiovascular disease or additional cardiovascular risk diseases (TASMIN-SR).高血压患者自我血压管理的成本效益:血压控制不理想且患有心血管疾病或其他心血管风险疾病的 70 岁以上患者(TASMIN-SR)。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Jun;23(9):902-12. doi: 10.1177/2047487315618784. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
5
Cost-Effectiveness of Salt Substitution and Antihypertensive Drug Treatment in Chinese Prehypertensive Adults.中国高血压前期成年人用盐替代和抗高血压药物治疗的成本效果分析。
Hypertension. 2024 Dec;81(12):2529-2539. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.23412. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
6
Results of a Markov model analysis to assess the cost-effectiveness of a single tablet of fixed-dose amlodipine and atorvastatin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in Korea.评估固定剂量氨氯地平和阿托伐他汀单片用于韩国心血管疾病一级预防的成本效益的马尔可夫模型分析结果。
Clin Ther. 2009 Oct;31(10):2189-203; discussion 2150-1. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.10.015.
7
The Cost-Effectiveness of Low-Cost Essential Antihypertensive Medicines for Hypertension Control in China: A Modelling Study.中国低成本基本降压药物控制高血压的成本效益:一项建模研究
PLoS Med. 2015 Aug 4;12(8):e1001860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001860. eCollection 2015 Aug.
8
Telemonitoring and self-management in the control of hypertension (TASMINH2): a cost-effectiveness analysis.高血压控制中的远程监测与自我管理(TASMINH2):一项成本效益分析。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014 Dec;21(12):1517-30. doi: 10.1177/2047487313501886. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
9
Cost-effectiveness of hypertension therapy according to 2014 guidelines.根据2014年指南的高血压治疗成本效益
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 29;372(5):447-55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1406751.
10
Applicability and cost-effectiveness of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) in the Chinese population: A cost-effectiveness modeling study.在中国人群中开展收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)的适用性和成本效益:一项成本效益建模研究。
PLoS Med. 2021 Mar 4;18(3):e1003515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003515. eCollection 2021 Mar.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of segmental adrenal venous sampling with radiofrequency ablation for primary aldosteronism in Japan.日本原发性醛固酮增多症射频消融术分段肾上腺静脉采血的成本效益分析。
Jpn J Radiol. 2025 Feb;43(2):290-300. doi: 10.1007/s11604-024-01665-6. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
2
Cost-effectiveness of group medical visits and microfinance interventions versus usual care to manage hypertension in Kenya: a secondary modelling analysis of data from the Bridging Income Generation with Group Integrated Care (BIGPIC) trial.肯尼亚群组医疗访视和小额信贷干预与常规护理治疗高血压的成本效益比较:BIGPIC 试验数据的二次建模分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2024 Aug;12(8):e1331-e1342. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00188-8.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Investigation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure in Young People: Too Much Medicine or Appropriate Risk Reduction?年轻人高血压的调查与治疗:过度用药还是适当降低风险?
Hypertension. 2020 Jan;75(1):16-22. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.13820. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
2
Hypertension in adults: summary of updated NICE guidance.成人高血压:英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)最新指南总结
BMJ. 2019 Oct 21;367:l5310. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5310.
3
The 2018 ESC/ESH hypertension guideline and the 2019 NICE hypertension guideline, how and why they differ.
Investigation and management of young-onset hypertension: British and Irish hypertension society position statement.
青少年高血压的调查与管理:英国和爱尔兰高血压学会立场声明。
J Hum Hypertens. 2024 Jul;38(7):544-554. doi: 10.1038/s41371-024-00922-5. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
4
Scaling hypertension treatment in 24 low-income and middle-income countries: economic evaluation of treatment decisions at three blood pressure cut-points.在 24 个低收入和中等收入国家扩大高血压治疗范围:三种血压切点治疗决策的经济评价。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 15;14(4):e071036. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071036.
5
Cost-effectiveness of drug treatment for young and middle-aged stage 1 hypertensive patients with high risk.药物治疗高危中青年 1 期高血压患者的成本效益分析。
J Glob Health. 2023 Nov 24;13:04147. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04147.
6
Estimating Costs Associated with Disease Model States Using Generalized Linear Models: A Tutorial.使用广义线性模型估计疾病模型状态相关成本:教程。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Mar;42(3):261-273. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01319-x. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
7
Comparison between the world health organization (WHO) and international society of hypertension (ISH) guidelines for hypertension.世界卫生组织 (WHO) 与国际高血压学会 (ISH) 高血压指南比较。
Ann Med. 2022 Dec;54(1):837-845. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2044510.
8
Telemonitoring and Case Management for Hypertensive and Remote-Dwelling Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease-The Telemonitoring for Improved Kidney Outcomes Study (TIKO): A Clinical Research Protocol.高血压合并慢性肾病的远程居住患者的远程监测与病例管理——改善肾脏结局的远程监测研究(TIKO):一项临床研究方案
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2022 Feb 13;9:20543581221077500. doi: 10.1177/20543581221077500. eCollection 2022.
9
Identification of Health Expenditures Determinants: A Model to Manage the Economic Burden of Cardiovascular Disease.确定卫生支出决定因素:管理心血管疾病经济负担的模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 27;18(9):4652. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094652.
2018年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲高血压学会高血压指南与2019年英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所高血压指南,它们的差异及原因。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Nov 1;40(42):3456-3458. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz681.
4
Midlife Hypertension and Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.中年高血压与阿尔茨海默病:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;71(1):307-316. doi: 10.3233/JAD-190474.
5
Eligibility and subsequent burden of cardiovascular disease of four strategies for blood pressure-lowering treatment: a retrospective cohort study.降压治疗四种策略的心血管疾病发病风险和后续负担:一项回顾性队列研究。
Lancet. 2019 Aug 24;394(10199):663-671. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31359-5. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
6
Prediction of individualized lifetime benefit from cholesterol lowering, blood pressure lowering, antithrombotic therapy, and smoking cessation in apparently healthy people.预测胆固醇降低、血压降低、抗血栓治疗和戒烟对明显健康人群的个体化终生获益。
Eur Heart J. 2020 Mar 14;41(11):1190-1199. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz239.
7
Effect of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control on Probable Dementia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.强化与标准血压控制对可能发生的痴呆的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Feb 12;321(6):553-561. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.21442.
8
Benefits and Harms of Antihypertensive Treatment in Low-Risk Patients With Mild Hypertension.轻度高血压低危患者降压治疗的获益与危害。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Dec 1;178(12):1626-1634. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4684.
9
Effects of Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment on Acute Kidney Injury Events in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT).强化血压治疗对收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)中急性肾损伤事件的影响。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Mar;71(3):352-361. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.08.021. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
10
Association of Blood Pressure Lowering With Mortality and Cardiovascular Disease Across Blood Pressure Levels: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.降压治疗与血压水平相关的死亡率和心血管疾病的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jan 1;178(1):28-36. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.6015.