From the National Guideline Centre (NGC), Regent's Park, London (M.C., R.B.).
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital Campus (C.N.F.).
Hypertension. 2021 Feb;77(2):682-691. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.14913. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
Antihypertensive drug treatment is cost-effective for adults at high risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, the cost-effectiveness in people with stage 1 hypertension (140-159 mm Hg systolic blood pressure) at lower CVD risk remains unclear. The objective was to establish the 10-year CVD risk threshold where initiating antihypertensive drug treatment for primary prevention in adults, with stage 1 hypertension, becomes cost-effective. A lifetime horizon Markov model compared antihypertensive drug versus no treatment, using a UK National Health Service perspective. Analyses were conducted for groups ranging between 5% and 20% 10-year CVD risk. Health states included no CVD event, CVD and non-CVD death, and 6 nonfatal CVD morbidities. Interventions were compared using cost-per-quality-adjusted life-years. The base-case age was 60, with analyses repeated between ages 40 and 75. The model was run separately for men and women, and threshold CVD risk assessed against the minimum plausible risk for each group. Treatment was cost-effective at 10% CVD risk for both sexes (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio £10 017/quality-adjusted life-year [$14 542] men, £8635/QALY [$12 536] women) in the base-case. The result was robust in probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses but was sensitive to treatment effects. Treatment was cost-effective for men regardless of age and women aged >60. Initiating treatment in stage 1 hypertension for people aged 60 is cost-effective regardless of 10-year CVD risk. For other age groups, it is also cost-effective to treat regardless of risk, except in younger women.
降压药物治疗对有发生心血管疾病(CVD)风险的成年人是具有成本效益的。然而,在 CVD 风险较低的 1 期高血压(收缩压 140-159mmHg)人群中,其成本效益尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定启动降压药物治疗的 10 年 CVD 风险阈值,使患有 1 期高血压的成年人进行一级预防具有成本效益。使用英国国家医疗服务体系的观点,通过终生马尔可夫模型比较了降压药物治疗与不治疗的效果。分析的人群范围为 10 年 CVD 风险在 5%至 20%之间的个体。健康状态包括无 CVD 事件、CVD 和非 CVD 死亡以及 6 种非致命性 CVD 疾病。通过每质量调整生命年成本来比较干预措施。基础病例年龄为 60 岁,在 40 至 75 岁之间重复进行分析。该模型分别针对男性和女性进行了运行,根据每组的最低可能风险评估了阈值 CVD 风险。对于两性,在 10%的 CVD 风险下,治疗具有成本效益(增量成本效果比为男性每质量调整生命年 10017 英镑[14542 美元],女性每质量调整生命年 8635 英镑[12536 美元])。在概率和确定性敏感性分析中,结果是稳健的,但对治疗效果敏感。无论年龄大小,男性都具有成本效益,而年龄大于 60 岁的女性也具有成本效益。对于 60 岁的人,无论 10 年 CVD 风险如何,启动 1 期高血压的治疗都是具有成本效益的。对于其他年龄组,无论风险如何,治疗都是具有成本效益的,但年轻女性除外。