Zhou Tianjing, Liu Qiuping, Zhang Minglu, Liu Xiaofei, Kang Jiali, Shen Peng, Lin Hongbo, Tang Xun, Gao Pei
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing 100191, China.
Yinzhou District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Ningbo 315101, Zhejiang, China.
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Jun 18;56(3):441-447. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.03.010.
To evaluate the health benefits and intervention efficiency of different strategies of initiating antihypertensive therapy for the primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in a community-based Chinese population from the Chinese electronic health records research in Yinzhou (CHERRY) study.
A decision-analytic Markov model was used to simulate and compare different antihypertensive initiation strategies, including: Strategy 1, initiation of antihypertensive therapy for Chinese adults with systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥140 mmHg (); Strategy 2, initiation of antihypertensive therapy for Chinese adults with SBP ≥130 mmHg; Strategy 3, initiation of antihypertensive therapy for Chinese adults with SBP≥140 mmHg, or with SBP between 130 and 140 mmHg and at high risk of cardiovascular diseases (/, , , ); Strategy 4, initiation of antihypertensive therapy for Chinese adults with SBP≥160 mmHg, or with SBP between 140 and 160 mmHg and at high risk of cardiovascular diseases (: ). The high 10-year cardiovascular risk was defined as the predicted risk over 10% based on the 2019 World Health Organization cardiovascular disease risk charts. Different strategies were simulated by the Markov model for ten years (cycles), with parameters mainly from the CHERRY study or published literature. After ten cycles of simulation, the numbers of quality-adjusted life years (QALY), cardiovascular events and all-cause deaths were calculated to evaluate the health benefits of each strategy, and the numbers needed to treat (NNT) for each cardiovascular event or all-cause death could be prevented were calculated to assess the intervention efficiency. One-way sensitivity analysis on the uncertainty of incidence rates of cardiovascular disease and probabilistic sensitivity analysis on the uncertainty of hazard ratios of interventions were conducted.
A total of 213 987 Chinese adults aged 35-79 years without cardiovascular diseases were included. Compared with strategy 1, the number of cardiovascular events that could be prevented in strategy 2 increased by 666 (95% : 334-975), while the NNT per cardiovascular event prevented increased by 10 (95% : 7-20). In contrast to strategy 1, the number of cardiovascular events that could be prevented in strategy 3 increased by 388 (95% : 194-569), and the NNT per cardiovascular event prevented decreased by 6 (95% : 4-12), suggesting that strategy 3 had better health benefits and intervention efficiency. Compared to strategy 1, although the number of cardiovascular events that could be prevented decreased by 193 (95% : 98-281) in strategy 4, the NNT per cardiovascular event prevented decreased by 18 (95% : 13-37) with better efficiency. The results were consistent in the sensitivity analyses.
When initiating antihypertensive therapy in an economically developed area of China, the strategy combined with cardiovascular risk assessment is more efficient than those purely based on the SBP threshold. The cardiovascular risk assessment strategy with different SBP thresholds is suggested to balance health benefits and intervention efficiency in diverse populations.
通过鄞州中国电子健康记录研究(CHERRY),评估在中国社区人群中,不同起始抗高血压治疗策略对心血管疾病一级预防的健康效益和干预效果。
采用决策分析马尔可夫模型模拟并比较不同的抗高血压起始策略,包括:策略1,对收缩压(SBP)≥140 mmHg的中国成年人起始抗高血压治疗;策略2,对SBP≥130 mmHg的中国成年人起始抗高血压治疗;策略3,对SBP≥140 mmHg或SBP在130至140 mmHg之间且有心血管疾病高风险(根据……)的中国成年人起始抗高血压治疗;策略4,对SBP≥160 mmHg或SBP在140至160 mmHg之间且有心血管疾病高风险(根据……)的中国成年人起始抗高血压治疗。10年心血管高风险定义为根据2019年世界卫生组织心血管疾病风险图表预测风险超过10%。马尔可夫模型对不同策略进行10年(周期)模拟,参数主要来自CHERRY研究或已发表文献。模拟10个周期后,计算质量调整生命年(QALY)数、心血管事件数和全因死亡数,以评估各策略的健康效益,并计算预防每一心血管事件或全因死亡所需治疗人数(NNT),以评估干预效果。对心血管疾病发病率的不确定性进行单向敏感性分析,对干预风险比的不确定性进行概率敏感性分析。
共纳入213987名35至79岁无心血管疾病的中国成年人。与策略1相比,策略2可预防的心血管事件数增加666例(95%置信区间:334 - 975),而预防每一心血管事件的NNT增加10例(95%置信区间:7 - 20)。与策略1相比,策略3可预防的心血管事件数增加388例(95%置信区间:194 - 569),预防每一心血管事件的NNT减少6例(95%置信区间:4 - 12),表明策略3具有更好的健康效益和干预效果。与策略1相比,尽管策略4可预防的心血管事件数减少193例(95%置信区间:98 - 281),但预防每一心血管事件的NNT减少18例(95%置信区间:13 - 37),效率更高。敏感性分析结果一致。
在中国经济发达地区起始抗高血压治疗时,结合心血管风险评估的策略比单纯基于SBP阈值的策略更有效。建议采用不同SBP阈值的心血管风险评估策略,以平衡不同人群的健康效益和干预效果。