Shalowitz M U, Eng J S, McKinney C O, Krohn J, Lapin B, Wang C-H, Nodine E
NorthShore University HealthSystem Research Institute, Evanston, IL, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Nutr Diabetes. 2017 May 15;7(5):e277. doi: 10.1038/nutd.2017.18.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Successful Type 2 diabetes management requires adopting a high nutrient-density diet made up of food items that both meet dietary needs and preferences and can be feasibly obtained on a regular basis. However, access to affordable, nutrient-dense foods often is lacking in poorer neighbourhoods. Therefore, low food security should directly impair glucose control, even when patients have full access to and utilize comprehensive medical management. The present study sought to determine whether food security is related longitudinally to glucose control, over-and-above ongoing medication management, among Type 2 diabetes patients receiving comprehensive care at a Midwestern multi-site federally qualified health centre (FQHC).
SUBJECTS/METHODS: In this longitudinal observational study, we completed a baseline assessment of patients' food security (using the US Household Food Security Module), demographics (via Census items), and diabetes history/management (using a structured clinical encounter form) when patients began receiving diabetes care at the health centre. We then recorded those patients' A1C levels several times during a 24-month follow-up period. Three hundred and ninety-nine patients (56% with low food security) had a baseline A1c measurement; a subsample of 336 (median age=52 years; 56% female; 60% Hispanic, 27% African American, and 9% White) also had at least one follow-up A1c measurement.
Patients with lower (vs higher) food security were more likely to be on insulin and have higher A1c levels at baseline. Moreover, the disparity in glucose control by food security status persisted throughout the next 2 years.
Although results were based on one multi-site FQHC, potentially limiting their generalizability, they seem to suggest that among Type 2 diabetes patients, low food security directly impairs glucose control-even when patients receive full access to comprehensive medical management-thereby increasing their long-term risks of high morbidity, early mortality, and high health-care utilization and cost.
背景/目的:成功管理2型糖尿病需要采用高营养密度饮食,这种饮食由既能满足饮食需求和偏好又能定期切实获取的食物组成。然而,贫困社区往往缺乏获取价格合理、营养丰富食物的途径。因此,即使患者能够充分获得并利用全面的医疗管理,粮食安全状况不佳也应会直接损害血糖控制。本研究旨在确定在一家中西部多地点联邦合格健康中心(FQHC)接受综合护理的2型糖尿病患者中,除了持续的药物治疗管理外,粮食安全状况与血糖控制之间是否存在纵向关联。
受试者/方法:在这项纵向观察性研究中,当患者开始在健康中心接受糖尿病护理时,我们完成了对患者粮食安全状况(使用美国家庭粮食安全模块)、人口统计学特征(通过人口普查项目)以及糖尿病病史/管理情况(使用结构化临床问诊表)的基线评估。然后,我们在24个月的随访期内多次记录这些患者的糖化血红蛋白(A1C)水平。399名患者(56%粮食安全状况不佳)进行了基线A1C测量;336名患者的子样本(中位年龄 = 52岁;56%为女性;60%为西班牙裔,27%为非裔美国人,9%为白人)也至少进行了一次随访A1C测量。
粮食安全状况较低(与较高相比)的患者更有可能使用胰岛素,且基线时A1C水平更高。此外,在接下来的两年中,粮食安全状况导致的血糖控制差异持续存在。
尽管结果基于一家多地点FQHC,可能会限制其普遍性,但这些结果似乎表明,在2型糖尿病患者中,即使患者能够充分获得全面的医疗管理,粮食安全状况不佳也会直接损害血糖控制,从而增加他们长期出现高发病率、早期死亡率以及高医疗利用率和成本的风险。