Caan Bette J, Meyerhardt Jeffrey A, Kroenke Candyce H, Alexeeff Stacey, Xiao Jingjie, Weltzien Erin, Feliciano Elizabeth Cespedes, Castillo Adrienne L, Quesenberry Charles P, Kwan Marilyn L, Prado Carla M
Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California.
Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 Jul;26(7):1008-1015. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0200. Epub 2017 May 15.
Body composition may partially explain the U-shaped association between body mass index (BMI) and colorectal cancer survival. Muscle and adiposity at colorectal cancer diagnosis and survival were examined in a retrospective cohort using Kaplan-Meier curves, multivariable Cox regression, and restricted cubic splines in 3,262 early-stage (I-III) male (50%) and female (50%) patients. Sarcopenia was defined using optimal stratification and sex- and BMI-specific cut points. High adiposity was defined as the highest tertile of sex-specific total adipose tissue (TAT). Primary outcomes were overall mortality and colorectal cancer-specific mortality (CRCsM). Slightly over 42% patients were sarcopenic. During 5.8 years of follow-up, 788 deaths occurred, including 433 from colorectal cancer. Sarcopenic patients had a 27% [HR, 1.27; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.09-1.48] higher risk of overall mortality than those who were not sarcopenic. Females with both low muscle and high adiposity had a 64% higher risk of overall mortality (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.05-2.57) than females with adequate muscle and lower adiposity. The lowest risk of overall mortality was seen in patients with a BMI between 25 and <30 kg/m, a range associated with the greatest number of patients (58.6%) who were not at increased risk of overall mortality due to either low muscle or high adiposity. Sarcopenia is prevalent among patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer, and should, along with adiposity be a standard oncological marker. Our findings suggest a biologic explanation for the obesity paradox in colorectal cancer and refute the notion that the association between overweight and lower mortality is due solely to methodologic biases. .
身体组成可能部分解释了体重指数(BMI)与结直肠癌生存率之间的U型关联。在一项回顾性队列研究中,采用Kaplan-Meier曲线、多变量Cox回归和受限立方样条,对3262例早期(I-III期)男性(50%)和女性(50%)患者的结直肠癌诊断时的肌肉和肥胖情况及其生存率进行了研究。采用最佳分层以及性别和BMI特异性切点来定义肌肉减少症。高肥胖定义为性别特异性总脂肪组织(TAT)的最高三分位数。主要结局为全因死亡率和结直肠癌特异性死亡率(CRCsM)。略超过42%的患者存在肌肉减少症。在5.8年的随访期间,发生了788例死亡,其中433例死于结直肠癌。肌肉减少症患者的全因死亡风险比非肌肉减少症患者高27%[风险比(HR),1.27;95%置信区间(CI),1.09 - 1.48]。肌肉量低且肥胖程度高的女性的全因死亡风险比肌肉量充足且肥胖程度低的女性高64%(HR,1.64;95%CI,1.05 - 2.57)。BMI在25至<30 kg/m之间的患者全因死亡风险最低,该范围内患者数量最多(58.6%),这些患者不会因肌肉量低或肥胖程度高而增加全因死亡风险。肌肉减少症在非转移性结直肠癌患者中普遍存在,应与肥胖程度一起作为标准的肿瘤学标志物。我们的研究结果为结直肠癌中的肥胖悖论提供了生物学解释,并反驳了超重与较低死亡率之间的关联仅归因于方法学偏倚的观点。