Rodriguez Nathan J
University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point, Stevens Point, Wisconsin, USA.
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2016 Aug 12;3:2333393616663304. doi: 10.1177/2333393616663304. eCollection 2016 Jan-Dec.
Vaccine-preventable diseases have re-emerged as more individuals have strayed from the recommended inoculation schedule. Previous work on vaccine hesitancy is generally limited to content analyses. Using grounded theory, this project examines vaccine debates on a prominent discussion board over a period of five years. Individuals generally justified opposition or hesitancy toward vaccines through personal experience and/or research, and the concepts of narrative persuasion and the conflation of expertise help describe the most prominent characteristics of such discourse. A consideration of online comments regarding vaccinations allows practitioners to not only become better prepared for patient concerns they might encounter, and but also become more familiar with the types of anecdotes and narratives that may be influential but left unspoken in face-to-face conversations.
随着越来越多的人偏离推荐的接种计划，疫苗可预防疾病再度出现。先前关于疫苗犹豫的研究通常局限于内容分析。本项目运用扎根理论，对一个知名讨论板上五年间的疫苗辩论进行了研究。人们通常通过个人经历和/或研究来为反对或犹豫接种疫苗找理由，叙事说服和专业知识混淆的概念有助于描述此类话语最显著的特征。考虑关于疫苗接种的在线评论，不仅能让从业者更好地应对可能遇到的患者担忧，还能让他们更熟悉那些可能有影响力但在面对面交谈中未被提及的轶事和叙事类型。
