Pearson Dominic A S, McDougall Cynthia
University of Portsmouth, King Henry Building, King Henry I Street, Portsmouth, PO1 2DY, United Kingdom.
University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.
Behav Sci Law. 2017 May;35(3):239-252. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2288. Epub 2017 May 16.
In response to the risk of serious further offences, an evidence-based approach is needed in risk management. A recent joint prison-probation inspection of the management of life sentence prisoners in six U.K. prisons found that the quality of assessment and plans to manage risk of harm to others was insufficient, with too much focus on the offender's verbal account. The present paper discusses observations of regular prisoner behaviour as the basis for predictions, and summarizes results of an evaluation of this methodology based on a sample of high-risk category prisoners released into the community. Prison behaviour has not traditionally been seen as a valid risk marker for violent recidivism, which may be because typically only conspicuous high-level behaviours are considered by risk management panels. Our research suggests that we are neglecting a valuable source of information on risk by failing to observe on-going and consistent pre-release behaviour. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
针对严重再犯罪风险,风险管理需要采取循证方法。最近对英国六所监狱无期徒刑犯管理情况进行的监狱-缓刑联合检查发现,对伤害他人风险的评估质量和管理计划存在不足,过于关注罪犯的口头陈述。本文讨论将常规囚犯行为观察作为预测依据,并总结基于释放到社区的高风险类别囚犯样本对该方法的评估结果。传统上,监狱行为并未被视为暴力再犯的有效风险指标,这可能是因为风险管理小组通常只考虑明显的高级别行为。我们的研究表明,由于未能观察到释放前持续且一致的行为,我们忽视了一个有价值的风险信息来源。版权所有© 2017约翰·威利父子有限公司。