• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

罪犯和缓刑犯暴力再犯预测:荷兰验证研究(OxRec)。

Prediction of violent reoffending in prisoners and individuals on probation: a Dutch validation study (OxRec).

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 29;9(1):841. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37539-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-37539-x
PMID:30696902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6351626/
Abstract

Scalable and transparent methods for risk assessment are increasingly required in criminal justice to inform decisions about sentencing, release, parole, and probation. However, few such approaches exist and their validation in external settings is typically lacking. A total national sample of all offenders (9072 released from prisoners and 6329 individuals on probation) from 2011-2012 in the Netherlands were followed up for violent and any reoffending over 2 years. The sample was mostly male (n = 574 [6%] were female prisoners and n = 784 [12%] were female probationers), and median ages were 30 in the prison sample and 34 in those on probation. Predictors for a scalable risk assessment tool (OxRec) were extracted from a routinely collected dataset used by criminal justice agencies, and outcomes from official criminal registers. OxRec's predictive performance in terms of discrimination and calibration was tested. Reoffending rates in the Dutch prisoner cohort were 16% for 2-year violent reoffending and 44% for 2-year any reoffending, with lower rates in the probation sample. Discrimination as measured by the c-index was moderate, at 0.68 (95% CI: 0.66-0.70) for 2-year violent reoffending in prisoners and between 0.65 and 0.68 for other outcomes and the probation sample. The model required recalibration, after which calibration performance was adequate (e.g. calibration in the large was 1.0 for all scenarios). A recalibrated model for OxRec can be used in the Netherlands for individuals released from prison and individuals on probation to stratify their risk of future violent and any reoffending. The approach that we outline can be considered for external validations of criminal justice and clinical risk models.

摘要

在刑事司法中,越来越需要可扩展且透明的风险评估方法,以辅助量刑、释放、假释和缓刑等决策。然而,目前此类方法很少,且其在外部环境中的验证通常也较为缺乏。我们对 2011-2012 年荷兰所有罪犯(9072 名出狱犯人和 6329 名缓刑犯)进行了全国性随访,观察其在 2 年内的暴力和任何重新犯罪情况。该样本中大多数为男性(n=574[6%]为女性囚犯,n=784[12%]为女性缓刑犯),年龄中位数分别为监狱样本中的 30 岁和缓刑样本中的 34 岁。可扩展风险评估工具(OxRec)的预测因子从刑事司法机构使用的常规数据集和官方犯罪记录中提取,评估结果来自官方犯罪记录。我们对 OxRec 的预测性能(区分度和校准度)进行了测试。荷兰囚犯队列的再犯率为 2 年内暴力再犯率为 16%,任何再犯率为 44%,而缓刑样本中的再犯率较低。以 c 指数衡量的区分度为中度,监狱中 2 年内暴力再犯的 c 指数为 0.68(95%CI:0.66-0.70),其他结果和缓刑样本的 c 指数在 0.65 至 0.68 之间。该模型需要重新校准,之后校准性能较为理想(例如,在大样本中所有场景的校准度均为 1.0)。经重新校准的 OxRec 模型可用于荷兰出狱犯人和缓刑犯,以分层其未来暴力和任何再犯的风险。我们概述的方法可用于刑事司法和临床风险模型的外部验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73b3/6351626/1c38d24e69cd/41598_2018_37539_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73b3/6351626/e84f9f73d51d/41598_2018_37539_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73b3/6351626/d8c3dd79529e/41598_2018_37539_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73b3/6351626/1c38d24e69cd/41598_2018_37539_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73b3/6351626/e84f9f73d51d/41598_2018_37539_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73b3/6351626/d8c3dd79529e/41598_2018_37539_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73b3/6351626/1c38d24e69cd/41598_2018_37539_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Prediction of violent reoffending in prisoners and individuals on probation: a Dutch validation study (OxRec).罪犯和缓刑犯暴力再犯预测:荷兰验证研究(OxRec)。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 29;9(1):841. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37539-x.
2
Prediction of violent reoffending on release from prison: derivation and external validation of a scalable tool.预测出狱后暴力再犯罪:一种可扩展工具的推导与外部验证
Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;3(6):535-43. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)00103-6. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
3
Predicting Violent Reoffending in Individuals Released From Prison in a Lower-Middle-Income Country: A Validation of OxRec in Tajikistan.预测中低收入国家出狱人员的暴力再犯罪情况:塔吉克斯坦对OxRec的验证
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 25;13:805141. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.805141. eCollection 2022.
4
Development and Validation of a Prediction Tool for Reoffending Risk in Domestic Violence.家庭暴力再犯风险预测工具的开发与验证。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2325494. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.25494.
5
Prediction of violent reoffending in people released from prison in England: External validation study of a risk assessment tool (OxRec).英格兰出狱人员暴力再犯罪的预测:一种风险评估工具(OxRec)的外部验证研究
J Crim Justice. 2023 May;86:102061. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2023.102061.
6
Association Between Prescription of Major Psychotropic Medications and Violent Reoffending After Prison Release.主要精神药物处方与出狱后暴力再犯罪之间的关联。
JAMA. 2016 Nov 1;316(17):1798-1807. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.15380.
7
Psychiatric disorders and violent reoffending: a national cohort study of convicted prisoners in Sweden.精神疾病与暴力再犯罪:瑞典已定罪囚犯的全国队列研究。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;2(10):891-900. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00234-5. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
8
Sadism and Violent Reoffending in Sexual Offenders.性犯罪者中的施虐癖与暴力再犯
Sex Abuse. 2016 Feb;28(1):46-72. doi: 10.1177/1079063214566715. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
9
Women Released From Custody: Investigating Risk Factors and Reoffending.从拘留所获释的女性:调查风险因素与再次犯罪情况
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2019 Oct;63(13):2239-2263. doi: 10.1177/0306624X19845778. Epub 2019 May 12.
10
Effectiveness of aggression replacement training in reducing criminal recidivism among convicted adult offenders.攻击性替代训练在减少成年罪犯再犯罪方面的有效性。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2018 Dec;28(6):476-491. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2092. Epub 2018 Oct 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of violent reoffending in people released from prison in England: External validation study of a risk assessment tool (OxRec).英格兰出狱人员暴力再犯罪的预测:一种风险评估工具(OxRec)的外部验证研究
J Crim Justice. 2023 May;86:102061. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2023.102061.
2
Evidence-based sentencing and scientific evidence.循证量刑与科学证据。
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 14;14:1309141. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1309141. eCollection 2023.
3
Towards a More Evidence-Based Risk Assessment for People in the Criminal Justice System: the Case of OxRec in the Netherlands.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation in prediction research: the waste by data splitting.预测研究中的验证:数据分割造成的浪费。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Nov;103:131-133. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.07.010. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
2
Selecting a risk assessment tool to use in practice:a 10-point guide.选择在实践中使用的风险评估工具:十点指南。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2018 May;21(2):41-43. doi: 10.1136/eb-2017-102861. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
3
Identification of low risk of violent crime in severe mental illness with a clinical prediction tool (Oxford Mental Illness and Violence tool [OxMIV]): a derivation and validation study.
迈向对刑事司法系统中的人群进行更基于证据的风险评估:以荷兰的OxRec为例。
Eur J Crim Pol Res. 2022;28(3):397-406. doi: 10.1007/s10610-022-09520-y. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
4
Predicting Violent Reoffending in Individuals Released From Prison in a Lower-Middle-Income Country: A Validation of OxRec in Tajikistan.预测中低收入国家出狱人员的暴力再犯罪情况:塔吉克斯坦对OxRec的验证
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 25;13:805141. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.805141. eCollection 2022.
使用临床预测工具(牛津精神疾病与暴力工具[OxMIV])识别严重精神疾病患者暴力犯罪低风险:一项推导与验证研究。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;4(6):461-468. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30109-8. Epub 2017 May 4.
4
PCL-R field validity in prison and hospital settings.《精神病态量表修订版》在监狱和医院环境中的效标效度。
Law Hum Behav. 2017 Feb;41(1):29-43. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000222. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
5
A review of statistical updating methods for clinical prediction models.临床预测模型的统计更新方法综述。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Jan;27(1):185-197. doi: 10.1177/0962280215626466. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
6
Performance of recidivism risk assessment instruments in U.S. correctional settings.美国惩教机构中累犯风险评估工具的表现。
Psychol Serv. 2016 Aug;13(3):206-222. doi: 10.1037/ser0000075. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
7
Prediction of violent reoffending on release from prison: derivation and external validation of a scalable tool.预测出狱后暴力再犯罪:一种可扩展工具的推导与外部验证
Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;3(6):535-43. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)00103-6. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
8
Web-Based Violence Risk Monitoring Tool in Psychoses: Pilot Study in Community Forensic Patients.基于网络的精神病暴力风险监测工具:社区法医患者的试点研究
J Forensic Psychol Pract. 2016 Jan 1;16(1):49-59. doi: 10.1080/15228932.2016.1128301. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
9
External validation of multivariable prediction models: a systematic review of methodological conduct and reporting.多变量预测模型的外部验证:方法学实施和报告的系统评价。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Mar 19;14:40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-40.
10
Rates of violence in patients classified as high risk by structured risk assessment instruments.通过结构化风险评估工具被归类为高风险的患者中的暴力发生率。
Br J Psychiatry. 2014 Mar;204(3):180-7. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.131938.