• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The impact of simulated motion blur on lesion detection performance in full-field digital mammography.模拟运动模糊对全视野数字化乳腺摄影中病变检测性能的影响。
Br J Radiol. 2017 Jul;90(1075):20160871. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160871. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
2
Clinical performance metrics of 3D stereoscopic digital mammography compared with 2D digital mammography: observer study.3D立体数字化乳腺摄影与2D数字化乳腺摄影的临床性能指标比较:观察者研究
Br J Radiol. 2018 Jun;91(1086):20170908. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170908. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
3
The effect of image processing on the detection of cancers in digital mammography.图像处理对数字乳腺摄影中癌症检测的影响。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Aug;203(2):387-93. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11812.
4
Blurred digital mammography images: an analysis of technical recall and observer detection performance.乳腺数字钼靶模糊图像:技术召回率与观察者检测性能分析
Br J Radiol. 2017 Mar;90(1071):20160271. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160271. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
5
A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging.一项比较数字乳腺摄影、乳腺断层合成和锥形束CT乳腺成像的病变检测准确性的计算机模拟研究。
Med Phys. 2006 Apr;33(4):1041-52. doi: 10.1118/1.2174127.
6
Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms.全视野数字化乳腺钼靶片上微钙化簇的计算机辅助检测
Med Phys. 2006 Aug;33(8):2975-88. doi: 10.1118/1.2211710.
7
Simulated lesion, human observer performance comparison between thin-section dedicated breast CT images versus computed thick-section simulated projection images of the breast.模拟病变,乳腺薄层专用CT图像与乳腺厚层模拟投影图像之间的人体观察者性能比较。
Phys Med Biol. 2015 Apr 21;60(8):3347-58. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/8/3347. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
8
Performance of computer-aided detection applied to full-field digital mammography in detection of breast cancers.计算机辅助检测在全数字化乳腺摄影中对乳腺癌检测的性能。
Eur J Radiol. 2011 Mar;77(3):457-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.08.024. Epub 2009 Oct 28.
9
Investigation of optimal use of computer-aided detection systems: the role of the "machine" in decision making process.探讨计算机辅助检测系统的最佳使用方式:“机器”在决策过程中的作用。
Acad Radiol. 2010 Sep;17(9):1112-21. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.04.010. Epub 2010 Jun 3.
10
Detection of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis using complementary information of simulated projection.利用模拟投影的互补信息在数字乳腺断层合成中检测肿块。
Med Phys. 2015 Dec;42(12):7043-58. doi: 10.1118/1.4935533.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting the quality of digital mammography from the perspective of detectability of microcalcifications: A Radiomics approach.从微钙化灶可检测性角度预测数字化乳腺摄影质量:一种放射组学方法。
Med Phys. 2025 Aug;52(8):e18061. doi: 10.1002/mp.18061.
2
Technical feasibility of automated blur detection in digital mammography using convolutional neural network.使用卷积神经网络实现数字乳腺摄影中自动模糊检测的技术可行性。
Eur Radiol Exp. 2024 Nov 18;8(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s41747-024-00527-0.
3
Analysis of Technical Repeat Studies in Screening Mammography.乳腺钼靶筛查中的技术重复研究分析
J Breast Imaging. 2023 Jun 19;5(4):416-424. doi: 10.1093/jbi/wbad039. eCollection 2023 Jul-Aug.
4
Is it blur or is it texture? An analysis of computational blur and texture measures commonly used in medical image analysis.这是模糊还是纹理?医学图像分析中常用的计算模糊和纹理度量分析。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2023 Feb;10(Suppl 1):S11920. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.10.S1.S11920. Epub 2023 May 24.
5
Differences between human and machine perception in medical diagnosis.人类与机器在医学诊断中的感知差异。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 27;12(1):6877. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10526-z.
6
Errors in Mammography Cannot be Solved Through Technology Alone.乳腺摄影中的错误不能仅通过技术来解决。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018 Feb 26;19(2):291-301. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.2.291.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of motion during the breast clamping phase of mammography.乳腺钼靶检查中乳房夹紧阶段的运动分析。
Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1059):20150715. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150715. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
2
What is the minimum amount of simulated breast movement required for visual detection of blurring? An exploratory investigation.视觉检测模糊所需的模拟乳房运动的最小量是多少?一项探索性研究。
Br J Radiol. 2015 Aug;88(1052):20150126. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150126. Epub 2015 May 27.
3
Impact of full field digital mammography on the classification and mammographic characteristics of interval breast cancers.全视野数字化乳腺摄影对间期乳腺癌分类及乳腺摄影特征的影响。
Eur J Radiol. 2015 Jun;84(6):1056-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.03.007. Epub 2015 Mar 14.
4
Mammographic artifacts on full-field digital mammography.全视野数字乳腺摄影中的乳腺摄影伪影。
J Digit Imaging. 2014 Apr;27(2):231-6. doi: 10.1007/s10278-013-9641-4.
5
Correlation of free-response and receiver-operating-characteristic area-under-the-curve estimates: results from independently conducted FROC∕ROC studies in mammography.自由响应和接收者操作特性曲线下面积估计的相关性:来自独立进行的乳腺摄影 FROC/ROC 研究的结果。
Med Phys. 2012 Oct;39(10):5917-29. doi: 10.1118/1.4747262.
6
ROCView: prototype software for data collection in jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis.ROCView:用于自举法替代自由反应接收器操作特性分析中数据收集的原型软件。
Br J Radiol. 2012 Sep;85(1017):1320-6. doi: 10.1259/bjr/99497945. Epub 2012 May 9.
7
New developments in observer performance methodology in medical imaging.医学影像中观察者性能方法学的新进展。
Semin Nucl Med. 2011 Nov;41(6):401-18. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2011.07.001.
8
Does subcutaneous adipose tissue behave as an (anti-)thixotropic material?皮下脂肪组织是否表现为(反)触变材料?
J Biomech. 2010 Apr 19;43(6):1153-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.11.037. Epub 2010 Feb 19.
9
Comparison of digital mammography and screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening: a review in the Irish breast screening program.数字乳腺摄影与屏-片乳腺摄影在乳腺癌筛查中的比较:爱尔兰乳腺筛查项目综述
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Oct;193(4):1010-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.2157.
10
Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparison within the UK breast screening program and systematic review of published data.全视野数字化乳腺摄影与屏-片乳腺摄影:英国乳腺筛查项目内的比较及已发表数据的系统评价
Radiology. 2009 May;251(2):347-58. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2512081235.

模拟运动模糊对全视野数字化乳腺摄影中病变检测性能的影响。

The impact of simulated motion blur on lesion detection performance in full-field digital mammography.

作者信息

Abdullah Ahmed K, Kelly Judith, Thompson John D, Mercer Claire E, Aspin Rob, Hogg Peter

机构信息

1 University of Diyala, Baqubah, Diyala, Iraq.

2 Directorate of Radiography, University of Salford, Greater Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Br J Radiol. 2017 Jul;90(1075):20160871. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160871. Epub 2017 Jun 16.

DOI:10.1259/bjr.20160871
PMID:28508724
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5594981/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Motion blur is a known phenomenon in full-field digital mammography, but the impact on lesion detection is unknown. This is the first study to investigate detection performance with varying magnitudes of simulated motion blur.

METHODS

7 observers (15 ± 5 years' reporting experience) evaluated 248 cases (62 containing malignant masses, 62 containing malignant microcalcifications and 124 normal cases) for 3 conditions: no blurring (0 mm) and 2 magnitudes of simulated blurring (0.7 and 1.5 mm). Abnormal cases were biopsy proven. Mathematical simulation was used to provide a pixel shift in order to simulate motion blur. A free-response observer study was conducted to compare lesion detection performance for the three conditions. The equally weighted jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic was used as the figure of merit. Test alpha was set at 0.05 to control probability of Type I error.

RESULTS

The equally weighted jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis found a statistically significant difference in lesion detection performance for both masses [F(2,22) = 6.01, p = 0.0084] and microcalcifications [F(2,49) = 23.14, p < 0.0001]. The figures of merit reduced as the magnitude of simulated blurring increased. Statistical differences were found between some of the pairs investigated for the detection of masses (0.0 vs 0.7 and 0.0 vs 1.5 mm) and all pairs for microcalcifications (0.0 vs 0.7, 0.0 vs 1.5 and 0.7 vs 1.5 mm). No difference was detected between 0.7 and 1.5 mm for masses.

CONCLUSION

The mathematical simulation of motion blur caused a statistically significant reduction in lesion detection performance. These false-negative decisions could have implications for clinical practice. Advances in knowledge: This research demonstrates for the first time that motion blur has a negative and statistically significant impact on lesion detection performance in digital mammography.

摘要

目的

运动模糊是全视野数字化乳腺摄影中一种已知现象,但对病变检测的影响尚不清楚。这是第一项研究不同程度模拟运动模糊下检测性能的研究。

方法

7名观察者(报告经验为15±5年)对248例病例(62例含有恶性肿块,62例含有恶性微钙化,124例正常病例)进行3种情况的评估:无模糊(0毫米)和2种程度的模拟模糊(0.7和1.5毫米)。异常病例经活检证实。使用数学模拟来提供像素偏移以模拟运动模糊。进行了一项自由反应观察者研究,以比较三种情况下的病变检测性能。采用等权重留一法替代自由反应接收器操作特性作为评估指标。将检验α设定为0.05以控制I型错误的概率。

结果

等权重留一法替代自由反应接收器操作特性分析发现,对于肿块[F(2,22)=6.01,p=0.0084]和微钙化[F(2,49)=23.14,p<0.0001],病变检测性能存在统计学显著差异。随着模拟模糊程度的增加,评估指标降低。在检测肿块的一些研究对之间(0.0对0.7和0.0对1.5毫米)以及微钙化的所有对之间(0.0对0.7、0.0对1.5和0.7对1.5毫米)发现了统计学差异。对于肿块,0.7和1.5毫米之间未检测到差异。

结论

运动模糊的数学模拟导致病变检测性能出现统计学显著下降。这些假阴性结果可能对临床实践产生影响。知识进展:本研究首次证明运动模糊对数字化乳腺摄影中的病变检测性能有负面且统计学显著的影响。