Ma Wang Kei, Borgen Rita, Kelly Judith, Millington Sara, Hilton Beverley, Aspin Rob, Lança Carla, Hogg Peter
1 Department of Radiography, University of Salford, Salford, UK.
2 East Lancashire Breast Screening Unit, Burnley General Hospital, Burnley, UK.
Br J Radiol. 2017 Mar;90(1071):20160271. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160271. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
Blurred images in full-field digital mammography are a problem in the UK Breast Screening Programme. Technical recalls may be due to blurring not being seen on lower resolution monitors used for review. This study assesses the visual detection of blurring on a 2.3-MP monitor and a 5-MP report grade monitor and proposes an observer standard for the visual detection of blurring on a 5-MP reporting grade monitor.
28 observers assessed 120 images for blurring; 20 images had no blurring present, whereas 100 images had blurring imposed through mathematical simulation at 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0 mm levels of motion. Technical recall rate for both monitors and angular size at each level of motion were calculated. χ tests were used to test whether significant differences in blurring detection existed between 2.3- and 5-MP monitors.
The technical recall rate for 2.3- and 5-MP monitors are 20.3% and 9.1%, respectively. The angular size for 0.2- to 1-mm motion varied from 55 to 275 arc s. The minimum amount of motion for visual detection of blurring in this study is 0.4 mm. For 0.2-mm simulated motion, there was no significant difference [χ (1, N = 1095) = 1.61, p = 0.20] in blurring detection between the 2.3- and 5-MP monitors.
According to this study, monitors ≤2.3 MP are not suitable for technical review of full-field digital mammography images for the detection of blur. Advances in knowledge: This research proposes the first observer standard for the visual detection of blurring.
在英国乳腺筛查项目中,全视野数字化乳腺摄影中的模糊图像是个问题。技术召回可能是因为在用于复查的低分辨率显示器上未发现模糊。本研究评估了在2.3兆像素显示器和5兆像素报告级显示器上对模糊的视觉检测,并提出了在5兆像素报告级显示器上视觉检测模糊的观察者标准。
28名观察者评估120幅图像是否模糊;20幅图像未出现模糊,而100幅图像通过数学模拟在0.2、0.4、0.6、0.8和1.0毫米运动水平施加了模糊。计算了两种显示器的技术召回率以及每个运动水平下的角大小。采用χ检验来测试2.3兆像素和5兆像素显示器在模糊检测方面是否存在显著差异。
2.3兆像素和5兆像素显示器的技术召回率分别为20.3%和9.1%。0.2至1毫米运动的角大小在55至275角秒之间变化。本研究中视觉检测到模糊的最小运动量为0.4毫米。对于0.2毫米的模拟运动,2.3兆像素和5兆像素显示器在模糊检测方面没有显著差异[χ(1, N = 1095) = 1.61, p = 0.20]。
根据本研究,≤2.3兆像素的显示器不适用于全视野数字化乳腺摄影图像模糊检测的技术复查。知识进展:本研究提出了首个视觉检测模糊的观察者标准。