• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Blurred digital mammography images: an analysis of technical recall and observer detection performance.乳腺数字钼靶模糊图像:技术召回率与观察者检测性能分析
Br J Radiol. 2017 Mar;90(1071):20160271. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160271. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
2
The impact of simulated motion blur on lesion detection performance in full-field digital mammography.模拟运动模糊对全视野数字化乳腺摄影中病变检测性能的影响。
Br J Radiol. 2017 Jul;90(1075):20160871. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160871. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
3
What is the minimum amount of simulated breast movement required for visual detection of blurring? An exploratory investigation.视觉检测模糊所需的模拟乳房运动的最小量是多少?一项探索性研究。
Br J Radiol. 2015 Aug;88(1052):20150126. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150126. Epub 2015 May 27.
4
Clinical performance metrics of 3D stereoscopic digital mammography compared with 2D digital mammography: observer study.3D立体数字化乳腺摄影与2D数字化乳腺摄影的临床性能指标比较:观察者研究
Br J Radiol. 2018 Jun;91(1086):20170908. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170908. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
5
Diagnostic performance of detecting breast cancer on computed radiographic (CR) mammograms: comparison of hard copy film, 3-megapixel liquid-crystal-display (LCD) monitor and 5-megapixel LCD monitor.计算机X线摄影(CR)乳腺钼靶片检测乳腺癌的诊断性能:硬拷贝胶片、300万像素液晶显示器(LCD)和500万像素LCD显示器的比较
Eur Radiol. 2008 Nov;18(11):2363-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1016-8. Epub 2008 May 20.
6
Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study.数字乳腺断层合成:观察者性能研究。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Aug;193(2):586-91. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.2031.
7
Visual-search observers for assessing tomographic x-ray image quality.用于评估断层X射线图像质量的视觉搜索观测器。
Med Phys. 2016 Mar;43(3):1563-75. doi: 10.1118/1.4942485.
8
9
[First experiments for the detection of simulated mammographic lesions: digital full field mammography with a new detector with a double plate of pure selenium].[检测模拟乳腺X线摄影病变的首次实验:使用带有纯硒双板新探测器的数字全场乳腺X线摄影]
Radiologe. 2011 Feb;51(2):130-4. doi: 10.1007/s00117-010-2077-7.
10
Detectability of BI-RADS category 3 or higher breast lesions and reading time on mammography: comparison between 5-MP and 8-MP LCD monitors.乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)3类或更高类别乳腺病变的可检测性及乳腺钼靶检查的阅片时间:500万像素(MP)与800万像素液晶显示器的比较
Acta Radiol. 2017 Apr;58(4):403-407. doi: 10.1177/0284185116653279. Epub 2016 Jul 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Technical feasibility of automated blur detection in digital mammography using convolutional neural network.使用卷积神经网络实现数字乳腺摄影中自动模糊检测的技术可行性。
Eur Radiol Exp. 2024 Nov 18;8(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s41747-024-00527-0.
2
Analysis of Technical Repeat Studies in Screening Mammography.乳腺钼靶筛查中的技术重复研究分析
J Breast Imaging. 2023 Jun 19;5(4):416-424. doi: 10.1093/jbi/wbad039. eCollection 2023 Jul-Aug.
3
Deep learning versus the human visual system for detecting motion blur in radiography.深度学习与人类视觉系统在检测X射线摄影中的运动模糊方面的比较。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2022 Jan;9(1):015501. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.9.1.015501. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
4
In silico imaging clinical trials: cheaper, faster, better, safer, and more scalable.计算机成像临床试验:更便宜、更快、更好、更安全、更具可扩展性。
Trials. 2021 Jan 19;22(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-05002-w.
5
Characterization of radiographers' mammography practice in five European countries: a pilot study.五个欧洲国家放射技师乳腺摄影实践的特征:一项试点研究。
Insights Imaging. 2019 Mar 13;10(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13244-019-0711-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of reconstruction methods and x-ray tube current-time product on nodule detection in an anthropomorphic thorax phantom: A crossed-modality JAFROC observer study.重建方法及X射线管电流-时间乘积对仿真人体胸部模型中结节检测的影响:一项交叉模态JAFROC观察者研究
Med Phys. 2016 Mar;43(3):1265-74. doi: 10.1118/1.4941017.
2
Analysis of motion during the breast clamping phase of mammography.乳腺钼靶检查中乳房夹紧阶段的运动分析。
Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1059):20150715. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150715. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
3
What is the minimum amount of simulated breast movement required for visual detection of blurring? An exploratory investigation.视觉检测模糊所需的模拟乳房运动的最小量是多少?一项探索性研究。
Br J Radiol. 2015 Aug;88(1052):20150126. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150126. Epub 2015 May 27.
4
Extra patient movement during mammographic imaging: an experimental study.乳腺钼靶成像过程中患者的额外移动:一项实验研究。
Br J Radiol. 2014 Dec;87(1044):20140241. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140241. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
5
A free-response evaluation determining value in the computed tomography attenuation correction image for revealing pulmonary incidental findings: a phantom study.一项关于在计算机断层扫描衰减校正图像中确定揭示肺部偶然发现的价值的自由反应评估:一项体模研究。
Acad Radiol. 2014 Apr;21(4):538-45. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.01.003.
6
Interrater variation in scoring radiological discrepancies.评分员在评估放射学差异方面的变异性。
Br J Radiol. 2013 Aug;86(1028):20130245. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20130245. Epub 2013 Jul 5.
7
Accurate localization of incidental findings on the computed tomography attenuation correction image: the influence of tube current variation.
Nucl Med Commun. 2013 Feb;34(2):180-4. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e32835c0984.
8
Diagnostic performance in differentiation of breast lesion on digital mammograms: comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel LCD monitor, and 5-megapixel LCD monitor.数字乳腺钼靶摄影中对乳腺病变的诊断性能:硬拷贝胶片、300 万像素液晶显示器和 500 万像素液晶显示器的比较。
Clin Imaging. 2011 Sep-Oct;35(5):341-5. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.08.015.
9
Does print size matter for reading? A review of findings from vision science and typography.印刷字体大小对阅读有影响吗?视觉科学与排版学研究结果综述。
J Vis. 2011 Aug 9;11(5):10.1167/11.5.8 8. doi: 10.1167/11.5.8.
10
Long radiology workdays reduce detection and accommodation accuracy.长时间的放射科工作日会降低检测和适应精度。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2010 Sep;7(9):698-704. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.03.004.

乳腺数字钼靶模糊图像:技术召回率与观察者检测性能分析

Blurred digital mammography images: an analysis of technical recall and observer detection performance.

作者信息

Ma Wang Kei, Borgen Rita, Kelly Judith, Millington Sara, Hilton Beverley, Aspin Rob, Lança Carla, Hogg Peter

机构信息

1 Department of Radiography, University of Salford, Salford, UK.

2 East Lancashire Breast Screening Unit, Burnley General Hospital, Burnley, UK.

出版信息

Br J Radiol. 2017 Mar;90(1071):20160271. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160271. Epub 2017 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1259/bjr.20160271
PMID:28134567
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5601529/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Blurred images in full-field digital mammography are a problem in the UK Breast Screening Programme. Technical recalls may be due to blurring not being seen on lower resolution monitors used for review. This study assesses the visual detection of blurring on a 2.3-MP monitor and a 5-MP report grade monitor and proposes an observer standard for the visual detection of blurring on a 5-MP reporting grade monitor.

METHODS

28 observers assessed 120 images for blurring; 20 images had no blurring present, whereas 100 images had blurring imposed through mathematical simulation at 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0 mm levels of motion. Technical recall rate for both monitors and angular size at each level of motion were calculated. χ tests were used to test whether significant differences in blurring detection existed between 2.3- and 5-MP monitors.

RESULTS

The technical recall rate for 2.3- and 5-MP monitors are 20.3% and 9.1%, respectively. The angular size for 0.2- to 1-mm motion varied from 55 to 275 arc s. The minimum amount of motion for visual detection of blurring in this study is 0.4 mm. For 0.2-mm simulated motion, there was no significant difference [χ (1, N = 1095) = 1.61, p = 0.20] in blurring detection between the 2.3- and 5-MP monitors.

CONCLUSION

According to this study, monitors ≤2.3 MP are not suitable for technical review of full-field digital mammography images for the detection of blur. Advances in knowledge: This research proposes the first observer standard for the visual detection of blurring.

摘要

目的

在英国乳腺筛查项目中,全视野数字化乳腺摄影中的模糊图像是个问题。技术召回可能是因为在用于复查的低分辨率显示器上未发现模糊。本研究评估了在2.3兆像素显示器和5兆像素报告级显示器上对模糊的视觉检测,并提出了在5兆像素报告级显示器上视觉检测模糊的观察者标准。

方法

28名观察者评估120幅图像是否模糊;20幅图像未出现模糊,而100幅图像通过数学模拟在0.2、0.4、0.6、0.8和1.0毫米运动水平施加了模糊。计算了两种显示器的技术召回率以及每个运动水平下的角大小。采用χ检验来测试2.3兆像素和5兆像素显示器在模糊检测方面是否存在显著差异。

结果

2.3兆像素和5兆像素显示器的技术召回率分别为20.3%和9.1%。0.2至1毫米运动的角大小在55至275角秒之间变化。本研究中视觉检测到模糊的最小运动量为0.4毫米。对于0.2毫米的模拟运动,2.3兆像素和5兆像素显示器在模糊检测方面没有显著差异[χ(1, N = 1095) = 1.61, p = 0.20]。

结论

根据本研究,≤2.3兆像素的显示器不适用于全视野数字化乳腺摄影图像模糊检测的技术复查。知识进展:本研究提出了首个视觉检测模糊的观察者标准。