Suppr超能文献

姑息治疗挑战:从各国协会视角分析欧洲姑息治疗整合的障碍与机遇

The Palliative Care Challenge: Analysis of Barriers and Opportunities to Integrate Palliative Care in Europe in the View of National Associations.

作者信息

Centeno Carlos, Garralda Eduardo, Carrasco José Miguel, den Herder-van der Eerden Marlieke, Aldridge Melissa, Stevenson David, Meier Diane E, Hasselaar Jeroen

机构信息

1 ATLANTES Research Programme, Institute for Culture and Society, University of Navarra , Pamplona, Spain .

2 Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA) , Pamplona, Spain .

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2017 Nov;20(11):1195-1204. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0039. Epub 2017 May 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Palliative care (PC) development is diverse and lacks an effective integration into European healthcare systems. This article investigates levels of integrated PC in European countries.

METHODS

A qualitative survey was undertaken for the 2013 EAPC Atlas of PC in Europe with boards of national associations, eliciting opinions on opportunities for, and barriers to, PC development.

ANALYSIS

Barriers and opportunities directly related to PC integration were identified and analyzed thematically according (1) to the dimensions of the World Health Organization (WHO) public health model and (2) by the degree of service provision in each country. A frequency analysis of dimensions and level of provision was also conducted.

RESULTS

In total, 48/53 (91%) European countries responded to the survey. A total of 43 barriers and 65 opportunities were identified as being related to PC integration. Main barriers were (1) lack of basic PC training, with a particular emphasis on the absence of teaching at the undergraduate level; (2) lack of official certification for professionals; (3) lack of coordination and continuity of care for users and providers; (4) lack of PC integration for noncancer patients; (5) absence of PC from countries' regulatory frameworks; and (6) unequal laws or regulations pertaining to PC within countries. Innovations in education and new regulatory frameworks were identified as main opportunities in some European countries, in addition to opportunities around the implementation of PC in home care, nursing home settings, and the earlier integration of PC into patients' continuum of care. With increasing provision of services, more challenges for the integration are detected (p < 0.005).

CONCLUSION

A set of barriers and opportunities to PC integration has been identified across Europe, by national associations, offering a barometer against which to check the challenge of integration across countries.

摘要

背景

姑息治疗(PC)的发展呈现多样化,且在欧洲医疗体系中缺乏有效的整合。本文调查了欧洲各国姑息治疗的整合水平。

方法

针对《2013年欧洲姑息治疗协会欧洲姑息治疗地图集》对各国协会委员会进行了定性调查,征集有关姑息治疗发展的机遇和障碍的意见。

分析

确定了与姑息治疗整合直接相关的障碍和机遇,并根据(1)世界卫生组织(WHO)公共卫生模式的维度以及(2)每个国家的服务提供程度进行了主题分析。还对维度和提供水平进行了频率分析。

结果

总共53个欧洲国家中有48个(91%)对调查做出了回应。共确定了43个与姑息治疗整合相关的障碍和65个机遇。主要障碍包括:(1)缺乏姑息治疗基础培训,尤其强调本科阶段缺乏相关教学;(2)专业人员缺乏官方认证;(3)患者和提供者缺乏护理协调与连续性;(4)非癌症患者的姑息治疗缺乏整合;(5)国家监管框架中没有姑息治疗相关内容;(6)各国有关姑息治疗的法律法规不平等。除了在家居护理、养老院环境中实施姑息治疗以及将姑息治疗更早地纳入患者连续护理过程中的机遇外,教育创新和新的监管框架在一些欧洲国家被视为主要机遇。随着服务提供的增加,发现整合面临更多挑战(p < 0.005)。

结论

各国协会在欧洲范围内确定了一系列姑息治疗整合的障碍和机遇,为检验各国整合面临的挑战提供了一个晴雨表。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验