Esmaeilivand Masoumeh, Khatony Alireza, Moradi Gholamreza, Najafi Farid, Abdi Alireza
Lecturer, Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Associate Professor, Department of Nursing, Nursing and Midwifery School, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Mar;11(3):OC43-OC46. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/23473.9547. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
Arterial blood sampling, used to assess patients in acute conditions, may result in complications such as thrombosis and embolism. However, it can be replaced by venous blood sampling, but there is a dearth of information on this.
To assess the correlation and agreement between the arterial and central venous blood gases analyses in patients undergoing elective Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) surgery.
In this cross-sectional study, 100 ICU patients undergoing elective CABG surgery were recruited. 2 mm arterial and a 2 mm venous blood samples were obtained from each patient's arterial and central venous lines, respectively. To predict Arterial Blood Gas (ABG) values based on central Venous Blood Gas (VBG) values, the linear regression analysis was used and for evaluating their agreement Bland-Altman method was used.
In total of 200 samples were obtained. The mean and Standard Deviation (SD) of age was 58.9±9.1 years and 51% of the participants were female. There was a strong correlation between ABG and central VBG values regarding pH, partial Pressure of Carbon Dioxide (PCO), Bicarbonate (HCO) and Base Excess (BE) (r= 0.73, r=0.74, r=0.67 and r=0.71, respectively; p<0.001); however, the correlation between the arterial and venous Partial Pressure of Oxygen (PO) and Oxygen Saturation (SO) was moderate (r=0.29, p=0.005 and r=0.27, p=0.006, respectively). The Bland-Altman analysis showed an excellent agreement between all the variables (p<0.001).
Central VBG analysis cannot replace ABG analysis in measuring exact PO status, necessitating arterial sampling in some matters, but with respect to the accuracy of pulse oximetry measurements in determining the exact PO status, for the rest of the indices a central VBG rather than an ABG can be utilised for determining patient's acid-base status. Particularly in patients who are hospitalised for a long time and have a central venous catheter in place like patients who have undergone CABG, thus reducing the risk and need for invasive arterial sampling.
用于评估急症患者的动脉血采样可能会导致血栓形成和栓塞等并发症。然而,它可以被静脉血采样所取代,但关于这方面的信息却很匮乏。
评估接受择期冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的患者动脉血气分析与中心静脉血气分析之间的相关性和一致性。
在这项横断面研究中,招募了100例接受择期CABG手术的重症监护病房(ICU)患者。分别从每位患者的动脉和中心静脉置管获取2mm的动脉血样和2mm的静脉血样。为了基于中心静脉血气(VBG)值预测动脉血气(ABG)值,采用线性回归分析,并使用Bland-Altman方法评估它们的一致性。
总共获取了200份样本。年龄的平均值和标准差分别为58.9±9.1岁,51%的参与者为女性。在pH值、二氧化碳分压(PCO)、碳酸氢盐(HCO)和碱剩余(BE)方面,ABG值与中心VBG值之间存在很强的相关性(r分别为0.73、0.74、0.67和0.71;p<0.001);然而,动脉血氧分压(PO)和血氧饱和度(SO)与静脉血氧分压和血氧饱和度之间的相关性为中等(r分别为0.29,p=0.005和r=0.27,p=0.006)。Bland-Altman分析显示所有变量之间具有极好的一致性(p<0.001)。
在测量准确的PO状态时,中心VBG分析不能替代ABG分析,在某些情况下需要进行动脉采样,但考虑到脉搏血氧饱和度测量在确定准确PO状态方面的准确性,对于其余指标,可以使用中心VBG而非ABG来确定患者的酸碱状态。特别是对于长期住院且留置中心静脉导管的患者,如接受CABG手术的患者,这样可以降低侵入性动脉采样的风险和需求。