Neuroradiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico "Carlo Besta", Milan, Italy.
Postgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
J Immunol Res. 2017;2017:5813951. doi: 10.1155/2017/5813951. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
Pseudophenomena, that is, imaging alterations due to therapy rather than tumor evolution, have an important impact on the management of glioma patients and the results of clinical trials. RANO (response assessment in neurooncology) criteria, including conventional MRI (cMRI), addressed the issues of pseudoprogression after radiotherapy and concomitant chemotherapy and pseudoresponse during antiangiogenic therapy of glioblastomas (GBM) and other gliomas. The development of cancer immunotherapy forced the identification of further relevant response criteria, summarized by the iRANO working group in 2015. In spite of this, the unequivocal definition of glioma progression by cMRI remains difficult particularly in the setting of immunotherapy approaches provided by checkpoint inhibitors and dendritic cells. Advanced MRI (aMRI) may in principle address this unmet clinical need. Here, we discuss the potential contribution of different aMRI techniques and their indications and pitfalls in relation to biological and imaging features of glioma and immune system interactions.
假性现象,即由于治疗而非肿瘤演变引起的影像学改变,对胶质瘤患者的治疗管理和临床试验结果有重要影响。 RANO(神经肿瘤学反应评估)标准,包括常规 MRI(cMRI),解决了放疗和同时化疗后的假性进展以及抗血管生成治疗胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)和其他胶质瘤的假性反应问题。癌症免疫疗法的发展迫使人们确定了进一步相关的反应标准,这些标准由 iRANO 工作组于 2015 年总结。尽管如此,通过 cMRI 明确界定胶质瘤进展仍然很困难,特别是在使用检查点抑制剂和树突细胞提供的免疫疗法方法的情况下。高级 MRI(aMRI)原则上可以满足这一未满足的临床需求。在这里,我们讨论了不同的 aMRI 技术及其适应症和陷阱在与胶质瘤的生物学和影像学特征以及免疫系统相互作用方面的潜在贡献。