• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

死胎后妊娠的医疗保健利用、引产和剖宫产:一项前瞻性研究。

Healthcare utilisation, induced labour and caesarean section in the pregnancy after stillbirth: a prospective study.

机构信息

Department of Behavioural Sciences in Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Department of Haematology, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

BJOG. 2018 Jan;125(2):202-210. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14750. Epub 2017 Jul 14.

DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.14750
PMID:28516500
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate healthcare utilisation, induced labour and caesarean section (CS) in the pregnancy after stillbirth and assess anxiety and dread of childbirth as mediators for these outcomes.

DESIGN

Population-based pregnancy cohort study.

SETTING

The Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study.

SAMPLE

A total of 901 pregnant women; 174 pregnant after stillbirth, 362 pregnant after live birth and 365 previously nulliparous.

METHODS

Data from questionnaires answered in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy and information from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Self-reported assessment of antenatal care, register-based assessment of onset and mode of delivery.

RESULTS

Women with a previous stillbirth had more frequent antenatal visits (mean 10.0; 95% CI 9.4-10.7) compared with women with a previous live birth (mean 6.0; 95% CI 5.8-6.2) and previously nulliparous women (mean 6.3; 95% CI 6.1-6.6). Induced labour and CS, elective and emergency, were also more prevalent in the stillbirth group. The adjusted odds ratio for elective CS was 2.5 (95% CI 1.3-5.0) compared with women with previous live birth and 3.7 (1.8-7.6) compared with previously nulliparous women. Anxiety was a minor mediator for the association between stillbirth and frequency of antenatal visits, whereas dread of childbirth was not a significant mediator for elective CS.

CONCLUSIONS

Women pregnant after stillbirth were more ample users of healthcare services and more often had induced labour and CS. The higher frequency of antenatal visits and elective CS could not be accounted for by anxiety or dread of childbirth.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Women pregnant after stillbirth are ample users of healthcare services and interventions during childbirth.

摘要

目的

调查胎死宫内后妊娠的医疗保健利用、引产和剖宫产(CS)情况,并评估分娩焦虑和恐惧是否为这些结局的中介因素。

设计

基于人群的妊娠队列研究。

设置

挪威母婴队列研究。

样本

共 901 名孕妇;174 名孕妇曾有过胎死宫内,362 名孕妇曾有过活产,365 名孕妇曾为初产妇。

方法

在妊娠第 2 和第 3 个三个月期间通过问卷收集数据,并从挪威医学出生登记处获取信息。

主要观察指标

产前护理的自我评估,分娩方式的登记评估。

结果

与有先前活产的孕妇(均值 6.0;95%CI 5.8-6.2)和先前初产妇(均值 6.3;95%CI 6.1-6.6)相比,有先前胎死宫内的孕妇产前检查更频繁(均值 10.0;95%CI 9.4-10.7)。引产和 CS,选择性和紧急性,在胎死宫内组中也更为常见。与先前有活产的孕妇相比,选择性 CS 的调整比值比为 2.5(95%CI 1.3-5.0),与先前初产妇相比为 3.7(1.8-7.6)。焦虑是胎死宫内与产前检查频率之间关联的次要中介因素,而对分娩的恐惧不是选择性 CS 的显著中介因素。

结论

胎死宫内后妊娠的孕妇更充分地利用医疗保健服务,更常进行引产和 CS。产前检查和选择性 CS 的更高频率不能用焦虑或对分娩的恐惧来解释。

推文摘要

胎死宫内后妊娠的女性会更充分地利用医疗保健服务,并在分娩时更常接受干预措施。

相似文献

1
Healthcare utilisation, induced labour and caesarean section in the pregnancy after stillbirth: a prospective study.死胎后妊娠的医疗保健利用、引产和剖宫产:一项前瞻性研究。
BJOG. 2018 Jan;125(2):202-210. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14750. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
2
Anxiety, depression and relationship satisfaction in the pregnancy following stillbirth and after the birth of a live-born baby: a prospective study.死产儿后和活产儿后孕妇的焦虑、抑郁和关系满意度:一项前瞻性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jan 24;18(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1666-8.
3
Risk of stillbirth after a previous caesarean delivery: A Swedish nationwide cohort study.前次剖宫产术后的死产风险:一项瑞典全国队列研究。
BJOG. 2024 Jul;131(8):1054-1061. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17760. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
4
Sexual violence and mode of delivery: a population-based cohort study.性暴力与分娩方式:一项基于人群的队列研究。
BJOG. 2014 Sep;121(10):1237-44. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12923. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
5
Variation in hospital caesarean section rates and obstetric outcomes among nulliparae at term: a population-based cohort study.足月初产妇剖宫产率及产科结局的差异:一项基于人群的队列研究。
BJOG. 2015 Apr;122(5):702-11. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13281. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
6
Obstetric consequences of subfertility: a retrospective cohort study.不孕的产科结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
BJOG. 2016 Jul;123(8):1320-8. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13584. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
7
Deciding on the mode of birth after a previous caesarean section - An online survey investigating women's preferences in Western Switzerland.既往剖宫产术后分娩方式的选择——一项调查瑞士西部女性偏好的在线调查
Midwifery. 2017 Jul;50:219-227. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
8
Induction of labour versus expectant management for nulliparous women over 35 years of age: a multi-centre prospective, randomised controlled trial.多中心前瞻性随机对照试验:对 35 岁以上初产妇引产与期待管理的比较。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Dec 11;12:145. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-145.
9
Outcomes of elective labour induction and elective caesarean section in low-risk pregnancies between 37 and 41 weeks' gestation.孕37至41周低风险妊娠的择期引产和择期剖宫产结局。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009 Dec;31(12):1124-30. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)34372-9.
10
Labour outcomes in caseload midwifery and standard care: a register-based cohort study.产程助产和标准护理的分娩结局:基于登记的队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Dec 6;18(1):481. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2090-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating patient experience to improve care in a specialist antenatal clinic for pregnancy after loss.评估患者体验,以改善妊娠丢失专科产前门诊的护理。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jan 10;24(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06217-w.
2
Impact of Perinatal Death on the Social and Family Context of the Parents.围生儿死亡对父母社会和家庭环境的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 14;17(10):3421. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103421.
3
Research priorities and potential methodologies to inform care in subsequent pregnancies following stillbirth: a web-based survey of healthcare professionals, researchers and advocates.
在胎儿死亡后妊娠的护理中确定优先研究事项和潜在方法:一项基于网络的医疗保健专业人员、研究人员和倡导者调查。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 22;9(6):e028735. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028735.