• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者参与系统性硬化症患者报告结局量表的开发

Patient participation in patient-reported outcome instrument development in systemic sclerosis.

作者信息

Pauling John D, Frech Tracy M, Domsic Robyn T, Hudson Marie

机构信息

Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Bath; and Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, UK.

University of Utah and Salt Lake Regional Veterans Affair Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

出版信息

Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017 Sep-Oct;35 Suppl 106(4):184-192. Epub 2017 May 2.

PMID:28516884
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The patient perspective captured using Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) instruments provide insight into the patient condition not always captured by physician-derived assessment tools. Target patient population involvement is an essential component of PRO instrument development. We have reviewed the level of patient involvement in the development of PRO instruments used in the assessment of systemic sclerosis (SSc).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was undertaken to identify studies reporting PRO instruments in SSc. Studies were assessed to establish whether the PRO instruments had been developed specifically for SSc or adopted from other disease areas. Studies reporting PRO instruments specific for SSc were scrutinised for evidence of target patient population involvement in the development of the instrument.

RESULTS

A total of 58 PRO instruments that have been used in SSc research were identified. Twelve (21%) of these were developed specifically for outcome assessment within SSc populations. Of these, 5 (42%) had not reported any patient involvement in the development phase of the instrument. Five SSc PRO instruments (42%) involved target patient population in the domain/item generation stage. Four (33%) of SSc PRO instruments had undertaken cognitive interviewing to ensure item wording adequately captured the intended conceptual framework.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of PRO instruments used to assess SSc have not involved significant target patient involvement in their development. By involving patients in the development of novel PRO instruments in SSc, we can ensure such instruments adequately capture the experiences most relevant to our patients.

摘要

目的

使用患者报告结局(PRO)工具所获取的患者视角,能为医师评估工具不一定能捕捉到的患者状况提供见解。目标患者群体的参与是PRO工具开发的重要组成部分。我们回顾了系统性硬化症(SSc)评估中使用的PRO工具开发过程中患者的参与程度。

方法

进行全面的文献综述,以确定报告SSc中PRO工具的研究。评估这些研究,以确定PRO工具是否专门为SSc开发或从其他疾病领域采用。对报告专门针对SSc的PRO工具的研究进行审查,以寻找目标患者群体参与该工具开发的证据。

结果

共确定了58种在SSc研究中使用的PRO工具。其中12种(21%)是专门为SSc人群的结局评估而开发的。在这些工具中,5种(42%)未报告在工具开发阶段有任何患者参与。5种SSc的PRO工具(42%)在领域/条目生成阶段让目标患者群体参与。4种(33%)SSc的PRO工具进行了认知访谈,以确保条目措辞能充分体现预期的概念框架。

结论

用于评估SSc的大多数PRO工具在开发过程中并未让目标患者群体大量参与。通过让患者参与SSc新型PRO工具的开发,我们可以确保此类工具能充分捕捉与患者最相关的经历。

相似文献

1
Patient participation in patient-reported outcome instrument development in systemic sclerosis.患者参与系统性硬化症患者报告结局量表的开发
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017 Sep-Oct;35 Suppl 106(4):184-192. Epub 2017 May 2.
2
Development and validation of a patient-reported outcome instrument for skin involvement in patients with systemic sclerosis.开发和验证一种用于系统性硬化症患者皮肤受累的患者报告结局量表。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Aug;76(8):1374-1380. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210534. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
3
Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure to assess activities and participation in people with systemic sclerosis: the Cochin 17-item Scleroderma Functional scale.开发一种新的患者报告结局指标,以评估系统性硬化症患者的活动和参与情况:科钦17项硬皮病功能量表。
Br J Dermatol. 2020 Oct;183(4):710-718. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18922. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
4
Systematic review of systemic sclerosis-specific instruments for the EULAR Outcome Measures Library: An evolutional database model of validated patient-reported outcomes.EULAR 结局测量库中系统性硬化症专用工具的系统评价:经过验证的患者报告结局的演化数据库模型
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2017 Apr;46(5):609-614. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
5
Development and validation of a patient-reported outcome in systemic sclerosis: the Hand scleroDerma lived Experience (HAnDE) scale.系统性硬化症患者报告结局的开发与验证:手部硬皮病生活体验(HAnDE)量表
Br J Dermatol. 2022 Jan;186(1):96-105. doi: 10.1111/bjd.20688. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
6
Use of existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments and their modification: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Evaluating and Documenting Content Validity for the Use of Existing Instruments and Their Modification PRO Task Force Report.使用现有患者报告结局(PRO)工具及其修改版:ISPOR 现有工具使用及其修改版的内容效度评估和文件记录的良好研究实践 PRO 工作组报告。
Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1075-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00603.x. Epub 2009 Sep 25.
7
Development and early qualitative evidence of two novel patient-reported outcome instruments to assess daily functioning in people with early-stage Parkinson's.开发并初步验证两种新型患者报告结局工具,以评估早期帕金森病患者的日常功能。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 Apr 20;7(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00577-9.
8
Humanistic and cost burden of systemic sclerosis: A review of the literature.系统性硬化症的人文和经济负担:文献综述。
Autoimmun Rev. 2017 Nov;16(11):1147-1154. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Sep 9.
9
Development of a Symptom-Based Patient-Reported Outcome Instrument for Functional Dyspepsia: A Preliminary Conceptual Model and an Evaluation of the Adequacy of Existing Instruments.一种基于症状的功能性消化不良患者报告结局工具的开发:初步概念模型及对现有工具充分性的评估
Patient. 2016 Oct;9(5):409-18. doi: 10.1007/s40271-016-0164-1.
10
Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: part 1--eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument.内容效度——在新开发的用于医疗产品评估的患者报告结局(PRO)工具中建立和报告证据:ISPOR PRO 良好研究实践工作组报告:第 1 部分——为新 PRO 工具征集概念。
Value Health. 2011 Dec;14(8):967-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.014. Epub 2011 Oct 13.

引用本文的文献

1
The assessment of psychological well-being in systemic sclerosis: a clinimetric validation.系统性硬化症中心理幸福感的评估:临床计量学验证
BMC Psychol. 2025 May 12;13(1):498. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02820-y.
2
EULAR recommendations for the involvement of patient research partners in rheumatology research: 2023 update.EULAR 关于患者研究伙伴参与风湿病学研究的建议:2023 年更新版。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2024 Oct 21;83(11):1443-1453. doi: 10.1136/ard-2024-225566.
3
Patient research partner involvement in rheumatology research: a systematic literature review informing the 2023 updated EULAR recommendations for the involvement of patient research partners.
患者研究伙伴参与风湿病学研究:系统文献回顾为 2023 年更新的 EULAR 患者研究伙伴参与建议提供信息。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2024 Sep 30;83(10):1268-1277. doi: 10.1136/ard-2024-225567.
4
Patient-reported outcome instruments in clinical trials of systemic sclerosis.系统性硬化症临床试验中的患者报告结局指标
J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2020 Jun;5(2):90-102. doi: 10.1177/2397198319886496. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
5
Domains and outcome measures for the assessment of limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis: an international collaborative scoping review.局限性皮肤系统性硬化症评估的领域和指标:一项国际协作范围综述。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 Aug 3;61(8):3132-3148. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac049.
6
Considerations for a combined index for limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis to support drug development and improve outcomes.用于局限性皮肤型系统性硬化症的综合指数的考量,以支持药物研发并改善治疗结果。
J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2021 Feb 1;6(1):66-76. doi: 10.1177/2397198320961967. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
7
Review of local wound management for scleroderma-associated digital ulcers.硬皮病相关指端溃疡的局部伤口处理综述
J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2018 Feb;3(1):66-70. doi: 10.5301/jsrd.5000268. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
8
Psychometric validation of the Hand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis-Digital Ulcers (HDISS-DU®) patient-reported outcome instrument.系统性硬化症-指端溃疡患者报告结局测定尺(HDISS-DU®)的心理测量学验证。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 Jan 6;22(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-2087-4.
9
An Interim Report of the Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium Working Groups.硬皮病临床试验联盟工作组中期报告
J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2019 Feb;4(1):17-27. doi: 10.1177/2397198318783926. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
10
Systemic sclerosis: state of the art on clinical practice guidelines.系统性硬化症:临床实践指南的最新进展
RMD Open. 2018 Oct 18;4(Suppl 1):e000782. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000782. eCollection 2018.