• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

残忍的善良:导致利他努力恶化他人情绪的因素。

Cruel to Be Kind: Factors Underlying Altruistic Efforts to Worsen Another Person's Mood.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Plymouth.

出版信息

Psychol Sci. 2017 Jul;28(7):862-871. doi: 10.1177/0956797617696312. Epub 2017 May 18.

DOI:10.1177/0956797617696312
PMID:28517967
Abstract

When aiming to improve another person's long-term well-being, people may choose to induce a negative emotion in that person in the short term. We labeled this form of agent-target interpersonal emotion regulation altruistic affect worsening and hypothesized that it may happen when three conditions are met: (a) The agent experiences empathic concern for the target of the affect-worsening process, (b) the negative emotion to be induced helps the target achieve a goal (e.g., anger for confrontation or fear for avoidance), and (c) there is no benefit for the agent. This hypothesis was tested by manipulating perspective-taking instructions and the goal to be achieved while participants ( N = 140) played a computer-based video game. Participants following other-oriented perspective-taking instructions, compared with those following objective perspective-taking instructions, decided to induce more anger in a supposed fellow participant who was working to achieve a confrontation goal and to induce more fear in a supposed fellow participant who was working to achieve an avoidance goal.

摘要

当旨在提高他人的长期幸福感时,人们可能会选择在短期内引起该人的负面情绪。我们将这种形式的主体-目标人际情绪调节称为利他性情感恶化,并假设当满足以下三个条件时,就会发生这种情况:(a)主体对情感恶化过程的目标对象产生共情关怀;(b)要引起的负面情绪有助于目标实现目标(例如,愤怒以对抗或恐惧以避免);(c)主体没有受益。通过操纵换位思考指令和要实现的目标,参与者(N=140)玩基于计算机的视频游戏来检验此假设。与采取客观视角的参与者相比,遵循他人导向的换位思考指令的参与者决定在努力实现对抗目标的假定同伴参与者身上引起更多的愤怒,并在努力实现回避目标的假定同伴参与者身上引起更多的恐惧。

相似文献

1
Cruel to Be Kind: Factors Underlying Altruistic Efforts to Worsen Another Person's Mood.残忍的善良:导致利他努力恶化他人情绪的因素。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Jul;28(7):862-871. doi: 10.1177/0956797617696312. Epub 2017 May 18.
2
Digital altruists: Resolving key questions about the empathy-altruism hypothesis in an Internet sample.数字利他主义者:在互联网样本中解决同理心利他主义假说的关键问题。
Emotion. 2018 Jun;18(4):493-506. doi: 10.1037/emo0000375. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
3
Is Empathy the Default Response to Suffering? A Meta-Analytic Evaluation of Perspective Taking's Effect on Empathic Concern.同理心是否是对痛苦的默认反应?换位思考对同理心关怀影响的元分析评价。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2020 May;24(2):141-162. doi: 10.1177/1088868319887599. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
4
Implications of emotion regulation strategies for empathic concern, social attitudes, and helping behavior.情绪调节策略对共情关注、社会态度和帮助行为的影响。
Emotion. 2015 Apr;15(2):187-94. doi: 10.1037/a0038820. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
5
I know how you feel: the warm-altruistic personality profile and the empathic brain.我了解你的感受:温暖利他型人格特征与共情大脑。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 13;10(3):e0120639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120639. eCollection 2015.
6
The effects of cognitive and affective perspective taking on empathic concern and altruistic helping.认知和情感观点采择对共情关注和利他帮助的影响。
J Soc Psychol. 1996 Oct;136(5):613-23. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1996.9714045.
7
Empathic emotion regulation in prosocial behaviour and altruism.同理心情绪调节在亲社会行为和利他主义中的作用。
Cogn Emot. 2020 Dec;34(8):1532-1548. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2020.1783517. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
8
Associations between empathy and altruistic sharing behavior in Chinese adults.中国人的同理心与利他主义分享行为之间的关联。
J Gen Psychol. 2019 Jan-Mar;146(1):1-16. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2018.1510826.
9
Choosing to be afraid: preferences for fear as a function of goal pursuit.选择感到恐惧:作为目标追求函数的对恐惧的偏好。
Emotion. 2009 Aug;9(4):488-97. doi: 10.1037/a0015882.
10
Does empathy trigger only altruistic motivation? How about selflessness or justice?同理心只会引发利他动机吗?那无私或正义呢?
Emotion. 2008 Dec;8(6):766-74. doi: 10.1037/a0013967.

引用本文的文献

1
How Do Victimized Youth Emotionally and Socially Appraise Common Ways Third-Party Peers Intervene?受害青年如何从情感和社交角度评价第三方同龄人常见的干预方式?
J Child Fam Stud. 2022 Nov;31(11):3152-3166. doi: 10.1007/s10826-022-02285-2. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
2
Cognitive Reappraisal and Expressive Suppression Evoke Distinct Neural Connections during Interpersonal Emotion Regulation.认知重评和表达抑制在人际情绪调节中引发不同的神经连接。
J Neurosci. 2023 Dec 6;43(49):8456-8471. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0954-23.2023.
3
Believe, express, and enjoy: utility beliefs about social emotion expression consistently predict satisfactory outcomes.
相信、表达并享受:关于社会情感表达的实用信念始终能预测出令人满意的结果。
Motiv Emot. 2023;47(3):399-411. doi: 10.1007/s11031-023-10009-2. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
4
Couples' extrinsic emotion regulation and dyadic adjustment: an actor-partner interdependence model analysis.夫妻的外在情绪调节与二元调适:一种行为者-伙伴相互依赖模型分析
Curr Psychol. 2022 Dec 26:1-15. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-04188-3.
5
Emotional interdependence: the key to studying extrinsic emotion regulation.情感相互依赖:研究外在情绪调节的关键
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2022 Nov 4;35(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s41155-022-00237-9.
6
The link between cognitive and affective empathy and interpersonal emotion regulation direction and strategies.认知共情和情感共情与人际情绪调节方向和策略之间的联系。
Scand J Psychol. 2022 Dec;63(6):594-600. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12847. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
7
Third-Party Intervention in Peer Victimization: Self-Evaluative Emotions and Appraisals of a Diverse Adolescent Sample.同伴受害中的第三方干预:不同青少年样本的自我评估情绪与评价
J Res Adolesc. 2020 Sep;30(3):633-650. doi: 10.1111/jora.12548. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
8
Emotion Goals: What Do Sexual Offenders Want to Feel?情感目标:性犯罪者想要感受什么?
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2019 Nov-Dec;63(15-16):2611-2629. doi: 10.1177/0306624X19866114. Epub 2019 Jul 31.