Frey Karin S, Strong Zoe Higheagle, Onyewuenyi Adaurennaya C, Pearson Cynthia R, Eagan Brendan R
University of Washington.
Washington State University.
J Res Adolesc. 2020 Sep;30(3):633-650. doi: 10.1111/jora.12548. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
African American, European American, Mexican American, and Native American adolescents (N = 270) described how they felt and appraised their own actions in response to a peer's victimization. Analyses compared times they had calmed victim emotions, amplified anger, avenged, and resolved conflicts peacefully. Adolescents felt prouder, more helpful, more like a good friend, and expected more peer approval after calming and resolving than after amplifying anger or avenging peers. They also felt less guilt and shame after calming and resolving. Avenging elicited more positive self-evaluation than amplifying. Epistemic network analyses explored links between self-evaluative and other emotions. Pride was linked to relief after efforts to calm or resolve. Third-party revenge reflected its antisocial and prosocial nature with connections between pride, relief, anger, and guilt.
非裔美国、欧裔美国、墨西哥裔美国和美国原住民青少年（N = 270）描述了他们在面对同伴受欺负时的感受以及对自己行为的评价。分析比较了他们安抚受害者情绪、加剧愤怒、复仇以及和平解决冲突的次数。与加剧愤怒或为同伴复仇相比，青少年在安抚和解决问题后会感到更自豪、更乐于助人、更像一个好朋友，并且期望得到更多同伴的认可。他们在安抚和解决问题后也会感到更少的内疚和羞耻。复仇比加剧愤怒引发了更多积极的自我评价。认知网络分析探索了自我评估情绪与其他情绪之间的联系。自豪与在努力安抚或解决问题后的轻松感有关。第三方复仇通过自豪、轻松、愤怒和内疚之间的联系反映了其反社会和亲社会的性质。
