Gray Muir, Lagerberg Tyra, Dombrádi Viktor
a Department of Primary Care , University of Oxford , Oxford , UK.
b Better Value Healthcare Ltd. , Oxford , United Kingdom.
New Bioeth. 2017 Apr;23(1):87-94. doi: 10.1080/20502877.2017.1314891.
Precision medicine carries huge potential in the treatment of many diseases, particularly those with high-penetrance monogenic underpinnings. However, precision medicine through genomic technologies also has ethical implications. We will define allocative, personal, and technical value ('triple value') in healthcare and how this relates to equity. Equity is here taken to be implicit in the concept of triple value in countries that have publicly funded healthcare systems. It will be argued that precision medicine risks concentrating resources to those that already experience greater access to healthcare and power in society, nationally as well as globally. Healthcare payers, clinicians, and patients must all be involved in optimising the potential of precision medicine, without reducing equity. Throughout, the discussion will refer to the NHS RightCare Programme, which is a national initiative aiming to improve value and equity in the context of NHS England.
精准医学在许多疾病的治疗中具有巨大潜力,尤其是那些由高外显率单基因因素导致的疾病。然而,通过基因组技术实现的精准医学也存在伦理问题。我们将界定医疗保健中的分配价值、个人价值和技术价值(“三重价值”),以及这与公平性的关系。在拥有公共资助医疗体系的国家,公平性被视为隐含在三重价值概念之中。有人认为,精准医学有可能将资源集中于那些在国家乃至全球范围内已经在社会中享有更多医疗保健机会和权力的人手中。医疗保健支付方、临床医生和患者都必须参与到优化精准医学潜力的过程中,同时又不降低公平性。在整个讨论过程中,将提及英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的“正确医疗计划”,这是一项旨在在英格兰NHS背景下提高价值和公平性的全国性倡议。