Gordon Shirley, Goren Chen, Carmon Erez, Shelef Leah
Israeli Air Force and IDF Medical Corps, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2017 Apr 1;88(4):392-398. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.4677.2017.
In aviation psychology, there is a constant need for the cognitive evaluation of pilots as part of operational fitness and safety criteria.
A cross-sectional study with comparison between the performance of Israeli Air Force pilot cadets (N = 318) and U.S. Air Force pilot training candidates (N = 512) as assessed by a cognitive battery was undertaken. The data of the comparison group was collected from Callister, King, and Retzlaff, as published in 1996.
In general, the means in the three components composing the battery-speed, accuracy, and throughput variables-indicated that the Israeli Air Force pilot cadets' scores were higher than those of the U.S. Air Force pilot candidates' scores in 50 of 53 variables. Nonsignificant differences were found in Accuracy of shifting attention-arrow color (SATAC), pathfinder-combined (PFC), and pathfinder-letter (PFL).
The difference in performance between the two groups may be due to differences in population characteristics. However, these results need to be considered cautiously, as the groups were sampled at a sizeable time gap (1996 for the U.S. Air Force vs. 2013 for the Israeli Air Force), with each time period characterized by different cultural and technological influences.Gordon S, Goren C, Carmon E, Shelef L. Cognitive evaluation of Israeli Air Force pilot cadets. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2017; 88(4):392-398.
在航空心理学中,作为操作适应性和安全标准的一部分,持续需要对飞行员进行认知评估。
进行了一项横断面研究,对以色列空军飞行学员(N = 318)和美国空军飞行员培训候选人(N = 512)的表现进行比较,通过一套认知测试进行评估。对照组的数据来自1996年发表的卡利斯特、金和雷茨拉夫的研究。
总体而言,构成测试的三个组成部分——速度、准确性和吞吐量变量——的均值表明,在53个变量中的50个变量上,以色列空军飞行学员的得分高于美国空军飞行员候选人的得分。在注意力转移的准确性——箭头颜色(SATAC)、寻路者——综合(PFC)和寻路者——字母(PFL)方面未发现显著差异。
两组之间表现的差异可能归因于人群特征的差异。然而,这些结果需要谨慎考虑,因为两组是在相当长的时间间隔内抽样的(美国空军为1996年,以色列空军为2013年),每个时间段都有不同的文化和技术影响。戈登·S、戈伦·C、卡蒙·E、谢莱夫·L。以色列空军飞行学员的认知评估。航空航天医学与人类表现。2017;88(4):392 - 398。