Suppr超能文献

水上骑行——我们了解什么?一项关于头部露出水面的水上骑行的范围综述。

Aquatic cycling-What do we know? A scoping review on head-out aquatic cycling.

作者信息

Rewald Stefanie, Mesters Ilse, Lenssen Antoine F, Bansi Jens, Lambeck Johan, de Bie Rob A, Waller Benjamin

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Department of Physical Therapy, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 May 16;12(5):e0177704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177704. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Over the past few years, aquatic cycling has become a trending fitness activity. However, the literature has not been reviewed exhaustively. Therefore, using scoping review methodology, the aim of this review was to explore the current state of the literature concerning aquatic cycling. This study specifically focused on study designs, populations and outcomes. A comprehensive search of seven databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Cinahl, Embase, PEDro,Web of Science, WorldCat) was conducted up to 30th September 2016. GoogleScholar, World Cat, ResearchGate, specific aquatic therapy websites and aquatic therapy journals were searched to identify additional literature. Full-text publications in English, German or Dutch were included. Studies were included when the intervention involved head-out cycling carried out in 10° to 35° Celsius water. Exclusion criteria were the use of wet suits or confounding interventions that would affect participants' homeostasis. 63 articles were included and the study parameters of these studies were summarized. Using three grouping themes, included studies were categorised as 1) single session tests comparing aquatic versus land cycling, or 2) aquatic cycling only sessions investigating different exercise conditions and 3) aquatic cycling intervention programmes. Although the experimental conditions differed noticeably across the studies, shared characteristics were identified. Cardiovascular parameters were investigated by many of the studies with the results suggesting that the cardiac demand of aquatic cycling seems similar to land-based cycling. Only six studies evaluated the effect of aquatic cycling interventions. Therefore, future research should investigate the effects of aquatic cycling interventions, preferably in individuals that are expected to gain health benefits from aquatic cycling. Moreover, this comprehensive outline of available literature could serve as a starting point for systematic reviews or clinical studies on the effects of aquatic cycling on the cardiovascular responses.

摘要

在过去几年中,水上骑行已成为一种热门的健身活动。然而,相关文献尚未得到详尽的综述。因此,本综述采用范围综述方法,旨在探究有关水上骑行的文献现状。本研究特别关注研究设计、研究对象和研究结果。截至2016年9月30日,对七个数据库(PubMed、MEDLINE、CINAHL、Embase、PEDro、科学网、世界cat)进行了全面检索。还检索了谷歌学术、世界cat、ResearchGate、特定的水上治疗网站和水上治疗期刊,以查找其他文献。纳入了英文、德文或荷兰文的全文出版物。当干预措施包括在10摄氏度至35摄氏度的水中进行头部露出式骑行时,相关研究被纳入。排除标准为使用潜水衣或会影响参与者体内平衡的混杂干预措施。共纳入63篇文章,并总结了这些研究的参数。利用三个分组主题,将纳入的研究分为1)比较水上骑行与陆地骑行的单次测试,或2)仅研究不同运动条件的水上骑行课程,以及3)水上骑行干预项目。尽管各项研究的实验条件差异显著,但仍发现了共同特征。许多研究调查了心血管参数,结果表明水上骑行对心脏的需求似乎与陆地骑行相似。只有六项研究评估了水上骑行干预的效果。因此,未来的研究应调查水上骑行干预的效果,最好针对预期能从水上骑行中获得健康益处的个体。此外,这份现有文献的全面概述可作为关于水上骑行对心血管反应影响的系统综述或临床研究的起点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验