Research Unit for General Practice and Section for General Medical Practice, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Section for Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 May 23;69(20):2488-2497. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.558.
Obesity is repeatedly emphasized as a risk factor for atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF). However, the underlying evidence may be questioned, as the obvious correlations between various anthropometric measures hamper identification of the characteristics that are biologically driving AF risk, and recent studies suggest that fat carries limited or no independent risk of AF.
This study sought to assess mutually adjusted associations among AF risk and height, weight, body mass index, hip and waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and bioelectrical impedance-derived measures of fat mass, lean body mass, and fat percentage.
Anthropometric measures and self-reported life-style information were collected from 1993 to 1997 in a population-based cohort including 55,273 persons age 50 to 64 years who were followed in Danish registers until June 2013.
During a median of 17 years of follow-up, 3,868 persons developed AF. Adjusted hazard ratios per population SD difference (HRs) showed highly statistically significant, positive associations for all 9 anthropometric measures (HRs ranging from 1.08 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05 to 1.12] for waist-to-hip ratio to 1.37 [95% CI: 1.33 to 1.42] for lean body mass). Pairwise mutual adjustment of the 9 measures left the association for lean body mass virtually unchanged (lowest HR: 1.33 [95% CI: 1.28 to 1.39] when adjusting for height), whereas no other association remained substantial when adjusted for lean body mass (highest HR: 1.05 [95% CI: 1.01 to 1.10] for height).
Lean body mass was the predominant anthropometric risk factor for AF, whereas no association was observed for either of the obesity-related anthropometric measures after adjustment for lean body mass.
肥胖被反复强调为心房颤动或扑动(AF)的危险因素。然而,由于各种人体测量指标之间存在明显的相关性,这使得确定导致 AF 风险的特征变得困难,并且最近的研究表明,脂肪对 AF 的风险几乎没有或没有独立的影响。
本研究旨在评估 AF 风险与身高、体重、体重指数、臀围和腰围、腰臀比以及生物电阻抗法测量的体脂量、去脂体重和体脂百分比之间相互调整的关联。
1993 年至 1997 年,在一个包括 55273 名年龄在 50 至 64 岁之间的人群基础队列中收集了人体测量指标和自我报告的生活方式信息,这些人在丹麦登记册中被随访至 2013 年 6 月。
在中位数为 17 年的随访期间,有 3868 人发生了 AF。每人群体标准差差异的调整后危害比(HRs)显示,所有 9 个人体测量指标均具有高度统计学显著的正相关关系(HRs 范围为 1.08 [95%置信区间(CI):1.05 至 1.12],对于腰臀比,1.37 [95%CI:1.33 至 1.42],对于去脂体重)。9 项指标的两两相互调整几乎使去脂体重的相关性保持不变(当调整为身高时,最低 HR:1.33 [95%CI:1.28 至 1.39]),而当调整为去脂体重时,其他任何关联均不再显著(最高 HR:1.05 [95%CI:1.01 至 1.10],对于身高)。
去脂体重是 AF 的主要人体测量危险因素,而在调整去脂体重后,肥胖相关人体测量指标与 AF 之间不存在关联。