Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Center for Quality and Productivity Improvement, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Health Care Manag Sci. 2018 Dec;21(4):475-491. doi: 10.1007/s10729-017-9404-8. Epub 2017 May 18.
To improve patient access to primary care, many healthcare organizations have introduced electronic visits (e-visits) to provide patient-physician communication through secure messages. However, it remains unclear how e-visit affects physicians' operations on a daily basis and whether it would increase physicians' panel size. In this study, we consider a primary care physician who has a steady patient panel and manages patients' office and e-visits, as well as other indirect care tasks. We use queueing-based performance outcomes to evaluate the performance of care delivery. The results suggest that improved operational efficiency is achieved only when the service time of e-visits is smaller enough to compensate the effectiveness loss due to online communications. A simple approximation formula of the relationship between e-visit service time and e-visit to office visit referral ratio is provided serving as a guideline for evaluating the performance of e-visit implementation. Furthermore, based on the analysis of the impact of e-visits on physician's capacity, we conclude that it is not the more e-visits the better, and the condition for maximal panel size is investigated. Finally, the expected outcomes of implementing e-visits at Dean East Clinic are discussed.
为了改善患者获得初级保健的机会,许多医疗机构已经引入了电子就诊(e-visit),通过安全信息为患者与医生提供沟通。然而,目前仍不清楚电子就诊会如何影响医生的日常运营,以及它是否会增加医生的患者人数。在这项研究中,我们考虑了一位拥有稳定患者群体的初级保健医生,他负责管理患者的门诊和电子就诊,以及其他间接护理任务。我们使用基于队列的绩效指标来评估护理交付的绩效。结果表明,只有当电子就诊的服务时间足够短,以弥补在线沟通带来的效率损失时,才能实现运营效率的提高。我们提供了一个简单的电子就诊服务时间与电子就诊转门诊就诊推荐比之间关系的近似公式,作为评估电子就诊实施绩效的指南。此外,基于对电子就诊对医生能力影响的分析,我们得出结论,并不是电子就诊越多越好,并且研究了最大患者人数的条件。最后,讨论了在 Dean East 诊所实施电子就诊的预期结果。