Pirela Sandra Vanessa, Martin John, Bello Dhimiter, Demokritou Philip
a Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health , Center for Nanotechnology and Nanotoxicology , Boston , MA , USA.
b Department of Public Health , UMass Lowell , Lowell , MA , USA.
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2017 Sep;47(8):678-704. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2017.1318354. Epub 2017 May 19.
Toner formulations used by laser printers (LP) and photocopiers (PC), collectively called "toner-based printing equipment" (TPE), are nano-enabled products (NEP) because they contain several engineered nanomaterials (ENM) that improve toner performance. It has been shown that during consumer use (printing), these ENM are released in the air, together with other semi-volatile organic nanoparticles, and newly formed gaseous co-pollutants such as volatile organic compounds (VOC). The aim of this review is to detail and analyze physico-chemical and morphological (PCM), as well as the toxicological properties of particulate matter (PM) emissions from TPE. The review covers evolution of science since the early 2000, when this printing technology first became a subject of public interest, as well as the lagging regulatory framework around it. Important studies that have significantly changed our understanding of these exposures are also highlighted. The review continues with a critical appraisal of the most up-to-date cellular, animal and human toxicological evidence on the potential adverse human health effects of PM emitted from TPE. We highlight several limitations of existing studies, including (i) use of high and often unrealistic doses in vitro or in vivo; (ii) unrealistically high-dose rates in intratracheal instillation studies; (iii) improper use of toners as surrogate for emitted nanoparticles; (iv) lack of or inadequate PCM characterization of exposures; and (v) lack of dosimetry considerations in in vitro studies. Presently, there is compelling evidence that the PM from TPE are biologically active and capable of inducing oxidative stress in vitro and in vivo, respiratory tract inflammation in vivo (in rats) and in humans, several endpoints of cellular injury in monocultures and co-cultures, including moderate epigenetic modifications in vitro. In humans, limited epidemiological studies report typically 2-3 times higher prevalence of chronic cough, wheezing, nasal blockage, excessive sputum production, breathing difficulties, and shortness of breath, in copier operators relative to controls. Such symptoms can be exacerbated during chronic exposures, and in individuals susceptible to inhaled pollutants. Thus respiratory, immunological, cardiovascular, and other disorders may be developed following such exposures; however, further toxicological and larger scale molecular epidemiological studies must be done to fully understand the mechanism of action of these TPE emitted nanoparticles. Major research gaps have also been identified. Among them, a methodical risk assessment based on "real world" exposures rather than on the toner particles alone needs to be performed to provide the much-needed data to establish regulatory guidelines protective of individuals exposed to TPE emissions at both the occupational and consumer level. Industry-wide molecular epidemiology as well as mechanistic animal and human studies are also urgently needed.
激光打印机(LP)和复印机(PC)所使用的调色剂配方,统称为“基于调色剂的打印设备”(TPE),属于纳米功能产品(NEP),因为它们含有多种工程纳米材料(ENM),这些材料可改善调色剂性能。研究表明,在消费者使用(打印)过程中,这些ENM会与其他半挥发性有机纳米颗粒以及新形成的气态共污染物(如挥发性有机化合物(VOC))一起释放到空气中。本综述的目的是详细阐述并分析TPE排放的颗粒物(PM)的物理化学和形态学(PCM)以及毒理学特性。该综述涵盖了自21世纪初这项打印技术首次成为公众关注的主题以来的科学发展历程,以及围绕它滞后的监管框架。还重点介绍了一些显著改变我们对这些暴露认识的重要研究。接着,本综述对有关TPE排放的PM对人类健康潜在不利影响的最新细胞、动物和人体毒理学证据进行了批判性评估。我们强调了现有研究的几个局限性,包括:(i)在体外或体内使用高剂量且往往不切实际的剂量;(ii)气管内滴注研究中的剂量率过高且不切实际;(iii)不恰当地使用调色剂作为排放纳米颗粒的替代物;(iv)对暴露的PCM表征缺乏或不充分;(v)体外研究中缺乏剂量测定考虑。目前,有令人信服的证据表明,TPE排放的PM具有生物活性,能够在体外和体内诱导氧化应激,在体内(大鼠)和人体中引发呼吸道炎症,在单培养和共培养中导致细胞损伤的多个终点,包括体外适度的表观遗传修饰。在人类中,有限的流行病学研究报告显示,与对照组相比,复印机操作员慢性咳嗽、喘息、鼻塞、痰液过多、呼吸困难和呼吸急促的患病率通常高出2至3倍。在长期暴露期间以及对吸入污染物敏感的个体中,这些症状可能会加重。因此,接触此类污染物后可能会引发呼吸、免疫、心血管和其他疾病;然而,必须进行进一步的毒理学和更大规模的分子流行病学研究,以充分了解这些TPE排放的纳米颗粒的作用机制。还确定了主要的研究差距。其中,需要基于“现实世界”暴露而非仅基于调色剂颗粒进行系统的风险评估,以提供急需的数据,从而制定保护职业和消费者层面接触TPE排放物的个人的监管指南。全行业的分子流行病学以及机制性动物和人体研究也迫切需要。