Kim Si-Hyun, Choi Jae-Ki, Cho Sung-Yeon, Lee Hyo-Jin, Park Sun Hee, Choi Su-Mi, Lee Dong-Gun, Choi Jung-Hyun, Yoo Jin-Hong, Lee Jong-Wook
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Vaccine Bio Research Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Med Mycol. 2018 Feb 1;56(2):197-206. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myx038.
Although yeast bloodstream infections (BSIs) are increasingly being reported in patients with hematological malignancies undergoing antifungal therapy, clinical information regarding breakthrough infections is scarce. The aim of this study was to determine the risk factors for and clinical outcomes of breakthrough yeast BSIs in patients with hematological malignancies in the era of newer antifungal agents. Between 2011 and 2014, all consecutive patients with hematological malignancies who developed yeast BSIs were included in a case-control study wherein breakthrough infections (cases) and de novo infections (controls) were compared. Of 49 patients with yeast BSIs, 21 (43%) met the criteria for breakthrough infections. The proportions of Candida krusei and Candida tropicalis in the cases and controls were significantly different (32% [7/22] vs. 3% [1/29], P = .015; 5% [1/22] vs. 38% [11/29], P = .007, respectively). Acute leukemia, presence of a central venous catheter and neutropenia in the 3 days prior to BSI were significant risk factors for breakthrough infections. Six-week mortality rates was 33% [7/21] in the cases and 43% [12/28] in the controls (P = .564). Refractory neutropenia and the Pitt bacteremia score were independent predictors of 6-week mortality. In conclusion, breakthrough infections accounted for a significant proportion of yeast BSIs in patients with hematological malignancies. However, these infections did not increase the risk of death by themselves. Our results suggest that current clinical management of breakthrough yeast BSIs, which includes switching to a different antifungal class and prompt catheter removal is reasonable.
尽管在接受抗真菌治疗的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者中,酵母血症(BSIs)的报告越来越多,但关于突破性感染的临床信息却很少。本研究的目的是确定在新型抗真菌药物时代,血液系统恶性肿瘤患者发生突破性酵母BSIs的危险因素和临床结局。在2011年至2014年期间,所有连续发生酵母BSIs的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者被纳入一项病例对照研究,比较突破性感染(病例)和新发感染(对照)。在49例酵母BSIs患者中,21例(43%)符合突破性感染标准。病例组和对照组中克鲁斯念珠菌和热带念珠菌的比例有显著差异(分别为32%[7/22]对3%[1/29],P = 0.015;5%[1/22]对38%[11/29],P = 0.007)。急性白血病、中心静脉导管的存在以及BSI前3天的中性粒细胞减少是突破性感染的重要危险因素。病例组6周死亡率为33%[7/21],对照组为43%[12/28](P = 0.564)。难治性中性粒细胞减少和皮特菌血症评分是6周死亡率的独立预测因素。总之,突破性感染在血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的酵母BSIs中占很大比例。然而,这些感染本身并没有增加死亡风险。我们的结果表明,目前对突破性酵母BSIs的临床管理,包括换用不同类别的抗真菌药物和及时拔除导管是合理的。