Belvederi Murri Martino, Mamberto Sara, Briatore Lucia, Mazzucchelli Chiara, Amore Mario, Cordera Renzo
Section of Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Italy; Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
J Affect Disord. 2017 Sep;219:64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.05.018. Epub 2017 May 11.
Diabetes and depression are reciprocally linked, but few studies modeled their interplay considering the influence of affective temperaments (AT) and demographic factors.
Participants with type 1 and type 2 diabetes (T1DM and T2DM, n=279) recruited from Diabetes Units were assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris and San Diego-autoquestionnaire version (TEMPS-A), Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS), Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS) and Cumulative Illness Rating Scales (CIRS). Glycosylated hemoglobin levels (HBA1C) was used as index of glycemic control. The bi-directional association between glycemic control, depression and candidate mediators was examined with Structural Equation Modeling, testing the impact of moderator variables (AT, diabetes type, age and gender) with multigroup comparison.
The association between HBA1C and depressive symptoms was mediated by diabetes-related distress,, while there was no definite evidence of depression influencing HBA1C through changes of adherence, tiredness, appetite, alcohol intake or smoking. Among individuals with AT, distress was unrelated to HBA1C and had a higher impact on depression; adherence was inversely association with HBA1C. Moreover, physical comorbidities impacted on depression. While diabetes type had a moderation role, age and gender did not affect the model.
Cross sectional design, lack of objective measures of diet and physical activity.
Glycemic control seem to influence the severity of depressive symptoms, but the reciprocal association seems non-significant. AT and diabetes type may shape this relationship influencing distress and adherence to medications. Findings may aid interventions aimed at improving patients' care and quality of life.
糖尿病与抑郁症相互关联,但很少有研究在考虑情感气质(AT)和人口统计学因素影响的情况下对它们之间的相互作用进行建模。
从糖尿病科室招募的1型和2型糖尿病患者(T1DM和T2DM,n = 279)接受了贝克抑郁量表(BDI)、孟菲斯、比萨、巴黎和圣地亚哥气质评估-自填问卷版(TEMPS-A)、莫里isky药物依从性量表(MMAS)、糖尿病痛苦量表(DDS)和累积疾病评定量表(CIRS)的评估。糖化血红蛋白水平(HBA1C)用作血糖控制指标。采用结构方程模型检验血糖控制、抑郁与候选中介因素之间的双向关联,并通过多组比较检验调节变量(AT、糖尿病类型、年龄和性别)的影响。
HBA1C与抑郁症状之间的关联由糖尿病相关痛苦介导,而没有明确证据表明抑郁通过依从性、疲劳、食欲、酒精摄入或吸烟的变化影响HBA1C。在有情感气质的个体中,痛苦与HBA1C无关,对抑郁的影响更大;依从性与HBA1C呈负相关。此外,躯体合并症对抑郁有影响。虽然糖尿病类型有调节作用,但年龄和性别不影响该模型。
横断面设计,缺乏饮食和身体活动的客观测量。
血糖控制似乎影响抑郁症状的严重程度,但这种相互关联似乎不显著。情感气质和糖尿病类型可能通过影响痛苦和药物依从性来塑造这种关系。研究结果可能有助于旨在改善患者护理和生活质量的干预措施。