Printz Trine, Sorensen Jesper Roed, Godballe Christian, Grøntved Ågot Møller
Department of ORL Head & Neck Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark; Clinical Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark.
Department of ORL Head & Neck Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark; Clinical Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark.
J Voice. 2018 Jan;32(1):32-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.03.019. Epub 2017 May 16.
The voice range profile (VRP) measures vocal intensity and fundamental frequency. Phonosurgical and logopedic treatment outcome studies using the VRP report voice improvements of 3-6 semitones (ST) in ST range and 4-7 decibels (dB) in sound pressure level range after treatment. These small improvements stress the importance of reliable measurements. The aim was to evaluate the test-retest reliability of the dual-microphone computerized VRP on participants with healthy voices.
This is a prospective test-retest reliability study.
Dual-microphone VRPs were repeated twice on healthy participants (n = 37) with an interval of 6-37 days. Voice frequency and intensity (minimum, maximum, and ranges) were assessed in combination with the area of the VRP.
Correlations between VRP parameters were high (r > 0.60). However, in the retest, a statistically significant increase in voice frequency range (1.4 ST [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.8-2.1 ST], P < 0.001), intensity ranges (2.2 dB [95% CI: 1.0-3.4 dB], P < 0.001), maximum frequency (1.0 ST [95% CI: 0.5-1.6 ST], P < 0.001), maximum intensity (1.4 dB [95% CI: 0.5-2.3 dB], P = 0.002), and area inside the VRP (148 cells [95% CI: 87-210 cells], P < 0.001) was observed.
The intra-examiner variation of the dual-microphone VRP is well below the differences seen after surgical or logopedic intervention, even when measuring in non-sound-treated rooms. There is a need for studies regarding inter-examiner reliability with a longer interval between test and retest before the assessment is fully reliable for clinical application.
嗓音音域图(VRP)可测量嗓音强度和基频。使用VRP的嗓音外科和言语治疗结果研究报告称,治疗后ST范围内嗓音提高3 - 6个半音(ST),声压级范围内提高4 - 7分贝(dB)。这些微小的改善凸显了可靠测量的重要性。本研究旨在评估双麦克风计算机化VRP在嗓音健康参与者中的重测信度。
这是一项前瞻性重测信度研究。
对37名嗓音健康的参与者重复进行两次双麦克风VRP测试,间隔时间为6 - 37天。结合VRP的面积评估嗓音频率和强度(最小值、最大值和范围)。
VRP参数之间的相关性很高(r > 0.60)。然而,在重测中,嗓音频率范围(1.4 ST [95%置信区间{CI}:0.8 - 2.1 ST],P < 0.001)、强度范围(2.2 dB [95% CI:1.0 - 3.4 dB],P < 0.001)、最大频率(1.0 ST [95% CI:0.5 - 1.6 ST],P < 0.001)、最大强度(1.4 dB [95% CI:0.5 - 2.3 dB],P = 0.002)以及VRP内的面积(148个单元格[95% CI:87 - 210个单元格])均有统计学显著增加(P < 0.001)。
即使在未进行隔音处理的房间中测量,双麦克风VRP的检查者内变异也远低于手术或言语治疗干预后的差异。在该评估完全可靠地应用于临床之前,需要进行关于检查者间信度的研究,且测试与重测之间的间隔时间要更长。