• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

法国贫困社区的社区园艺:重新思考食物实践的一种方式?

Community gardening in poor neighborhoods in France: A way to re-think food practices?

机构信息

Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, INRA, NORT, Marseille, France.

Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, TELEMMME, Aix-en-Provence, France.

出版信息

Appetite. 2017 Sep 1;116:589-598. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.023. Epub 2017 May 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.023
PMID:28527952
Abstract

Social inequalities in diet are attributed to sociocultural determinants, economic constraints, and unequal access to healthy food. Fruits and vegetables are lacking in the diets of disadvantaged populations. The objective was to test the hypothesis that, in poor neighborhoods, community gardeners will have larger supply of healthy food, especially fruit and vegetables, than non-gardeners. We examined community gardens from the perspective of production, economics and nutrition, and social and symbolic dimensions, through multidisciplinary investigations involving women with access to a community garden plot in a poor neighborhood of Marseille, France. Gardeners' monthly household food supplies (purchases and garden production) were analyzed and compared with those of women with a similar socio-economic profile living in the same neighborhoods, without access to a garden. Twenty-one gardeners participated. Only eleven of them harvested during the month of the study, and the amount they collected averaged 53 g of produce per household member per day. Whether they harvested or not, most gardeners gave preference to diversity, taste and healthiness of produce over quantity produced. Interviews revealed a value assigned to social, cultural and symbolic dimensions: pride in producing and cooking their own produce, related self-esteem, and sharing their produce at the meal table. The only significant difference between the food supplies of gardener and non-gardener households was seen for fruit and vegetables (369 vs. 211 g/d per person). This difference was due to larger purchases of fruit and vegetables, and not to higher quantities produced. In spite of the cross-sectional nature of our study and the small quantities harvested, our results suggest that having access to a community garden could encourage socio-economically disadvantaged women to adopt dietary practices that more closely meet dietary recommendations.

摘要

社会不平等的饮食归因于社会文化决定因素、经济限制以及获得健康食品的机会不平等。弱势群体的饮食中缺乏水果和蔬菜。本研究旨在检验以下假设:在贫困社区,社区园丁拥有的健康食品(尤其是水果和蔬菜)供应量将大于非园丁。我们从生产、经济和营养以及社会和象征意义等多个维度来研究社区花园,这些维度涉及到法国马赛贫困社区中获得社区花园用地的女性,采用了多学科的研究方法。我们分析并比较了园丁每月的家庭食品供应(购买和花园生产)与同社区、没有花园的具有相似社会经济状况的女性的供应情况。共有 21 名园丁参与了研究。只有 11 名园丁在研究期间有收获,平均每个家庭每天有 53 克的收获。无论是否有收获,大多数园丁都更喜欢多样性、口味和健康的产品,而不是产量。访谈揭示了对社会、文化和象征意义的重视:对生产和烹饪自己的产品感到自豪、与自尊相关的方面,以及在餐桌上分享自己的产品。园丁和非园丁家庭的食品供应之间唯一的显著差异体现在水果和蔬菜上(369 比 211 克/人/天)。这种差异是由于水果和蔬菜的购买量较大,而不是由于产量较高。尽管我们的研究是横断面的,而且收获量较小,但我们的结果表明,获得社区花园可以鼓励社会经济处于不利地位的女性采取更符合饮食建议的饮食习惯。

相似文献

1
Community gardening in poor neighborhoods in France: A way to re-think food practices?法国贫困社区的社区园艺:重新思考食物实践的一种方式?
Appetite. 2017 Sep 1;116:589-598. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.023. Epub 2017 May 17.
2
Availability of, access to and consumption of fruits and vegetables in a peri-urban area in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省一个城郊地区水果和蔬菜的供应、获取和消费情况。
Matern Child Nutr. 2013 Jul;9(3):409-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2011.00372.x. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
3
Improving lifestyles sustainability through community gardening: results and lessons learnt from the JArDinS quasi-experimental study.通过社区园艺提高生活方式的可持续性:来自JArDinS准实验研究的结果与经验教训。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 26;20(1):1798. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09836-6.
4
[Relationship between fruit and vegetable gardening and health-related factors: male community gardeners aged 50-74 years living in a suburban area of Japan].果蔬园艺与健康相关因素之间的关系:居住在日本郊区的50 - 74岁男性社区园艺者
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2017;64(11):684-694. doi: 10.11236/jph.64.11_684.
5
Perceived quality and availability of fruit and vegetables are associated with perceptions of fruit and vegetable affordability among socio-economically disadvantaged women.社会经济地位处于劣势的女性对水果和蔬菜的质量和可获得性的感知与她们对水果和蔬菜可负担性的感知有关。
Public Health Nutr. 2012 Jul;15(7):1262-7. doi: 10.1017/S1368980011003417. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
6
Estimated lead (Pb) exposures for a population of urban community gardeners.城市社区园丁群体的铅(Pb)暴露估计值。
Environ Geochem Health. 2016 Aug;38(4):955-71. doi: 10.1007/s10653-016-9790-8. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
7
Socio-demographic influences on food purchasing among Canadian households.社会人口统计学因素对加拿大家庭食品购买行为的影响。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006 Jun;60(6):778-90. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602382. Epub 2006 Jan 18.
8
A cross-sectional analysis of the cost and affordability of achieving recommended intakes of non-starchy fruits and vegetables in the capital of Vanuatu.瓦努阿图首都实现推荐非淀粉类蔬菜水果摄入量的成本和可负担性的横断面分析。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Mar 28;15:301. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1644-2.
9
Availability, affordability, and consumption of fruits and vegetables in 18 countries across income levels: findings from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study.18 个不同收入水平国家的水果和蔬菜可得性、可负担性和消费情况:前瞻性城乡流行病学(PURE)研究的结果。
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Oct;4(10):e695-703. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30186-3. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
10
Dietary Diversity and Vegetable and Fruit Consumption of Households in a Resource-Poor Peri-Urban South Africa Community Differ by Food Security Status.南非资源匮乏的城郊社区家庭的饮食多样性以及蔬菜和水果消费量因粮食安全状况而异。
Ecol Food Nutr. 2017 Jan-Feb;56(1):62-80. doi: 10.1080/03670244.2016.1261024. Epub 2016 Dec 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Does Home and Wild Food Procurement Enhance Food Security in High-Income Countries?在高收入国家,家庭和野生食物采购能增强粮食安全吗?
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2025 Aug 26;12(1):32. doi: 10.1007/s40572-025-00495-6.
2
Environmental Impact of Current Diets and Alternative Dietary Scenarios Worldwide: A Systematic Review.全球当前饮食及替代饮食方案的环境影响:一项系统综述
Nutr Rev. 2025 Sep 1;83(9):1678-1710. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuae215.
3
Each Indicator of Socioeconomic Status (Education, Occupation, Income, and Household Size) Is Differently Associated with Children's Diets: Results from a Cross-Sectional CroCOSI Study.
社会经济地位的每个指标(教育程度、职业、收入和家庭规模)与儿童饮食的关联各不相同:一项横断面CroCOSI研究的结果。
Nutrients. 2025 Feb 12;17(4):657. doi: 10.3390/nu17040657.
4
The impact of exposure to green or bluespace on dietary intake and food choices among adults-A systematic literature review.接触绿色或蓝色空间对成年人饮食摄入量和食物选择的影响——一项系统文献综述
Food Sci Nutr. 2024 Nov 4;12(12):9913-9927. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.4447. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Measuring characteristics of wild and cultivated food environments: a scoping review.测量野生和栽培食物环境的特征:范围综述。
BMC Med. 2024 Nov 7;22(1):519. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03678-4.
6
Community Gardening Increases Vegetable Intake and Seasonal Eating From Baseline to Harvest: Results from a Mixed Methods Randomized Controlled Trial.社区园艺增加蔬菜摄入量并促进从基线到收获期的季节性饮食:一项混合方法随机对照试验的结果
Curr Dev Nutr. 2023 Apr 15;7(5):100077. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2023.100077. eCollection 2023 May.
7
Exploring the benefits of nature-based interventions in socio-economically deprived communities: a narrative review of the evidence to date.探讨基于自然的干预措施在社会经济贫困社区中的益处:对现有证据的叙述性综述。
Perspect Public Health. 2023 May;143(3):156-172. doi: 10.1177/17579139231170768. Epub 2023 May 13.
8
Connecting to nature through community engaged scholarship: Community gardens as sites for collaborative relationships, psychological, and physiological wellbeing.通过社区参与式学术研究与自然建立联系:社区花园作为促进合作关系、心理和生理健康的场所。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 28;13:883817. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.883817. eCollection 2022.
9
Community gardens and their effects on diet, health, psychosocial and community outcomes: a systematic review.社区花园及其对饮食、健康、心理社会和社区结果的影响:系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 23;22(1):1247. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13591-1.
10
Improving lifestyles sustainability through community gardening: results and lessons learnt from the JArDinS quasi-experimental study.通过社区园艺提高生活方式的可持续性:来自JArDinS准实验研究的结果与经验教训。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 26;20(1):1798. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09836-6.