• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Connecting to nature through community engaged scholarship: Community gardens as sites for collaborative relationships, psychological, and physiological wellbeing.通过社区参与式学术研究与自然建立联系:社区花园作为促进合作关系、心理和生理健康的场所。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 28;13:883817. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.883817. eCollection 2022.
2
"You feel like you're part of something bigger": exploring motivations for community garden participation in Melbourne, Australia.“你会觉得自己是更宏大事物的一部分”:探究澳大利亚墨尔本社区花园参与动机。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 13;19(1):745. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7108-3.
3
Community-Engaged Research for the Promotion of Healthy Urban Environments: A Case Study of Community Garden Initiative in Shanghai, China.社区参与式研究促进健康城市环境:以上海社区花园倡议为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 28;16(21):4145. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214145.
4
Trust, Connection and Equity: Can Understanding Context Help to Establish Successful Campus Community Gardens?信任、联系和公平:理解背景能否帮助建立成功的校园社区花园?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 14;17(20):7476. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207476.
5
Community gardens and wellbeing amongst vulnerable populations: a thematic review.社区花园与弱势群体的幸福感:主题述评。
Health Promot Int. 2020 Aug 1;35(4):790-803. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daz067.
6
Enablers and Barriers of Community Garden Use in New Orleans, Louisiana: An Environmental Assessment and Qualitative Analysis.路易斯安那州新奥尔良市社区花园使用的促进因素和障碍:环境评估和定性分析。
Am J Health Promot. 2023 Mar;37(3):356-365. doi: 10.1177/08901171221131710. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
7
Environmental, health, wellbeing, social and equity effects of urban green space interventions: A meta-narrative evidence synthesis.城市绿地干预的环境、健康、福利、社会和公平影响:元叙述证据综合。
Environ Int. 2019 Sep;130:104923. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.104923. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
8
Exploring the effects of the Covid-19 pandemic on people's relationships with gardens.探索新冠疫情对人们与花园关系的影响。
Emot Space Soc. 2023 Feb;46:100936. doi: 10.1016/j.emospa.2022.100936. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
9
Sowing social inclusion for marginalised residents of a social housing development through a community garden.通过社区花园为社会住房发展中被边缘化的居民播种社会包容。
Health Promot J Austr. 2019 Sep;30(3):350-358. doi: 10.1002/hpja.225. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
10
Therapeutic Community Gardening as a Green Social Prescription for Mental Ill-Health: Impact, Barriers, and Facilitators from the Perspective of Multiple Stakeholders.治疗性社区园艺作为一种绿色社会处方,用于治疗精神健康问题:从多方利益相关者的角度看其影响、障碍和促进因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 20;19(20):13612. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013612.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationships between arts participation, social cohesion, and well-being: an integrative review of evidence.艺术参与、社会凝聚力与幸福感之间的关系:证据的综合综述
Front Public Health. 2025 May 9;13:1589693. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1589693. eCollection 2025.
2
Recovery Horizons: Nature-Based Activities as Adjunctive Treatments for Co-Occurring Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Substance Use Disorders.康复视野:基于自然的活动作为创伤后应激障碍和物质使用障碍并发的辅助治疗方法
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2024 Nov 15:15598276241300475. doi: 10.1177/15598276241300475.

本文引用的文献

1
Community-Engaged Research for the Promotion of Healthy Urban Environments: A Case Study of Community Garden Initiative in Shanghai, China.社区参与式研究促进健康城市环境:以上海社区花园倡议为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 28;16(21):4145. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214145.
2
Immersive Nature-Experiences as Health Promotion Interventions for Healthy, Vulnerable, and Sick Populations? A Systematic Review and Appraisal of Controlled Studies.沉浸式自然体验作为针对健康、易患病和患病群体的健康促进干预措施?对照研究的系统评价与评估
Front Psychol. 2019 May 3;10:943. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00943. eCollection 2019.
3
What gardens grow: Outcomes from home and community gardens supported by community-based food justice organizations.花园里生长着什么:由社区粮食正义组织支持的家庭和社区花园的成果。
J Agric Food Syst Community Dev. 2018 Jul 19;8(Suppl 1):187-205. doi: 10.5304/jafscd.2018.08A.002. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
4
Modern Compact Cities: How Much Greenery Do We Need?现代紧凑型城市:我们需要多少绿化?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 5;15(10):2180. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102180.
5
Nature Contact and Human Health: A Research Agenda.自然接触与人类健康:一项研究议程。
Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Jul 31;125(7):075001. doi: 10.1289/EHP1663.
6
The Relationship between the Physical Activity Environment, Nature Relatedness, Anxiety, and the Psychological Well-being Benefits of Regular Exercisers.体育活动环境、与自然的关联、焦虑以及规律锻炼者的心理健康益处之间的关系
Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 26;8:1058. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01058. eCollection 2017.
7
Community gardening in poor neighborhoods in France: A way to re-think food practices?法国贫困社区的社区园艺:重新思考食物实践的一种方式?
Appetite. 2017 Sep 1;116:589-598. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.023. Epub 2017 May 17.
8
Review of 99 self-report measures for assessing well-being in adults: exploring dimensions of well-being and developments over time.99项评估成年人幸福感的自我报告测量方法综述:探索幸福感维度及随时间的发展
BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 7;6(7):e010641. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010641.
9
Mitigating Stress and Supporting Health in Deprived Urban Communities: The Importance of Green Space and the Social Environment.缓解贫困城市社区的压力并促进健康:绿色空间和社会环境的重要性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Apr 22;13(4):440. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13040440.
10
Are biophilic-designed site office buildings linked to health benefits and high performing occupants?亲生物设计的工地办公楼是否与健康益处和高效能的居住者有关?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Nov 26;11(12):12204-22. doi: 10.3390/ijerph111212204.

通过社区参与式学术研究与自然建立联系:社区花园作为促进合作关系、心理和生理健康的场所。

Connecting to nature through community engaged scholarship: Community gardens as sites for collaborative relationships, psychological, and physiological wellbeing.

作者信息

Ward Kumara San, Truong Son, Gray Tonia

机构信息

Education and Society, School of Humanities, Social Sciences and Law, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.

School of Education, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 28;13:883817. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.883817. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.883817
PMID:35966485
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9366467/
Abstract

Community gardens are recognized as being associated with a range of benefits for participants that include enhanced outcomes in physical and affective domains and community building. The purpose of this study was to research the impact of the New South Wales Royal Botanic Gardens (RBG) Community Greening (CG) program and to inform the ongoing development of this community outreach program. The organic community partnerships inherent in the design and the relationships between the Community Greening program participants and researchers is examined through the lens of Community Engaged Scholarship (CES). Over a seven-month period, the CG team implemented a community garden development program in six sites. Mixed-method research on the impact of the program found that the community gardening participants experienced positive changes in physical activity, psychological wellbeing and motivation for social engagement, and these outcomes were facilitated as a result of their relationships with members of the CG team. This paper examines how such programs, when explicitly framed as CES, could assist in consolidating nature-based community health and wellbeing programs and further legitimize community partnerships in development of community garden and green spaces as academically sound investigation and socio-economically justified activity. Expansion of this nature-based collaboration model may also enhance community engagement in green exercise, psychological wellbeing and community cohesion, and in turn support advocacy for greener environments locally, regionally and nationally.

摘要

社区花园被认为能为参与者带来一系列益处,包括在身体和情感领域取得更好的成果以及促进社区建设。本研究的目的是调查新南威尔士皇家植物园(RBG)社区绿化(CG)项目的影响,并为该社区外展项目的持续发展提供信息。通过社区参与式学术研究(CES)的视角,审视了该项目设计中固有的有机社区伙伴关系以及社区绿化项目参与者与研究人员之间的关系。在七个月的时间里,CG团队在六个地点实施了一个社区花园发展项目。对该项目影响的混合方法研究发现,参与社区园艺的人员在身体活动、心理健康和社会参与动机方面都有积极变化,而这些成果得益于他们与CG团队成员的关系。本文探讨了此类项目在明确以CES为框架时,如何有助于巩固基于自然的社区健康与福祉项目,并进一步使社区花园和绿地开发中的社区伙伴关系合法化,成为学术上合理且社会经济上可行的活动。这种基于自然的合作模式的扩展还可能增强社区对绿色运动、心理健康和社区凝聚力的参与,进而支持在地方、区域和国家层面倡导更绿色的环境。