Ward Kumara San, Truong Son, Gray Tonia
Education and Society, School of Humanities, Social Sciences and Law, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.
School of Education, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 28;13:883817. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.883817. eCollection 2022.
Community gardens are recognized as being associated with a range of benefits for participants that include enhanced outcomes in physical and affective domains and community building. The purpose of this study was to research the impact of the New South Wales Royal Botanic Gardens (RBG) Community Greening (CG) program and to inform the ongoing development of this community outreach program. The organic community partnerships inherent in the design and the relationships between the Community Greening program participants and researchers is examined through the lens of Community Engaged Scholarship (CES). Over a seven-month period, the CG team implemented a community garden development program in six sites. Mixed-method research on the impact of the program found that the community gardening participants experienced positive changes in physical activity, psychological wellbeing and motivation for social engagement, and these outcomes were facilitated as a result of their relationships with members of the CG team. This paper examines how such programs, when explicitly framed as CES, could assist in consolidating nature-based community health and wellbeing programs and further legitimize community partnerships in development of community garden and green spaces as academically sound investigation and socio-economically justified activity. Expansion of this nature-based collaboration model may also enhance community engagement in green exercise, psychological wellbeing and community cohesion, and in turn support advocacy for greener environments locally, regionally and nationally.
社区花园被认为能为参与者带来一系列益处,包括在身体和情感领域取得更好的成果以及促进社区建设。本研究的目的是调查新南威尔士皇家植物园(RBG)社区绿化(CG)项目的影响,并为该社区外展项目的持续发展提供信息。通过社区参与式学术研究(CES)的视角,审视了该项目设计中固有的有机社区伙伴关系以及社区绿化项目参与者与研究人员之间的关系。在七个月的时间里,CG团队在六个地点实施了一个社区花园发展项目。对该项目影响的混合方法研究发现,参与社区园艺的人员在身体活动、心理健康和社会参与动机方面都有积极变化,而这些成果得益于他们与CG团队成员的关系。本文探讨了此类项目在明确以CES为框架时,如何有助于巩固基于自然的社区健康与福祉项目,并进一步使社区花园和绿地开发中的社区伙伴关系合法化,成为学术上合理且社会经济上可行的活动。这种基于自然的合作模式的扩展还可能增强社区对绿色运动、心理健康和社区凝聚力的参与,进而支持在地方、区域和国家层面倡导更绿色的环境。