Katayose Tetsurou, Saitoh Hidetoshi, Igari Mitsunobu, Chang Weishan, Hashimoto Shimpei, Morioka Mie
Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 7-2-10 Higashiogu, Arakawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Chiba Cancer Center, 666-2 Nitona-chou, Chuo-ku, Chiba, Japan.
Jpn J Radiol. 2017 Jul;35(7):389-397. doi: 10.1007/s11604-017-0644-9. Epub 2017 May 20.
The JSMP01 dosimetry protocol had adopted the provisional Co calibration coefficient [Formula: see text], namely, the product of exposure calibration coefficient N and conversion coefficient k . After that, the absorbed dose to water D standard was established, and the JSMP12 protocol adopted the [Formula: see text] calibration. In this study, the influence of the calibration shift on the measurement of D among users was analyzed.
The intercomparison of the D using an ionization chamber was annually performed by visiting related hospitals. Intercomparison results before and after the calibration shift were analyzed, the deviation of D among users was re-evaluated, and the cause of deviation was estimated.
As a result, the stability of LINAC, calibration of the thermometer and barometer, and collection method of ion recombination were confirmed. The statistical significance of standard deviation of D was not observed, but that of difference of D among users was observed between N and [Formula: see text] calibration.
Uncertainty due to chamber-to-chamber variation was reduced by the calibration shift, consequently reducing the uncertainty among users regarding D . The result also pointed out uncertainty might be reduced by accurate and detailed instructions on the setup of an ionization chamber.